Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility.

Journal of therapeutic ultrasound Pub Date : 2018-11-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3
Anne-Sophie Bertrand, Antoine Iannessi, Romain Natale, Hubert Beaumont, Sebastien Patriti, Jiang Xiong-Ying, Guillaume Baudin, Antoine Thyss
{"title":"Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility.","authors":"Anne-Sophie Bertrand,&nbsp;Antoine Iannessi,&nbsp;Romain Natale,&nbsp;Hubert Beaumont,&nbsp;Sebastien Patriti,&nbsp;Jiang Xiong-Ying,&nbsp;Guillaume Baudin,&nbsp;Antoine Thyss","doi":"10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of bone metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center prospective study was made involving 17 consecutive patients with symptomatic bone metastases. Patients were treated by Focused Ultrasound (FUs) performed with magnetic resonance (MR) guidance. Surgical treatment or radiotherapy treatment was not indicated for patients who underwent FUs. Lesions were located in the appendicular and axial skeleton and consisted of secondary symptomatic lesions. The clinical course of pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment, at 1 week, and at 1 month after treatment and the Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD) was also recorded. We used Wilcoxon signed rank test to assess change in patient pain (R CRAN software V 3.1.1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a significant decrease in the pain felt by patients between pre- procedure and 1 week post-procedure (<i>p</i> = 2.9.10-4), and pre-procedure and 1 month post-procedure (<i>p</i> = 3.10-4). The proportion of responders according to the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party was: Partial Response 50% (8/16) and Complete Response 37.5% (6/16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIFU under MR-guidance seems to be an effective and safe procedure in the treatment of symptomatic bone lesions for patients suffering from metastatic disease. A significant decrease of patient pain was observed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT01091883. Registered 24 March 2010. Level of evidence: Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":90245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of therapeutic ultrasound","volume":"6 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of therapeutic ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40349-018-0117-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of bone metastases.

Methods: A single-center prospective study was made involving 17 consecutive patients with symptomatic bone metastases. Patients were treated by Focused Ultrasound (FUs) performed with magnetic resonance (MR) guidance. Surgical treatment or radiotherapy treatment was not indicated for patients who underwent FUs. Lesions were located in the appendicular and axial skeleton and consisted of secondary symptomatic lesions. The clinical course of pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment, at 1 week, and at 1 month after treatment and the Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD) was also recorded. We used Wilcoxon signed rank test to assess change in patient pain (R CRAN software V 3.1.1).

Results: We observed a significant decrease in the pain felt by patients between pre- procedure and 1 week post-procedure (p = 2.9.10-4), and pre-procedure and 1 month post-procedure (p = 3.10-4). The proportion of responders according to the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party was: Partial Response 50% (8/16) and Complete Response 37.5% (6/16).

Conclusions: HIFU under MR-guidance seems to be an effective and safe procedure in the treatment of symptomatic bone lesions for patients suffering from metastatic disease. A significant decrease of patient pain was observed.

Trial registration: NCT01091883. Registered 24 March 2010. Level of evidence: Level 3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚焦超声治疗骨转移瘤的有效性和可行性。
背景:评价高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗骨转移瘤的有效性和可行性。方法:对17例有症状的骨转移患者进行单中心前瞻性研究。患者在磁共振(MR)引导下接受聚焦超声(FUs)治疗。接受FUs的患者不需要手术治疗或放疗。病变位于阑尾和中轴骨骼,由继发性症状病变组成。治疗前、治疗后1周、治疗后1个月采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛的临床病程,并记录口服吗啡当量日剂量(OMEDD)。我们使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来评估患者疼痛的变化(R CRAN软件V 3.1.1)。结果:术前与术后1周(p = 2.9.10-4)、术前与术后1个月(p = 3.10-4)疼痛明显减轻。根据国际骨转移共识工作组的数据,缓解者的比例为:部分缓解50%(8/16),完全缓解37.5%(6/16)。结论:mri引导下的HIFU似乎是治疗转移性疾病患者症状性骨病变的一种有效且安全的方法。观察到患者疼痛明显减轻。试验注册:NCT01091883。2010年3月24日注册。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcranial and pulsed focused ultrasound that activates brain can accelerate remyelination in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Focused ultrasound for the treatment of bone metastases: effectiveness and feasibility. Wedged gel pad for bowel manipulation during MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy to treat uterine fibroids: a case report. The fine spatial and temporal control of ultrasonic neuromodulation is a necessary condition for discerning the accompanying subjective feelings, but is it sufficient? MR thermometry-guided ultrasound hyperthermia of user-defined regions using the ExAblate prostate ablation array.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1