Temperatures generated during implant site preparation with conventional drilling versus single-drill method: an ex-vivo human mandible study.

Q3 Medicine Minerva stomatologica Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6
Christian Bacci, Nicola Lucchiari, Anna C Frigo, Carla Stecco, Gastone Zanette, Virginia Dotto, Stefano Sivolella
{"title":"Temperatures generated during implant site preparation with conventional drilling versus single-drill method: an ex-vivo human mandible study.","authors":"Christian Bacci,&nbsp;Nicola Lucchiari,&nbsp;Anna C Frigo,&nbsp;Carla Stecco,&nbsp;Gastone Zanette,&nbsp;Virginia Dotto,&nbsp;Stefano Sivolella","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBone overheating during osteotomy is a potential cause of necrosis and consequent failure of dental implant osseointegration. The aim of this study is to identify any differences between conventional osteotomy with drills of increasing size and the use of a single drill in terms of the temperature increase in the bone during implant site preparation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThirty-eight implant sites were prepared in ex vivo human mandibles, 19 using the conventional method with drills of increasing diameter (group A) and 19 using a single-drill method (group B), with no irrigation in either procedure. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature difference (T°) induced by the drills at each site. Student's t-test (with P<0.05) was used to compare the temperature increase induced by the last drill in group A, and by the single drill in group B.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean ΔT° in group A was 0.64 °C, while in group B it was 1.47 °C. The difference between the temperatures obtained in the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0073).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn statistical terms, the two methods differ significantly in the temperature increase induced by the drilling procedure, but this difference is clinically irrelevant.","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"68 6","pages":"277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04142-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bone overheating during osteotomy is a potential cause of necrosis and consequent failure of dental implant osseointegration. The aim of this study is to identify any differences between conventional osteotomy with drills of increasing size and the use of a single drill in terms of the temperature increase in the bone during implant site preparation. METHODS Thirty-eight implant sites were prepared in ex vivo human mandibles, 19 using the conventional method with drills of increasing diameter (group A) and 19 using a single-drill method (group B), with no irrigation in either procedure. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature difference (T°) induced by the drills at each site. Student's t-test (with P<0.05) was used to compare the temperature increase induced by the last drill in group A, and by the single drill in group B. RESULTS The mean ΔT° in group A was 0.64 °C, while in group B it was 1.47 °C. The difference between the temperatures obtained in the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0073). CONCLUSIONS In statistical terms, the two methods differ significantly in the temperature increase induced by the drilling procedure, but this difference is clinically irrelevant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规钻孔与单钻方法制备种植体部位时产生的温度:一项离体人类下颌骨研究。
背景:截骨术中骨过热是导致牙种植体骨融合失败的潜在原因。本研究的目的是确定在种植体部位准备过程中,使用越来越大的钻头的常规截骨术与使用单个钻头在骨内温度升高方面的差异。方法:在离体人下颌骨上制备种植体38个位点,其中常规增径钻法19个(A组),单钻法19个(B组),两种方法均不冲洗。利用红外测温仪测量各部位钻头产生的温差(T°)。学生t检验(结果:A组平均ΔT°为0.64°C, B组平均ΔT°为1.47°C)。两组测得的温度差异有统计学意义(P=0.0073)。结论:在统计学上,两种方法在钻孔过程中引起的温度升高有显著差异,但这种差异在临床上无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva stomatologica
Minerva stomatologica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Extranodal B-cell marginal zone lymphoma arising in the context of a lympho-epithelial cyst of the parotid gland in a patient with clonal B-cell lymphocytosis: report of the first case. Sexual dimorphism and infra orbital foramen: a computerized tomography-Scan study in a coorte of Senegalese population. Correlation between Vista Cam, ICDAS-II, X-ray bitewings and cavity extent after lesion excavation: an in-vivo pilot study. Assessment of the configuration of the mandibular canal using cone beam computed tomography. Direct oral anticoagulants in oral surgery: a prospective cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1