Assessment of a Novel Standardized Training System for Mandibular Contour Surgeries.

Jia Qiao, Jia Xu, Xi Fu, Feng Niu, Lai Gui, Sabine Girod, Chung-Kwan Yen, Jianfeng Liu, Ying Chen, Jeffrey W Kwong, Cai Wang, Huijun Zhang, Shixing Xu, Hamzah Alkofahi, Xiaoyan Mao
{"title":"Assessment of a Novel Standardized Training System for Mandibular Contour Surgeries.","authors":"Jia Qiao,&nbsp;Jia Xu,&nbsp;Xi Fu,&nbsp;Feng Niu,&nbsp;Lai Gui,&nbsp;Sabine Girod,&nbsp;Chung-Kwan Yen,&nbsp;Jianfeng Liu,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;Jeffrey W Kwong,&nbsp;Cai Wang,&nbsp;Huijun Zhang,&nbsp;Shixing Xu,&nbsp;Hamzah Alkofahi,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Mao","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mandibular contour surgeries (MCS) involving reduction gonioplasty and genioplasty are rewarding for patients with square faces; however, the procedure has inherently difficult clinician learning curves and unpredictable skill acquisitions. To our knowledge, there has been no effective, validated training model that might improve training and surgical outcomes for MCS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish and evaluate a standardized intraoral MCS training system.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Intraoral MCS training models were constructed by 3-dimensional (3D) skull models covered with elastic head cloths. From April 2016 to April 2018, 90 consecutive MCS patients (30 per group) and 15 craniofacial surgery fellow physicians (5 per group) were enrolled in the prospective observational study. They were randomly divided into intervention groups (A and B) and a control group (C). Intervention groups A and B completed 5 training sessions on the intraoral MCS training models before each clinical case. Group A performed both the model training sessions and clinical surgeries with surgical templates. Control group C had no extra training before clinical surgeries. All groups completed clinical surgery under supervision on 6 patients. The duration of follow-up was at least 3 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Intraoral MCS training models were provided to intervention groups (A and B) before clinical surgeries. Surgical templates were provided to intervention group A both in training sessions and clinical surgeries.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The completion time, surgical accuracy, learning curves, operating confidence, surgical skill, and outcome satisfaction of each procedure were recorded and analyzed with paired t test and 1-way analysis of variance test by blinded observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 90 patients (14 men, 76 women; mean [SD] age, 26 [5] years) were satisfied with their postoperative mandible contours. The intervention groups (A and B), especially the group with surgical templates (A) showed improvements in clinical surgery time (mean [SD], group A 147.2 [24.71] min; group B, 184.47 [16.28] min; group C, 219.3 [35.3] min; P = .001), surgical accuracy (mean [SD], group A, 0.68 [0.22] mm; group B, 1.22 [0.38] mm; group C, 1.88 [0.54] mm; P < .001), learning curves, and operators' confidence and surgical skill.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The intraoral MCS training model was effective and practical. The optimal intraoral MCS training system included intraoral MCS training models and surgical templates. The system significantly decreased clinical surgery time, improved surgical accuracy, shortened the learning curve, boosted operators' confidence, and was associated with better acquisition of surgical skills.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 3","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1863","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Importance: Mandibular contour surgeries (MCS) involving reduction gonioplasty and genioplasty are rewarding for patients with square faces; however, the procedure has inherently difficult clinician learning curves and unpredictable skill acquisitions. To our knowledge, there has been no effective, validated training model that might improve training and surgical outcomes for MCS.

Objective: To establish and evaluate a standardized intraoral MCS training system.

Design, setting, and participants: Intraoral MCS training models were constructed by 3-dimensional (3D) skull models covered with elastic head cloths. From April 2016 to April 2018, 90 consecutive MCS patients (30 per group) and 15 craniofacial surgery fellow physicians (5 per group) were enrolled in the prospective observational study. They were randomly divided into intervention groups (A and B) and a control group (C). Intervention groups A and B completed 5 training sessions on the intraoral MCS training models before each clinical case. Group A performed both the model training sessions and clinical surgeries with surgical templates. Control group C had no extra training before clinical surgeries. All groups completed clinical surgery under supervision on 6 patients. The duration of follow-up was at least 3 months postoperatively.

Interventions: Intraoral MCS training models were provided to intervention groups (A and B) before clinical surgeries. Surgical templates were provided to intervention group A both in training sessions and clinical surgeries.

Main outcomes and measures: The completion time, surgical accuracy, learning curves, operating confidence, surgical skill, and outcome satisfaction of each procedure were recorded and analyzed with paired t test and 1-way analysis of variance test by blinded observers.

Results: All 90 patients (14 men, 76 women; mean [SD] age, 26 [5] years) were satisfied with their postoperative mandible contours. The intervention groups (A and B), especially the group with surgical templates (A) showed improvements in clinical surgery time (mean [SD], group A 147.2 [24.71] min; group B, 184.47 [16.28] min; group C, 219.3 [35.3] min; P = .001), surgical accuracy (mean [SD], group A, 0.68 [0.22] mm; group B, 1.22 [0.38] mm; group C, 1.88 [0.54] mm; P < .001), learning curves, and operators' confidence and surgical skill.

Conclusions and relevance: The intraoral MCS training model was effective and practical. The optimal intraoral MCS training system included intraoral MCS training models and surgical templates. The system significantly decreased clinical surgery time, improved surgical accuracy, shortened the learning curve, boosted operators' confidence, and was associated with better acquisition of surgical skills.

Level of evidence: NA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的下颌轮廓手术标准化训练系统的评估。
重要性:下颌轮廓手术(MCS)包括颏部复位成形术和颏部成形术对方形脸患者是有益的;然而,该手术本身就有临床医生难以学习的曲线和不可预测的技能获取。据我们所知,目前还没有有效的、经过验证的培训模式可以改善MCS的培训和手术结果。目的:建立并评价规范化的口腔内MCS培训体系。设计、设置和参与者:口腔内MCS训练模型由覆盖弹性头布的三维颅骨模型构建。从2016年4月至2018年4月,90名连续的MCS患者(每组30名)和15名颅面外科医师(每组5名)被纳入前瞻性观察研究。随机分为干预组(A组、B组)和对照组(C组)。干预组(A组)和干预组(B组)在每个临床病例出现前完成5次口腔内MCS训练模型的训练。A组既进行模型训练,又使用手术模板进行临床手术。对照组C在临床手术前不进行额外的培训。所有组6例患者在监护下完成临床手术。术后随访至少3个月。干预措施:临床手术前给予干预组(A组和B组)口腔内MCS训练模型。干预组在培训和临床手术中均提供手术模板。主要观察指标:记录各手术的完成时间、手术准确度、学习曲线、手术信心、手术技巧、结局满意度,采用双盲观察配对t检验和单因素方差分析。结果:90例患者(男14例,女76例;平均[SD]年龄,26[5]岁)对术后下颌骨轮廓满意。干预组(A组和B组),特别是手术模板组(A组)临床手术时间均有改善(mean [SD], A组147.2 [24.71]min;B组,184.47 [16.28]min;C组219.3 [35.3]min;P = .001),手术准确度(mean [SD], A组,0.68 [0.22]mm;B组,1.22 [0.38]mm;C组,1.88 [0.54]mm;结论及意义:口腔内MCS训练模式有效、实用。优化的口腔内MCS训练系统包括口腔内MCS训练模型和手术模板。该系统显著缩短了临床手术时间,提高了手术准确性,缩短了学习曲线,增强了操作者的信心,并与更好地获得手术技能相关。证据等级:NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1