The Distribution of Talker Variability Impacts Infants' Word Learning.

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Laboratory Phonology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-05 DOI:10.5334/labphon.25
Carolyn Quam, Sara Knight, LouAnn Gerken
{"title":"The Distribution of Talker Variability Impacts Infants' Word Learning.","authors":"Carolyn Quam, Sara Knight, LouAnn Gerken","doi":"10.5334/labphon.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infants struggle to apply earlier-demonstrated sound-discrimination abilities to later word learning, attending to non-constrastive acoustic dimensions (e.g., Hay et al., 2015), and not always to contrastive dimensions (e.g., Stager & Werker, 1997). One hint about the nature of infants' difficulties comes from the observation that input from multiple talkers can improve word learning (Rost & McMurray, 2009). This may be because, when a single talker says both of the to-be-learned words, consistent talker's-voice characteristics make the acoustics of the two words more overlapping (Apfelbaum & McMurray, 2011). Here, we test that notion. We taught 14-month-old infants two similar-sounding words in the Switch habituation paradigm. The same amount of overall talker variability was present as in prior multiple-talker experiments, but male and female talkers said different words, creating a gender-word correlation. Under an acoustic-similarity account, correlated talker gender should help to separate words acoustically and facilitate learning. Instead, we found that correlated talker gender impaired learning of word-object pairings compared with uncorrelated talker gender-even when gender-word pairings were always maintained in test-casting doubt on one account of the beneficial effects of talker variability. We discuss several alternate potential explanations for this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":45128,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Phonology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351124/pdf/nihms-1605618.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Phonology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infants struggle to apply earlier-demonstrated sound-discrimination abilities to later word learning, attending to non-constrastive acoustic dimensions (e.g., Hay et al., 2015), and not always to contrastive dimensions (e.g., Stager & Werker, 1997). One hint about the nature of infants' difficulties comes from the observation that input from multiple talkers can improve word learning (Rost & McMurray, 2009). This may be because, when a single talker says both of the to-be-learned words, consistent talker's-voice characteristics make the acoustics of the two words more overlapping (Apfelbaum & McMurray, 2011). Here, we test that notion. We taught 14-month-old infants two similar-sounding words in the Switch habituation paradigm. The same amount of overall talker variability was present as in prior multiple-talker experiments, but male and female talkers said different words, creating a gender-word correlation. Under an acoustic-similarity account, correlated talker gender should help to separate words acoustically and facilitate learning. Instead, we found that correlated talker gender impaired learning of word-object pairings compared with uncorrelated talker gender-even when gender-word pairings were always maintained in test-casting doubt on one account of the beneficial effects of talker variability. We discuss several alternate potential explanations for this effect.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说话者变异性的分布影响婴儿的单词学习
婴儿很难将早期表现出来的声音辨别能力应用到后来的单词学习中,他们只关注非对比的声音维度(如 Hay 等人,2015 年),而不总是关注对比维度(如 Stager & Werker,1997 年)。关于婴儿学习困难的本质,有一个提示,即观察到来自多个说话者的输入可以改善单词学习(Rost & McMurray, 2009)。这可能是因为,当一个说话者同时说出两个要学习的单词时,说话者声音的一致性特征会使两个单词的声学特征更加重叠(Apfelbaum & McMurray, 2011)。在此,我们对这一观点进行了验证。我们在交换习惯范例中教 14 个月大的婴儿学习两个发音相似的单词。与之前的多说话者实验一样,说话者的整体可变性也是存在的,但是男性和女性说话者说的是不同的单词,这就产生了性别-单词相关性。根据声学相似性理论,相关的说话者性别应有助于从声学上区分单词并促进学习。相反,我们发现,与不相关的说话者性别相比,相关的说话者性别会影响词-物配对的学习--即使在测试中性别-词配对始终保持不变--这让我们对说话者变异性的有利影响产生了怀疑。我们讨论了这种效应的几种可能的替代解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Probing effects of lexical prosody on speech-gesture integration in prominence production by Swedish news presenters Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Producing and Perceiving Socially Structured Coarticulation: Coarticulatory Nasalization in Afrikaans Measuring sign complexity: Comparing a model-driven and an error-driven approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1