An International Collaborative Standardizing Patient-Centered Outcome Measures in Pediatric Facial Palsy.

Daniel P Butler, Alethse De la Torre, Gregory H Borschel, Tessa A Hadlock, Carien Beurskens, Kathleen Bogart, Alexander Cárdenas Mejía, Christopher Coombs, Jocelyne Copeland, Jacqueline Diels, Teresa González-Otero, Louise Graham, Lisa Ishii, Raman Malhotra, Adelaida Martinez, Lisa McKinley, Mara W Robinson, Sinikka Suominen, Akihiko Takushima, Evangelina Vazquez Curiel, Faye L Wachs, Adriaan O Grobbelaar
{"title":"An International Collaborative Standardizing Patient-Centered Outcome Measures in Pediatric Facial Palsy.","authors":"Daniel P Butler,&nbsp;Alethse De la Torre,&nbsp;Gregory H Borschel,&nbsp;Tessa A Hadlock,&nbsp;Carien Beurskens,&nbsp;Kathleen Bogart,&nbsp;Alexander Cárdenas Mejía,&nbsp;Christopher Coombs,&nbsp;Jocelyne Copeland,&nbsp;Jacqueline Diels,&nbsp;Teresa González-Otero,&nbsp;Louise Graham,&nbsp;Lisa Ishii,&nbsp;Raman Malhotra,&nbsp;Adelaida Martinez,&nbsp;Lisa McKinley,&nbsp;Mara W Robinson,&nbsp;Sinikka Suominen,&nbsp;Akihiko Takushima,&nbsp;Evangelina Vazquez Curiel,&nbsp;Faye L Wachs,&nbsp;Adriaan O Grobbelaar","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Standardization of outcome measurement using a patient-centered approach in pediatric facial palsy may help aid the advancement of clinical care in this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a standardized outcome measurement set for pediatric patients with facial palsy through an international multidisciplinary group of health care professionals, researchers, and patients and patient representatives.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A working group of health care experts and patient representatives (n = 21), along with external reviewers, participated in the study. Seven teleconferences were conducted over a 9-month period between December 3, 2016, and September 23, 2017, under the guidance of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, each followed with a 2-round Delphi process to develop consensus. This process defined the scope, outcome domains, measurement tools, time points for measurements, and case-mix variables deemed essential to a standardized outcome measurement set. Each teleconference was informed by a comprehensive review of literature and through communication with patient advisory groups. Literature review of PubMed was conducted for research published between January 1, 1981, and November 30, 2016.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The study aim was to develop the outcomes and measures relevant to children with facial palsy as opposed to studying the effect of a particular intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 21 members of the working group included pediatric facial palsy experts from 9 countries. The literature review identified 1628 papers, of which 395 (24.3%) were screened and 83 (5.1%) were included for qualitative evaluation. A standard set of outcome measurements was designed by the working group to allow the recording of outcomes after all forms of surgical and nonsurgical facial palsy treatments among pediatric patients of all ages. Unilateral or bilateral, congenital or acquired, permanent or temporary, and single-territory or multiterritory facial palsy can be evaluated using this standard set. Functional, appearance, psychosocial, and administrative outcomes were selected for inclusion. Clinimetric and psychometric outcome measurement tools (clinician-, patient-, and patient proxy-reported) and time points for measuring patient outcomes were established. Eighty-six independent reviews of the standard set were completed, and 34 (85%) of the 40 patients and patient representatives and 44 (96%) of the 46 health care professionals who participated in the reviews agreed that the standard set would capture the outcomes that matter most to children with facial palsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This international collaborative study produced a free standardized set of outcome measures for evaluating the quality of care provided to pediatric patients with facial palsy, allowing benchmarking of clinicians, comparison of treatment pathways, and introduction of value-based reimbursement strategies in the field of pediatric facial palsy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":"21 5","pages":"351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Importance: Standardization of outcome measurement using a patient-centered approach in pediatric facial palsy may help aid the advancement of clinical care in this population.

Objective: To develop a standardized outcome measurement set for pediatric patients with facial palsy through an international multidisciplinary group of health care professionals, researchers, and patients and patient representatives.

Design, setting, and participants: A working group of health care experts and patient representatives (n = 21), along with external reviewers, participated in the study. Seven teleconferences were conducted over a 9-month period between December 3, 2016, and September 23, 2017, under the guidance of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, each followed with a 2-round Delphi process to develop consensus. This process defined the scope, outcome domains, measurement tools, time points for measurements, and case-mix variables deemed essential to a standardized outcome measurement set. Each teleconference was informed by a comprehensive review of literature and through communication with patient advisory groups. Literature review of PubMed was conducted for research published between January 1, 1981, and November 30, 2016.

Main outcomes and measures: The study aim was to develop the outcomes and measures relevant to children with facial palsy as opposed to studying the effect of a particular intervention.

Results: The 21 members of the working group included pediatric facial palsy experts from 9 countries. The literature review identified 1628 papers, of which 395 (24.3%) were screened and 83 (5.1%) were included for qualitative evaluation. A standard set of outcome measurements was designed by the working group to allow the recording of outcomes after all forms of surgical and nonsurgical facial palsy treatments among pediatric patients of all ages. Unilateral or bilateral, congenital or acquired, permanent or temporary, and single-territory or multiterritory facial palsy can be evaluated using this standard set. Functional, appearance, psychosocial, and administrative outcomes were selected for inclusion. Clinimetric and psychometric outcome measurement tools (clinician-, patient-, and patient proxy-reported) and time points for measuring patient outcomes were established. Eighty-six independent reviews of the standard set were completed, and 34 (85%) of the 40 patients and patient representatives and 44 (96%) of the 46 health care professionals who participated in the reviews agreed that the standard set would capture the outcomes that matter most to children with facial palsy.

Conclusions and relevance: This international collaborative study produced a free standardized set of outcome measures for evaluating the quality of care provided to pediatric patients with facial palsy, allowing benchmarking of clinicians, comparison of treatment pathways, and introduction of value-based reimbursement strategies in the field of pediatric facial palsy.

Level of evidence: NA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项以儿童面瘫患者为中心的国际合作标准化结果测量。
重要性:在儿童面瘫中采用以患者为中心的方法进行标准化的结果测量可能有助于提高这一人群的临床护理水平。目的:通过一个由卫生保健专业人员、研究人员、患者和患者代表组成的国际多学科小组,为面瘫儿童患者制定一个标准化的结果测量集。设计、设置和参与者:由卫生保健专家和患者代表组成的工作组(n = 21)以及外部审稿人参与了本研究。在国际健康结果测量联盟的指导下,在2016年12月3日至2017年9月23日的9个月期间进行了7次电话会议,每次会议都进行了2轮德尔菲过程以形成共识。这个过程定义了范围、结果域、测量工具、测量时间点,以及对标准化结果测量集至关重要的病例组合变量。每次电话会议都是通过对文献的全面回顾和与患者咨询小组的沟通来通知的。PubMed对1981年1月1日至2016年11月30日期间发表的研究进行文献综述。主要结果和措施:研究目的是制定与面瘫儿童相关的结果和措施,而不是研究特定干预措施的效果。结果:21名工作组成员包括来自9个国家的小儿面瘫专家。文献综述共纳入文献1628篇,筛选出395篇(24.3%),纳入83篇(5.1%)进行定性评价。工作组设计了一套标准的结果测量方法,以记录所有年龄的儿科患者在所有形式的手术和非手术面瘫治疗后的结果。单侧或双侧,先天性或后天性,永久性或暂时性,单领域或多领域面瘫可使用该标准集进行评估。功能、外观、社会心理和管理结果被选择纳入。建立了临床测量和心理测量结果测量工具(临床医生、患者和患者代理报告)和测量患者结果的时间点。对标准集进行了86项独立审查,40名患者和患者代表中有34名(85%)和46名参与审查的卫生保健专业人员中有44名(96%)同意标准集将捕获对面瘫儿童最重要的结果。结论和相关性:这项国际合作研究产生了一套免费的标准化结果测量指标,用于评估儿科面瘫患者的护理质量,允许临床医生的基准,治疗途径的比较,以及在儿科面瘫领域引入基于价值的报销策略。证据等级:NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1