Outcomes Standardisation Project (OSP) for Continuing Medical Education (CE/CME) Professionals: Background, Methods, and Initial Terms and Definitions.

Journal of European CME Pub Date : 2020-02-13 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21614083.2020.1717187
Brian S McGowan, Anthia Mandarakas, Sue McGuinness, Jason Olivieri, Karyn Ruiz-Cordell, Greg Salinas, Wendy Turell
{"title":"Outcomes Standardisation Project (OSP) for Continuing Medical Education (CE/CME) Professionals: Background, Methods, and Initial Terms and Definitions.","authors":"Brian S McGowan,&nbsp;Anthia Mandarakas,&nbsp;Sue McGuinness,&nbsp;Jason Olivieri,&nbsp;Karyn Ruiz-Cordell,&nbsp;Greg Salinas,&nbsp;Wendy Turell","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2020.1717187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite an increased focus and urgency for CE/CME professionals to effectively and systematically assess the impact of their educational interventions, the community has struggled to do so. This struggle is in large part due to the lack of a standardised outcomes language and a set of unified approaches to measure and communicate impact. In the spring of 2018, a group of volunteer educational research scientists and CE/CME professionals established a rigorous consensus-building process in an effort to address this need. This report describes the background, methods and first-year output (Glossary V1) of the Outcomes Standardisation Project (OSP); begins to introduce examples of how the OSP Glossary V1 may support the CE/CME professional community and concludes with plans for the future of establishing a common framework for the profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"9 1","pages":"1717187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1717187","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1717187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite an increased focus and urgency for CE/CME professionals to effectively and systematically assess the impact of their educational interventions, the community has struggled to do so. This struggle is in large part due to the lack of a standardised outcomes language and a set of unified approaches to measure and communicate impact. In the spring of 2018, a group of volunteer educational research scientists and CE/CME professionals established a rigorous consensus-building process in an effort to address this need. This report describes the background, methods and first-year output (Glossary V1) of the Outcomes Standardisation Project (OSP); begins to introduce examples of how the OSP Glossary V1 may support the CE/CME professional community and concludes with plans for the future of establishing a common framework for the profession.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
继续医学教育(CE/CME)专业人员的结果标准化项目(OSP):背景、方法、初始术语和定义。
尽管CE/CME专业人员越来越关注和迫切需要有效和系统地评估其教育干预措施的影响,但社区一直在努力做到这一点。这在很大程度上是由于缺乏一种标准化的结果语言和一套衡量和传达影响的统一方法。2018年春天,一群志愿教育研究科学家和CE/CME专业人士建立了一个严格的共识建立过程,以满足这一需求。本报告描述了成果标准化项目(OSP)的背景、方法和第一年的产出(词汇表V1);开始介绍OSP Glossary V1如何支持CE/CME专业社区的示例,并以为该专业建立通用框架的未来计划结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education? Personalised versus non-individualised case-based CME: A randomised pilot study. A European Approach to Micro-credentials for Lifelong Learning and Employability. Leading Change Together: Supporting Collaborative Practice through Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education. Preparing the Leaders of Tomorrow: Learnings from a Two-Year Community of Practice in Fragility Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1