Characterization of Injury Induced by Routine Surgical Manipulations of Nasal Septal Cartilage.

William W Thomas, Robert M Brody, Abdullah D Alotaibi, Emilie C Rabut, Noam A Cohen, Robert Lyman, Milos Kovacevic, Oren Friedman, George R Dodge
{"title":"Characterization of Injury Induced by Routine Surgical Manipulations of Nasal Septal Cartilage.","authors":"William W Thomas,&nbsp;Robert M Brody,&nbsp;Abdullah D Alotaibi,&nbsp;Emilie C Rabut,&nbsp;Noam A Cohen,&nbsp;Robert Lyman,&nbsp;Milos Kovacevic,&nbsp;Oren Friedman,&nbsp;George R Dodge","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>This study characterizes and compares common surgical manipulations' effects on septal cartilage to understand their implications for rhinoplasty outcomes based on cell viability and cartilage health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To illustrate distinct differences in the impact of various surgical manipulations on septal cartilage in an in vitro septal cartilage model. A secondary objective is to better understand the chondrocyte's response to injury as well as how alterations in the extracellular matrix correspond to chondrocyte viability.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this bench-top in vitro porcine model using juvenile bovine septal cartilage from bovine snouts, easily obtainable septal cartilage was used to generate large numbers of homogenous cartilage specimens. Quantitative outcomes at early and late time points were cell viability, cell stress, matrix loss, and qualitative assessment through histologic examination. The study was performed at a single academic tertiary care research hospital.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Four common surgical manipulations were contrasted with a control group: crushed cartilage, scored cartilage, diced cartilage, and shaved cartilage.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Following the manipulation of the cartilage, the quantitative outcomes were glycosaminoglycan release to the media, lactate dehydrogenase release to the media, and cell death analysis through apoptosis staining. The qualitative outcomes were histologic staining of the manipulated cartilage with safranin-O/fast green stain to identify proteoglycan loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crushing followed by shaving manipulations were the most damaging as indicated by increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase release, glycosaminoglycans loss, and cell death. Matrix loss did not increase until after 48 hours postinjury. Furthermore, chondrocyte death was seen early after injury and accelerated to the late time point, day 9, in all manipulations. Conversely, cell stress was found to be greater at 48 hours postinjury, which then declined to the late time point, day 9.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The crushing manipulation followed by shaving and then dicing were the most destructive methods of cartilage manipulation relative to control specimens. Collectively, these outcomes demonstrate the range of injury which occurs with all septal cartilage manipulations and can inform rhinoplasty practice to use the least damaging effective surgical manipulation to obtain the desired outcome.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 5","pages":"393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0169","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Importance: This study characterizes and compares common surgical manipulations' effects on septal cartilage to understand their implications for rhinoplasty outcomes based on cell viability and cartilage health.

Objective: To illustrate distinct differences in the impact of various surgical manipulations on septal cartilage in an in vitro septal cartilage model. A secondary objective is to better understand the chondrocyte's response to injury as well as how alterations in the extracellular matrix correspond to chondrocyte viability.

Design, setting, and participants: In this bench-top in vitro porcine model using juvenile bovine septal cartilage from bovine snouts, easily obtainable septal cartilage was used to generate large numbers of homogenous cartilage specimens. Quantitative outcomes at early and late time points were cell viability, cell stress, matrix loss, and qualitative assessment through histologic examination. The study was performed at a single academic tertiary care research hospital.

Interventions: Four common surgical manipulations were contrasted with a control group: crushed cartilage, scored cartilage, diced cartilage, and shaved cartilage.

Main outcomes and measures: Following the manipulation of the cartilage, the quantitative outcomes were glycosaminoglycan release to the media, lactate dehydrogenase release to the media, and cell death analysis through apoptosis staining. The qualitative outcomes were histologic staining of the manipulated cartilage with safranin-O/fast green stain to identify proteoglycan loss.

Results: The crushing followed by shaving manipulations were the most damaging as indicated by increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase release, glycosaminoglycans loss, and cell death. Matrix loss did not increase until after 48 hours postinjury. Furthermore, chondrocyte death was seen early after injury and accelerated to the late time point, day 9, in all manipulations. Conversely, cell stress was found to be greater at 48 hours postinjury, which then declined to the late time point, day 9.

Conclusions and relevance: The crushing manipulation followed by shaving and then dicing were the most destructive methods of cartilage manipulation relative to control specimens. Collectively, these outcomes demonstrate the range of injury which occurs with all septal cartilage manipulations and can inform rhinoplasty practice to use the least damaging effective surgical manipulation to obtain the desired outcome.

Level of evidence: NA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规手术操作鼻中隔软骨损伤的特征分析。
重要性:本研究描述并比较了常见手术手法对鼻中隔软骨的影响,以了解它们对基于细胞活力和软骨健康的鼻成形术结果的影响。目的:在离体鼻中隔软骨模型中阐明不同手术手法对鼻中隔软骨影响的显著差异。第二个目的是更好地了解软骨细胞对损伤的反应,以及细胞外基质的改变如何对应软骨细胞的活力。设计、设置和参与者:在这个使用牛鼻部幼牛鼻中隔软骨的工作台离体猪模型中,容易获得的鼻中隔软骨被用来生成大量均匀的软骨标本。早期和晚期时间点的定量结果是细胞活力、细胞应激、基质损失和通过组织学检查的定性评估。该研究是在一个单一的学术三级保健研究型医院进行的。干预措施:四种常见的手术手法与对照组进行对比:软骨粉碎、软骨刻痕、软骨切块和软骨刨削。主要观察指标:软骨处理后,定量观察糖胺聚糖向培养基释放、乳酸脱氢酶向培养基释放、细胞凋亡染色分析细胞死亡情况。定性结果是用红花素- o /快速绿色染色法对软骨进行组织学染色,以确定蛋白聚糖的损失。结果:压碎后剃须操作是最具破坏性的,乳酸脱氢酶释放水平增加,糖胺聚糖损失和细胞死亡。损伤后48小时基质损失才增加。此外,在所有操作中,损伤后早期出现软骨细胞死亡,并加速到较晚的时间点(第9天)。相反,细胞应激在损伤后48小时更大,然后下降到较晚的时间点,第9天。结论及意义:与对照标本相比,粉碎手法、刮除手法、切丁手法对软骨的破坏最大。总的来说,这些结果显示了所有鼻中隔软骨操作发生的损伤范围,并可以为鼻整形实践提供信息,以使用损害最小的有效手术操作来获得预期的结果。证据等级:NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1