Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model.

Shuaib Quraishi, Winnie Wade, David Black
{"title":"Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model.","authors":"Shuaib Quraishi, Winnie Wade, David Black","doi":"10.7861/fhj.2018-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Shape of Training review and the General Medical Council (GMC) requirements in demonstrating generic professional capabilities were major drivers for the Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board (JRCPTB) to develop the new internal medicine curriculum. In particular, the GMC required progression to a more outcomes-based curriculum. The present curricula for physician training are based on demonstrating a large number of individual competencies that are assessed by a variety of different methods. It was felt that current system was overwhelming and had become a 'tick box' exercise. The new curriculum is based on a much smaller number of outcomes, called capabilities in practice, which reflect the key professional work activities of a fully trained physician. The aim is to re-emphasise the role of professional judgement in 'trusting' the work a trainee does and thus make assessment more realistic and meaningful for both trainees and trainers. The proof of concept study explored the feasibility of using this outcomes-based model of assessment in a UK NHS setting. The learning from the study has enabled us to make significant changes to the internal medicine curriculum. The GMC has recently approved the curriculum and the JRCPTB is implementing the programme from August 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"196-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2018-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Shape of Training review and the General Medical Council (GMC) requirements in demonstrating generic professional capabilities were major drivers for the Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board (JRCPTB) to develop the new internal medicine curriculum. In particular, the GMC required progression to a more outcomes-based curriculum. The present curricula for physician training are based on demonstrating a large number of individual competencies that are assessed by a variety of different methods. It was felt that current system was overwhelming and had become a 'tick box' exercise. The new curriculum is based on a much smaller number of outcomes, called capabilities in practice, which reflect the key professional work activities of a fully trained physician. The aim is to re-emphasise the role of professional judgement in 'trusting' the work a trainee does and thus make assessment more realistic and meaningful for both trainees and trainers. The proof of concept study explored the feasibility of using this outcomes-based model of assessment in a UK NHS setting. The learning from the study has enabled us to make significant changes to the internal medicine curriculum. The GMC has recently approved the curriculum and the JRCPTB is implementing the programme from August 2019.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发与GMC一致的内科课程,包括对“实践能力”作为课程模式的可接受性进行定性研究
英国皇家医师联合学院培训委员会(JRCPTB)开发新的内科课程的主要驱动力是培训形式审查和医学总委员会(GMC)对展示通用专业能力的要求。特别地,GMC要求学生向更加注重结果的课程发展。目前的医生培训课程是建立在展示大量的个人能力的基础上的,这些能力是通过各种不同的方法来评估的。人们认为,目前的制度是压倒性的,已经成为一个“打勾”的练习。新课程是基于更少的结果,称为实践能力,这反映了一个受过全面训练的医生的关键专业工作活动。其目的是再次强调专业判断在“信任”受训者所做的工作中的作用,从而使评估对受训者和培训师都更加现实和有意义。概念验证研究探讨了在英国国民保健服务设置中使用这种基于结果的评估模型的可行性。从研究中吸取的教训使我们能够对内科课程做出重大改变。GMC最近批准了该课程,JRCPTB将从2019年8月开始实施该课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shifting the focus: A QI project to improve the management of delirium in patients with hip fracture. Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching. Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England. Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model. Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1