Postoperative Ecchymosis and Edema After Creation of Subperiosteal Tunnels in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

David S Chan, Michael Roskies, Alex Alborz Jooya, Mark Samaha
{"title":"Postoperative Ecchymosis and Edema After Creation of Subperiosteal Tunnels in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"David S Chan,&nbsp;Michael Roskies,&nbsp;Alex Alborz Jooya,&nbsp;Mark Samaha","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Periorbital ecchymosis and edema are commonly associated with rhinoplasty and are the principal limiting factors for return to daily activities after rhinoplasty. Several methods have been evaluated to minimize these sequelae including creation of subperiosteal tunnels, which involves elevating the vascular periosteal layer, preserving it from trauma when creating osteotomies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of the creation of subperiosteal tunnels prior to lateral osteotomies during rhinoplasty for reducing postoperative ecchymosis and edema.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A randomized, blinded, matched-paired, prospective, clinical trial took place between April 1 and August 30, 2015, in a private practice in a stand-alone clinic and surgical center. All patients who were undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty requiring bilateral lateral osteotomies were offered inclusion in the trial. All 34 enrolled patients completed the follow-up requirements.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Creation of subperiosteal tunnels prior to lateral osteotomies on 1 randomly selected side.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Three blinded evaluators independently graded the degree of ecchymosis and edema on a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 on each side of the nose on postoperative days 2 and 7. Each patient had 1 side that was randomly selected to undergo creation of subperiosteal tunnels. A difference in mean score between sides of the nose was calculated for each patient using a paired t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 34 patients (28 females and 6 males; mean [SD] age, 27.3 [9.2]), the mean (SD) difference in ecchymosis scores between sides on day 2 was -0.05 (1.94) (95% CI, -0.43 to 0.33) and on day 7 was -0.22 (1.23) (95% CI, -0.47 to 0.02), favoring the side without tunnels. The mean (SD) difference in edema scores on day 2 was -0.21 (1.66) (95% CI, 0.53-0.12) and on day 7 was -0.29 (1.11) (95% CI, -0.51 to -0.07). There were no clinically significant differences between sides in terms of postoperative ecchymosis and edema.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Ecchymosis and edema can have significant postoperative practical, emotional, and financial effects on patients. Creation of subperiosteal tunnels prior to lateral osteotomies showed no clinically significant differences in edema and ecchymosis after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>1.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN42741475.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"133-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1716","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Importance: Periorbital ecchymosis and edema are commonly associated with rhinoplasty and are the principal limiting factors for return to daily activities after rhinoplasty. Several methods have been evaluated to minimize these sequelae including creation of subperiosteal tunnels, which involves elevating the vascular periosteal layer, preserving it from trauma when creating osteotomies.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of the creation of subperiosteal tunnels prior to lateral osteotomies during rhinoplasty for reducing postoperative ecchymosis and edema.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized, blinded, matched-paired, prospective, clinical trial took place between April 1 and August 30, 2015, in a private practice in a stand-alone clinic and surgical center. All patients who were undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty requiring bilateral lateral osteotomies were offered inclusion in the trial. All 34 enrolled patients completed the follow-up requirements.

Intervention: Creation of subperiosteal tunnels prior to lateral osteotomies on 1 randomly selected side.

Main outcomes and measures: Three blinded evaluators independently graded the degree of ecchymosis and edema on a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 on each side of the nose on postoperative days 2 and 7. Each patient had 1 side that was randomly selected to undergo creation of subperiosteal tunnels. A difference in mean score between sides of the nose was calculated for each patient using a paired t test.

Results: Of the 34 patients (28 females and 6 males; mean [SD] age, 27.3 [9.2]), the mean (SD) difference in ecchymosis scores between sides on day 2 was -0.05 (1.94) (95% CI, -0.43 to 0.33) and on day 7 was -0.22 (1.23) (95% CI, -0.47 to 0.02), favoring the side without tunnels. The mean (SD) difference in edema scores on day 2 was -0.21 (1.66) (95% CI, 0.53-0.12) and on day 7 was -0.29 (1.11) (95% CI, -0.51 to -0.07). There were no clinically significant differences between sides in terms of postoperative ecchymosis and edema.

Conclusions and relevance: Ecchymosis and edema can have significant postoperative practical, emotional, and financial effects on patients. Creation of subperiosteal tunnels prior to lateral osteotomies showed no clinically significant differences in edema and ecchymosis after the procedure.

Level of evidence: 1.

Trial registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN42741475.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻整形术后骨膜下隧道形成后的瘀斑和水肿:一项随机临床试验。
重要性:眼眶周围瘀斑和水肿通常与鼻成形术相关,是鼻成形术后恢复日常活动的主要限制因素。已经评估了几种方法来减少这些后遗症,包括建立骨膜下隧道,这涉及到提升血管骨膜层,在进行截骨术时保护其免受创伤。目的:评价鼻成形术中外侧截骨前建立骨膜下隧道对减少术后瘀斑和水肿的疗效。设计、环境和参与者:一项随机、盲法、配对、前瞻性临床试验于2015年4月1日至8月30日在一家独立诊所和外科中心的私人诊所进行。所有需要双侧截骨术的鼻整形患者均被纳入试验。所有34例入组患者均完成了随访要求。干预措施:在随机选择一侧侧骨截骨术前建立骨膜下隧道。主要结果和测量:术后第2天和第7天,三名盲法评估者分别以0 - 10的视觉模拟评分对鼻部两侧瘀斑和水肿程度进行评分。每位患者随机选择一侧进行骨膜下隧道的建立。使用配对t检验计算每位患者鼻两侧平均评分的差异。结果:34例患者中,女性28例,男性6例;平均[SD]年龄,27.3[9.2]),第2天两侧瘀斑评分的平均(SD)差异为-0.05 (1.94)(95% CI, -0.43 ~ 0.33),第7天的平均(SD)差异为-0.22 (1.23)(95% CI, -0.47 ~ 0.02),偏向无隧道一侧。第2天水肿评分的平均(SD)差为-0.21 (1.66)(95% CI, 0.53-0.12),第7天的平均(SD)差为-0.29 (1.11)(95% CI, -0.51至-0.07)。两组在术后瘀斑和水肿方面无临床显著差异。结论和意义:瘀斑和水肿对患者术后实际、情感和经济都有显著影响。在侧骨截骨术之前建立骨膜下隧道,在手术后的水肿和瘀斑方面没有显著的临床差异。证据等级:1;试验注册:isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN42741475。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1