Training healthcare professionals in quality improvement.

Calum Worsley, Stephen Webb, Emma Vaux
{"title":"Training healthcare professionals in quality improvement.","authors":"Calum Worsley,&nbsp;Stephen Webb,&nbsp;Emma Vaux","doi":"10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Academy of Medical Royal College's report <i>Quality improvement - training for better outcomes</i> sets a path for the normalisation of quality improvement as part of all health professionals' jobs. This accompanies similar calls to action by the King's Fund and the Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management and is aligned with NHS Improvement and Health Education England future strategies. These exhortations to action come on the backdrop of increased fiscal constraints within the NHS, low morale, a burgeoning volume of research evidence and audit outputs and increasing complexity of how we deliver care in a bewildering NHS landscape. Asking the question 'how can we do something better?' or 'do we really need to do this?', and building our resilience and capability to respond effectively gives us new purpose, the right skills and a means to influence and make a difference to the safety, -effectiveness and experience of patient care. Most importantly, we do this through harnessing the talents of -multiprofessional teams - with meaningful patient involvement - to rediscover the joy and optimism in our work and what truly motivates us and to see this translated into improved sustainable outcomes for our patients and our working days.</p>","PeriodicalId":92635,"journal":{"name":"Future hospital journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"207-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465816/pdf/futurehosp-3-3-207.pdf","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The Academy of Medical Royal College's report Quality improvement - training for better outcomes sets a path for the normalisation of quality improvement as part of all health professionals' jobs. This accompanies similar calls to action by the King's Fund and the Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management and is aligned with NHS Improvement and Health Education England future strategies. These exhortations to action come on the backdrop of increased fiscal constraints within the NHS, low morale, a burgeoning volume of research evidence and audit outputs and increasing complexity of how we deliver care in a bewildering NHS landscape. Asking the question 'how can we do something better?' or 'do we really need to do this?', and building our resilience and capability to respond effectively gives us new purpose, the right skills and a means to influence and make a difference to the safety, -effectiveness and experience of patient care. Most importantly, we do this through harnessing the talents of -multiprofessional teams - with meaningful patient involvement - to rediscover the joy and optimism in our work and what truly motivates us and to see this translated into improved sustainable outcomes for our patients and our working days.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培训医疗保健专业人员提高质量。
皇家医学院的报告《质量改进——为更好的结果进行培训》为质量改进作为所有卫生专业人员工作的一部分正常化指明了道路。这伴随着国王基金和医学领导与管理学院的类似行动呼吁,并与NHS改进和英格兰健康教育未来战略保持一致。这些对行动的劝告是在国民保健服务日益增加的财政限制、士气低落、大量研究证据和审计输出以及我们如何在令人困惑的国民保健服务环境中提供护理的日益复杂的背景下出现的。问这样的问题“我们怎样才能做得更好?”或者“我们真的需要这么做吗?”’,建立我们的韧性和有效应对的能力给了我们新的目标、正确的技能和一种影响和改变病人护理的安全性、有效性和体验的方法。最重要的是,我们通过利用多专业团队的才能,在有意义的患者参与下,重新发现我们工作中的快乐和乐观,真正激励我们的是什么,并将其转化为改善患者和我们工作日的可持续成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shifting the focus: A QI project to improve the management of delirium in patients with hip fracture. Raising concerns in the current NHS climate: a qualitative study exploring junior doctors' attitudes to training and teaching. Freedom to speak up - the role of freedom to speak up guardians and the National Guardian's Office in England. Development of a GMC aligned curriculum for internal medicine including a qualitative study of the acceptability of 'capabilities in practice' as a curriculum model. Flipped learning: Turning medical education upside down.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1