Specialist advice for primary care: an evaluation of a gastroenterology email advice service.

Alice L Fulton, Horace Rt Williams, Jayshree Shah, Lucy Phillips, Jonathan Fluxman, Jonathan M Hoare
{"title":"Specialist advice for primary care: an evaluation of a gastroenterology email advice service.","authors":"Alice L Fulton,&nbsp;Horace Rt Williams,&nbsp;Jayshree Shah,&nbsp;Lucy Phillips,&nbsp;Jonathan Fluxman,&nbsp;Jonathan M Hoare","doi":"10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Communication between primary and secondary care -physicians is often unreliable and one sided in the form of clinic letters. Alternatively, general practitioners (GPs) may have difficulty contacting an on-call specialist via outdated hospital paging services. At Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, a gastroenterology email advice line was set up to promote dialogue and potentially help GPs deal with issues within their practices. The service has been evaluated both objectively through analysis of enquiries and subjectively through a -survey of GPs' views. Analysis showed a very high level of satisfaction among users of the service. There is also good evidence to suggest that the service has helped to streamline patient management and led to the avoidance of some outpatient appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"90-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465828/pdf/futurehosp-3-2-90.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Communication between primary and secondary care -physicians is often unreliable and one sided in the form of clinic letters. Alternatively, general practitioners (GPs) may have difficulty contacting an on-call specialist via outdated hospital paging services. At Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, a gastroenterology email advice line was set up to promote dialogue and potentially help GPs deal with issues within their practices. The service has been evaluated both objectively through analysis of enquiries and subjectively through a -survey of GPs' views. Analysis showed a very high level of satisfaction among users of the service. There is also good evidence to suggest that the service has helped to streamline patient management and led to the avoidance of some outpatient appointments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健专家建议:胃肠病学电子邮件咨询服务的评估。
初级保健医生和二级保健医生之间的沟通往往是不可靠的,而且以门诊信件的形式是片面的。另外,全科医生(全科医生)可能很难通过过时的医院寻呼服务联系到随叫随到的专家。在帝国理工学院医疗保健NHS信托基金,建立了一条胃肠病学电子邮件咨询热线,以促进对话,并可能帮助全科医生处理他们实践中的问题。通过对查询的客观分析和对全科医生意见的主观调查,对该服务进行了评估。分析显示,用户对这项服务的满意度非常高。也有充分的证据表明,该服务有助于简化患者管理,并导致避免一些门诊预约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shifting the focus: A QI project to improve the management of delirium in patients with hip fracture. Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching. Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England. Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model. Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1