PET/CT and brain MRI role in staging NSCLC: prospective assessment of the accuracy, reliability and cost-effectiveness.

Pub Date : 2018-05-31 eCollection Date: 2018-06-01 DOI:10.2217/lmt-2018-0008
Vasiliki-Konstantina I Gkogkozotou, Ioannis C Gkiozos, Andriani G Charpidou, Elias A Kotteas, Paraskevi G Boura, Sophia N Tsagouli, Konstantinos N Syrigos
{"title":"PET/CT and brain MRI role in staging NSCLC: prospective assessment of the accuracy, reliability and cost-effectiveness.","authors":"Vasiliki-Konstantina I Gkogkozotou,&nbsp;Ioannis C Gkiozos,&nbsp;Andriani G Charpidou,&nbsp;Elias A Kotteas,&nbsp;Paraskevi G Boura,&nbsp;Sophia N Tsagouli,&nbsp;Konstantinos N Syrigos","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether PET/CT and brain MRI used in staging NSCLC can be accurate, reliable and cost-effective tools. NSCLC represents 80-85% of lung cancer and adequate information on the initial tumor staging is critical for planning an optimal therapeutic strategy.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>Data from 30 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients in Greece were collected and prospectively recorded. Patients with potential resectable disease were evaluated to ensure that there are no detectable metastases that would rule out the possibility of a curative surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Divergence occurred in 50% of cases of staging with CT or PET/CT alone, while metastases undetectable by the CT were revealed using PET/CT. Unnecessary thoracotomies were avoided by 10% of patients and another 10% was operated on after chemotherapy with a better prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET/CT and brain MRI combined are reliable for correct staging, reducing avoidable thoracotomies, morbidity rates and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2018-0008","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether PET/CT and brain MRI used in staging NSCLC can be accurate, reliable and cost-effective tools. NSCLC represents 80-85% of lung cancer and adequate information on the initial tumor staging is critical for planning an optimal therapeutic strategy.

Patients & methods: Data from 30 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients in Greece were collected and prospectively recorded. Patients with potential resectable disease were evaluated to ensure that there are no detectable metastases that would rule out the possibility of a curative surgery.

Results: Divergence occurred in 50% of cases of staging with CT or PET/CT alone, while metastases undetectable by the CT were revealed using PET/CT. Unnecessary thoracotomies were avoided by 10% of patients and another 10% was operated on after chemotherapy with a better prognosis.

Conclusion: PET/CT and brain MRI combined are reliable for correct staging, reducing avoidable thoracotomies, morbidity rates and costs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
PET/CT和脑MRI在NSCLC分期中的作用:准确性、可靠性和成本效益的前瞻性评估
目的:确定PET/CT和脑MRI用于NSCLC分期是否准确、可靠和经济。NSCLC占肺癌的80-85%,足够的初始肿瘤分期信息对于制定最佳治疗策略至关重要。患者和方法:收集希腊30例新诊断的非小细胞肺癌患者的数据并进行前瞻性记录。对潜在可切除疾病的患者进行评估,以确保没有可检测到的转移,从而排除治疗性手术的可能性。结果:单独使用CT或PET/CT时,50%的病例出现分期分化,而使用PET/CT时发现了CT未检测到的转移灶。10%的患者避免了不必要的开胸手术,另有10%的患者在化疗后进行了手术,预后较好。结论:PET/CT联合脑MRI可准确分期,减少可避免的开胸手术,降低发病率和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1