Producing and Perceiving Socially Structured Coarticulation: Coarticulatory Nasalization in Afrikaans

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Laboratory Phonology Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.16995/labphon.6450
A. Coetzee, P. S. Beddor, Will Styler, S. Tobin, I. Bekker, D. Wissing
{"title":"Producing and Perceiving Socially Structured Coarticulation: Coarticulatory Nasalization in Afrikaans","authors":"A. Coetzee, P. S. Beddor, Will Styler, S. Tobin, I. Bekker, D. Wissing","doi":"10.16995/labphon.6450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most theories of phonetics assume a tight relation between production and perception, and recent years have also seen increasing evidence for such a relation at the level of the individual. For the most part, however, this evidence comes from socially homogeneous speech communities where the targeted pattern of variation is mostly socially neutral. What implication might socially structured phonetic variation in the speech community have for the perception-production link? If listeners can predict the phonetic patterns of a talker based on the talker’s actual or assumed identity, would they adjust their perceptual strategies accordingly, possibly weakening the link between their own production and perception patterns? This study reports the results of a pair of experiments that investigate the production and perception of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in Afrikaans, a language for which variation in coarticulatory nasalization is socially structured. Relying on nasal airflow measures, the production experiment showed that speakers of White Afrikaans produce more extensive coarticulatory nasalization than speakers of Kleurling Afrikaans. The perception experiment used an eye-tracking paradigm to assess listeners’ perceptual reliance on coarticulatory nasalization, and found (i) that Afrikaans speakers’ use of coarticulatory nasalization in production predicts their perceptual reliance on this information, (ii) that they rapidly adjust to the coarticulatory timing patterns in the speech of other speakers, but also (iii) that they do not adjust their perceptual reliance on coarticulation in response to the assumed identity of the speaker. The link between perception and production therefore persists, even in this situation of socially structured variation in coarticulatory timing.","PeriodicalId":45128,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Phonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Phonology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most theories of phonetics assume a tight relation between production and perception, and recent years have also seen increasing evidence for such a relation at the level of the individual. For the most part, however, this evidence comes from socially homogeneous speech communities where the targeted pattern of variation is mostly socially neutral. What implication might socially structured phonetic variation in the speech community have for the perception-production link? If listeners can predict the phonetic patterns of a talker based on the talker’s actual or assumed identity, would they adjust their perceptual strategies accordingly, possibly weakening the link between their own production and perception patterns? This study reports the results of a pair of experiments that investigate the production and perception of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in Afrikaans, a language for which variation in coarticulatory nasalization is socially structured. Relying on nasal airflow measures, the production experiment showed that speakers of White Afrikaans produce more extensive coarticulatory nasalization than speakers of Kleurling Afrikaans. The perception experiment used an eye-tracking paradigm to assess listeners’ perceptual reliance on coarticulatory nasalization, and found (i) that Afrikaans speakers’ use of coarticulatory nasalization in production predicts their perceptual reliance on this information, (ii) that they rapidly adjust to the coarticulatory timing patterns in the speech of other speakers, but also (iii) that they do not adjust their perceptual reliance on coarticulation in response to the assumed identity of the speaker. The link between perception and production therefore persists, even in this situation of socially structured variation in coarticulatory timing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产生和感知社会结构的协同发音:南非荷兰语的协同发音鼻化
大多数语音学理论都认为产生和感知之间存在密切关系,近年来也有越来越多的证据表明在个人层面上存在这种关系。然而,在大多数情况下,这一证据来自社会同质的语言社区,其中目标变异模式大多是社会中立的。语言群体中社会结构的语音变异对感知-产生联系有什么暗示?如果听者可以根据说话者的实际身份或假设身份来预测说话者的语音模式,他们是否会相应地调整自己的感知策略,从而可能削弱自己的产出和感知模式之间的联系?本研究报告了一对实验的结果,研究了南非荷兰语中协同发音元音鼻音的产生和感知,这种语言的协同发音鼻音变化是社会结构的。依靠鼻腔气流测量,生产实验表明,白人南非荷兰语的使用者比克勒林南非荷兰语的使用者产生更广泛的协同发音。感知实验使用眼动追踪范式来评估听者对协同发音鼻音的感知依赖,发现(i)南非荷兰语使用者在生产中使用协同发音鼻音预测了他们对该信息的感知依赖,(ii)他们迅速适应其他说话者讲话中的协同发音时间模式。但也(iii)他们没有调整对协同发音的感知依赖,以回应假设的说话者身份。因此,感知和生产之间的联系仍然存在,即使在协同发音时间的社会结构变化的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Probing effects of lexical prosody on speech-gesture integration in prominence production by Swedish news presenters Production and perception across three Hong Kong Cantonese consonant mergers: Community- and individual-level perspectives Producing and Perceiving Socially Structured Coarticulation: Coarticulatory Nasalization in Afrikaans Measuring sign complexity: Comparing a model-driven and an error-driven approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1