The foundations of quality improvement science.

Julie E Reed, Nicola Davey, Thomas Woodcock
{"title":"The foundations of quality improvement science.","authors":"Julie E Reed, Nicola Davey, Thomas Woodcock","doi":"10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As an alternative to ‘big bang’ initiatives, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles are an increasingly popular approach to conducting tests of change to support quality improvement in healthcare. Using PDSA cycles can help clinicians deliver improvements in patient care through a structured experimental approach to learning and tests of change. The PDSA approach facilitates individual, team and organisational learning, making it an essential tool for the future hospital. This paper provides an example of the benefits of using PDSA in practice to test and develop a change idea to ensure it is fit for purpose. As with any new skill or competency, learning to use PDSA cycles takes time and practice and is necessary to ensure that the method is being used to its full effect. This paper explores some of the challenges encountered by clinicians in learning to use PDSA cycles well, and provides advice on how they can be overcome to help practitioners get more out of using the method.","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"199-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465814/pdf/futurehosp-3-3-199.pdf","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

ABSTRACT As an alternative to ‘big bang’ initiatives, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles are an increasingly popular approach to conducting tests of change to support quality improvement in healthcare. Using PDSA cycles can help clinicians deliver improvements in patient care through a structured experimental approach to learning and tests of change. The PDSA approach facilitates individual, team and organisational learning, making it an essential tool for the future hospital. This paper provides an example of the benefits of using PDSA in practice to test and develop a change idea to ensure it is fit for purpose. As with any new skill or competency, learning to use PDSA cycles takes time and practice and is necessary to ensure that the method is being used to its full effect. This paper explores some of the challenges encountered by clinicians in learning to use PDSA cycles well, and provides advice on how they can be overcome to help practitioners get more out of using the method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质量改进科学的基础。
作为“大爆炸”倡议的替代方案,计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环是一种越来越受欢迎的方法,用于进行变革测试,以支持医疗保健质量的改进。使用PDSA循环可以帮助临床医生通过结构化的实验方法来学习和测试变化,从而改善患者护理。PDSA方法促进了个人、团队和组织的学习,使其成为未来医院的重要工具。本文提供了在实践中使用PDSA来测试和开发更改想法以确保其适合目的的好处的示例。与任何新技能或能力一样,学习使用PDSA循环需要时间和实践,并且必须确保该方法得到充分利用。本文探讨了临床医生在学习使用PDSA循环时遇到的一些挑战,并就如何克服这些挑战提供了建议,以帮助从业者从使用该方法中获得更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shifting the focus: A QI project to improve the management of delirium in patients with hip fracture. Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching. Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England. Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model. Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1