Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile.

A. Vincent, Scott E. Bevans, J. Robitschek, G. Wind, M. Hohman
{"title":"Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile.","authors":"A. Vincent, Scott E. Bevans, J. Robitschek, G. Wind, M. Hohman","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nSynkinesis is the involuntary movement of 1 area of the face accompanying volitional movement of another; it is commonly encountered in patients affected by facial palsy. Current treatments for synkinesis include biofeedback for muscular retraining and chemodenervation via the injection of botulinum toxin. Chemodenervation is effective in reducing unwanted muscle movement, but it requires a commitment to long-term maintenance injections and may lose effectiveness over time. A permanent solution for synkinesis remains elusive.\n\n\nObjective\nTo evaluate masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with selective neurectomy in rehabilitation of the synkinetic smile.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nIn this case series, 7 patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital underwent masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with selective neurectomy for synkinesis between September 14, 2015, and April 19, 2018. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed and demographic characteristics, facial palsy causes, other interventions used, and changes in eFACE scores were identified.\n\n\nIntervention\nMasseteric-to-facial nerve transfer.\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nChanges in eFACE scores (calculated via numeric scoring of many sections of the face, including flaccidity, normal tone, and hypertonicity; higher scores indicate better function and lower scores indicate poorer function) and House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System scores (range, 1-6; a score of 1 indicates normal facial function on the affected side, and a score of 6 indicates absence of any facial function [complete flaccid palsy] on the affected side).\n\n\nResults\nAmong the 7 patients in the study (6 women and 1 man; median age, 49 years [range, 41-63 years]), there were no postoperative complications; patients were followed up for a mean of 12.8 months after surgery (range, 11.0-24.5 months). Patients experienced a significant improvement in mean (SD) eFACE scores in multiple domains, including smile (preoperative, 65.00 [8.64]; postoperative, 76.43 [7.79]; P = .01), dynamic function (preoperative, 62.57 [15.37]; and postoperative, 75.71 [8.48]; P = .03), synkinesis (preoperative, 52.70 [4.96]; and postoperative, 82.00 [6.93]; P < .001), midface and smile function (preoperative, 60.71 [13.52]; and postoperative, 78.86 [14.70]; P = .02), and lower face and neck function (preoperative, 51.14 [16.39]; and postoperative, 66.43 [20.82]; P = .046). Preoperative House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System scores ranged from 3 to 4, and postoperative scores ranged from 2 to 3; this change was not significant.\n\n\nConclusion and Relevance\nThis study describes the application of masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with selective neurectomy for smile rehabilitation in patients with synkinesis, with statistically significant improvement in smile symmetry and lower facial synkinesis as measured with the eFACE tool. This technique may allow for long-term improvement of synkinesis and smile. This study is only preliminary, and a larger cohort will permit more accurate assessment of this therapeutic modality.\n\n\nLevel of Evidence\n4.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0689","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Importance Synkinesis is the involuntary movement of 1 area of the face accompanying volitional movement of another; it is commonly encountered in patients affected by facial palsy. Current treatments for synkinesis include biofeedback for muscular retraining and chemodenervation via the injection of botulinum toxin. Chemodenervation is effective in reducing unwanted muscle movement, but it requires a commitment to long-term maintenance injections and may lose effectiveness over time. A permanent solution for synkinesis remains elusive. Objective To evaluate masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with selective neurectomy in rehabilitation of the synkinetic smile. Design, Setting, and Participants In this case series, 7 patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital underwent masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with selective neurectomy for synkinesis between September 14, 2015, and April 19, 2018. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed and demographic characteristics, facial palsy causes, other interventions used, and changes in eFACE scores were identified. Intervention Masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in eFACE scores (calculated via numeric scoring of many sections of the face, including flaccidity, normal tone, and hypertonicity; higher scores indicate better function and lower scores indicate poorer function) and House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System scores (range, 1-6; a score of 1 indicates normal facial function on the affected side, and a score of 6 indicates absence of any facial function [complete flaccid palsy] on the affected side). Results Among the 7 patients in the study (6 women and 1 man; median age, 49 years [range, 41-63 years]), there were no postoperative complications; patients were followed up for a mean of 12.8 months after surgery (range, 11.0-24.5 months). Patients experienced a significant improvement in mean (SD) eFACE scores in multiple domains, including smile (preoperative, 65.00 [8.64]; postoperative, 76.43 [7.79]; P = .01), dynamic function (preoperative, 62.57 [15.37]; and postoperative, 75.71 [8.48]; P = .03), synkinesis (preoperative, 52.70 [4.96]; and postoperative, 82.00 [6.93]; P < .001), midface and smile function (preoperative, 60.71 [13.52]; and postoperative, 78.86 [14.70]; P = .02), and lower face and neck function (preoperative, 51.14 [16.39]; and postoperative, 66.43 [20.82]; P = .046). Preoperative House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System scores ranged from 3 to 4, and postoperative scores ranged from 2 to 3; this change was not significant. Conclusion and Relevance This study describes the application of masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer with selective neurectomy for smile rehabilitation in patients with synkinesis, with statistically significant improvement in smile symmetry and lower facial synkinesis as measured with the eFACE tool. This technique may allow for long-term improvement of synkinesis and smile. This study is only preliminary, and a larger cohort will permit more accurate assessment of this therapeutic modality. Level of Evidence 4.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面神经块转移和选择性神经切除治疗合动力微笑的康复。
同步运动是面部一个区域的不自主运动伴随另一个区域的意志运动;常见于面瘫患者。目前的治疗方法包括肌肉再训练的生物反馈和通过注射肉毒杆菌毒素的化学神经支配。化学神经支配在减少不必要的肌肉运动方面是有效的,但它需要长期维持注射,并且可能随着时间的推移而失去效果。永久解决联胞作用的方法仍然难以捉摸。目的探讨选择性按摩面神经移植联合神经切除术对联合运动微笑的康复作用。设计、环境和参与者:在该病例系列中,2015年9月14日至2018年4月19日期间,一家三级护理教学医院的7名患者接受了按摩至面神经移植和选择性神经切除术以治疗联动性。对这些患者的医疗记录进行回顾性分析,确定了人口统计学特征、面瘫原因、使用的其他干预措施以及eFACE评分的变化。介入:按摩-面神经转移。eFACE评分的变化(通过面部许多部分的数字评分计算,包括松弛、正常音调和高张力;分数越高,功能越好,分数越低,功能越差)和House-Brackmann面神经评分系统评分(范围:1-6;1分表示患侧面部功能正常,6分表示患侧没有任何面部功能(完全弛缓性麻痹)。结果本组7例患者(女6例,男1例;中位年龄49岁[范围41 ~ 63岁]),无术后并发症;术后平均随访12.8个月(11.0 ~ 24.5个月)。患者在多个领域的平均(SD) eFACE评分显著改善,包括微笑(术前,65.00 [8.64];术后76.43 [7.79];P = 0.01),动态函数(术前,62.57 [15.37];术后,75.71 [8.48];P = 0.03),综合运动(术前,52.70 [4.96];术后82.00 [6.93];P < 0.001),中脸和微笑功能(术前,60.71 [13.52];术后78.86 [14.70];P = .02),下面部和颈部功能(术前,51.14 [16.39];术后66.43 [20.82];p = .046)。术前House-Brackmann面神经评分系统评分为3 ~ 4分,术后评分为2 ~ 3分;这种变化并不显著。结论与相关性本研究描述了选择性神经切除术中咬面神经移植对伴联动患者微笑康复的应用,用eFACE工具测量的微笑对称性和下面部联动的改善具有统计学意义。这项技术可以长期改善肢体协调和微笑。这项研究只是初步的,更大的队列将允许对这种治疗方式进行更准确的评估。证据水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1