Toward Improving Patient Safety and Surgeon Comfort in a Synergic Robot-Assisted Eye Surgery: A Comparative Study.

Ali Ebrahimi, Farshid Alambeigi, Ingrid E Zimmer-Galler, Peter Gehlbach, Russell H Taylor, Iulian Iordachita
{"title":"Toward Improving Patient Safety and Surgeon Comfort in a Synergic Robot-Assisted Eye Surgery: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Ali Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Farshid Alambeigi,&nbsp;Ingrid E Zimmer-Galler,&nbsp;Peter Gehlbach,&nbsp;Russell H Taylor,&nbsp;Iulian Iordachita","doi":"10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When robotic assistance is present into vitreoretinal surgery, the surgeon will experience reduced sensory input that is otherwise derived from the tool's interaction with the eye wall (sclera). We speculate that disconnecting the surgeon from this sensory input may increase the risk of injury to the eye and affect the surgeon's usual technique. On the other hand, robot autonomous motion to enhance patient safety might inhibit the surgeons tool manipulation and diminish surgeon comfort with the procedure. In this study, to investigate the parameters of patient safety and surgeon comfort in a robot-assisted eye surgery, we implemented three different approaches designed to keep the scleral force in a safe range during a synergic eye manipulation task. To assess the surgeon comfort during these procedures, the amount of interference with the surgeons usual maneuvers has been analyzed by defining quantitative comfort metrics. The first two utilized scleral force control approaches are based on an adaptive force control method in which the robot actively counteracts any excessive force on the sclera. The third control method is based on a virtual fixture approach in which a virtual wall is created for the surgeon in the unsafe directions of manipulation. The performance of the utilized approaches was evaluated in user studies with two experienced retinal surgeons and the outcomes of the procedure were assessed using the defined safety and comfort metrics. Results of these analyses indicate the significance of the opted control paradigm on the outcome of a safe and comfortable robot-assisted eye surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":74523,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems","volume":"2019 ","pages":"7075-7082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967806","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

When robotic assistance is present into vitreoretinal surgery, the surgeon will experience reduced sensory input that is otherwise derived from the tool's interaction with the eye wall (sclera). We speculate that disconnecting the surgeon from this sensory input may increase the risk of injury to the eye and affect the surgeon's usual technique. On the other hand, robot autonomous motion to enhance patient safety might inhibit the surgeons tool manipulation and diminish surgeon comfort with the procedure. In this study, to investigate the parameters of patient safety and surgeon comfort in a robot-assisted eye surgery, we implemented three different approaches designed to keep the scleral force in a safe range during a synergic eye manipulation task. To assess the surgeon comfort during these procedures, the amount of interference with the surgeons usual maneuvers has been analyzed by defining quantitative comfort metrics. The first two utilized scleral force control approaches are based on an adaptive force control method in which the robot actively counteracts any excessive force on the sclera. The third control method is based on a virtual fixture approach in which a virtual wall is created for the surgeon in the unsafe directions of manipulation. The performance of the utilized approaches was evaluated in user studies with two experienced retinal surgeons and the outcomes of the procedure were assessed using the defined safety and comfort metrics. Results of these analyses indicate the significance of the opted control paradigm on the outcome of a safe and comfortable robot-assisted eye surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在协同机器人辅助眼科手术中提高患者安全和外科医生舒适度:一项比较研究。
当机器人辅助进行玻璃体视网膜手术时,外科医生将体验到由于工具与眼壁(巩膜)相互作用而产生的感觉输入减少。我们推测,切断外科医生与这种感觉输入的联系可能会增加眼睛受伤的风险,并影响外科医生的常规技术。另一方面,为了提高患者的安全性,机器人的自主运动可能会抑制外科医生对工具的操作,降低外科医生对手术的舒适度。在这项研究中,为了研究机器人辅助眼科手术中患者安全和外科医生舒适度的参数,我们实施了三种不同的方法,旨在在协同眼睛操作任务中保持巩膜力在安全范围内。为了评估外科医生在这些过程中的舒适度,通过定义定量的舒适度指标来分析对外科医生常规操作的干扰量。前两种巩膜力控制方法基于一种自适应力控制方法,其中机器人主动抵消任何施加在巩膜上的过大力。第三种控制方法是基于虚拟夹具方法,在不安全的操作方向上为外科医生创建虚拟墙。在两名经验丰富的视网膜外科医生的用户研究中评估了所使用方法的性能,并使用定义的安全性和舒适性指标评估了手术结果。这些分析的结果表明,选择的控制范式对安全舒适的机器人辅助眼科手术结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FBG-based Shape-Sensing to Enable Lateral Deflection Methods of Autonomous Needle Insertion. An Energetic Approach to Task-Invariant Ankle Exoskeleton Control. Controlling Powered Prosthesis Kinematics over Continuous Transitions Between Walk and Stair Ascent. Effects of Personalization on Gait-State Tracking Performance Using Extended Kalman Filters. Improving Amputee Endurance over Activities of Daily Living with a Robotic Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1