Insulin Use, Diabetes Control, and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine Research Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-04 DOI:10.1080/07435800.2020.1856865
Shayan Riahi, Lorenna Rodrigues Silva Sombra, Kevin Bryan Lo, Shireen R Chacko, Alvaro Goncalves Mendes Neto, Zurab Azmaiparashvili, Gabriel Patarroyo-Aponte, Janani Rangaswami, Catherine Anastasopoulou
{"title":"Insulin Use, Diabetes Control, and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19.","authors":"Shayan Riahi,&nbsp;Lorenna Rodrigues Silva Sombra,&nbsp;Kevin Bryan Lo,&nbsp;Shireen R Chacko,&nbsp;Alvaro Goncalves Mendes Neto,&nbsp;Zurab Azmaiparashvili,&nbsp;Gabriel Patarroyo-Aponte,&nbsp;Janani Rangaswami,&nbsp;Catherine Anastasopoulou","doi":"10.1080/07435800.2020.1856865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The novel coronavirus (SARS CoV-2) has caused significant morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. However, the effects of diabetes control including insulin use remain uncertain in terms of clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19.<b>Methods</b>: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, all adult patients admitted to Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, from March 1 through April 24, 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and diabetes were included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, insulin dose at home and at the hospital, other anti-hyperglycemic agents use, and outcomes were obtained. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with diabetes control and mortality.<b>Results</b>: Patients who used insulin at home had higher mortality compared to those who did not (35% vs 18% <i>p</i> = .015), this was true even after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities and a1c OR 2.65 95% CI (1.23-5.71) <i>p</i> = .013. However, the mean a1c and the median home requirements of insulin did not significantly differ among patients who died compared to the ones that survived. Patients who died had significantly higher inpatient insulin requirements (highest day insulin requirement recorded in units during hospitalization) 36 (11-86) vs 21 (8-52) <i>p</i> = .043 despite similar baseline a1c and steroid doses received. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities and a1c, peak insulin requirements remained significantly associated with inpatient mortality OR 1.022 95% CI (1.00-1.04) <i>p</i> = .044.<b>Conclusion</b>: Among diabetic patients infected with COVID-19, insulin therapy at home was significantly independently associated with increased mortality. Peak daily inpatient insulin requirements was also independently associated with increased inpatient mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11601,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Research","volume":"46 2","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07435800.2020.1856865","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07435800.2020.1856865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background: The novel coronavirus (SARS CoV-2) has caused significant morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. However, the effects of diabetes control including insulin use remain uncertain in terms of clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19.Methods: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, all adult patients admitted to Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, from March 1 through April 24, 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and diabetes were included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, insulin dose at home and at the hospital, other anti-hyperglycemic agents use, and outcomes were obtained. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with diabetes control and mortality.Results: Patients who used insulin at home had higher mortality compared to those who did not (35% vs 18% p = .015), this was true even after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities and a1c OR 2.65 95% CI (1.23-5.71) p = .013. However, the mean a1c and the median home requirements of insulin did not significantly differ among patients who died compared to the ones that survived. Patients who died had significantly higher inpatient insulin requirements (highest day insulin requirement recorded in units during hospitalization) 36 (11-86) vs 21 (8-52) p = .043 despite similar baseline a1c and steroid doses received. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities and a1c, peak insulin requirements remained significantly associated with inpatient mortality OR 1.022 95% CI (1.00-1.04) p = .044.Conclusion: Among diabetic patients infected with COVID-19, insulin therapy at home was significantly independently associated with increased mortality. Peak daily inpatient insulin requirements was also independently associated with increased inpatient mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19患者胰岛素使用、糖尿病控制和结局
背景:新型冠状病毒(SARS CoV-2)在糖尿病患者中引起了显著的发病率和死亡率。然而,就COVID-19患者的临床结局而言,包括使用胰岛素在内的糖尿病控制的效果仍不确定。方法:在这项单中心、回顾性观察性研究中,纳入了2020年3月1日至4月24日在费城爱因斯坦医学中心收治的所有诊断为COVID-19和糖尿病的成年患者。获得了人口统计学、临床和实验室数据、家庭和医院的胰岛素剂量、其他抗高血糖药物的使用和结果。采用多因素logistic回归评价与糖尿病控制和死亡率相关的因素。结果:在家使用胰岛素的患者比不使用胰岛素的患者死亡率更高(35% vs 18% p = 0.015),即使在调整了人口统计学、合共病和糖化血红蛋白OR 2.65 95% CI (1.23-5.71) p = 0.013后也是如此。然而,死亡患者与存活患者的平均糖化血红蛋白和胰岛素需要量中位数没有显著差异。尽管接受的基线糖化血红蛋白和类固醇剂量相似,但死亡患者的住院胰岛素需要量(住院期间单位记录的最高日胰岛素需要量)明显更高(36 (11-86)vs 21 (8-52) p = 0.043)。在调整了人口统计学、合并症和糖化血红蛋白后,胰岛素峰值需求仍然与住院患者死亡率显著相关(OR 1.022), 95% CI (1.00-1.04) p = 0.044。结论:在感染COVID-19的糖尿病患者中,在家胰岛素治疗与死亡率增加有显著独立相关。住院患者每日胰岛素需要量高峰也与住院患者死亡率增加独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine Research
Endocrine Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles relating to endocrinology in the broadest context. Subjects of interest include: receptors and mechanism of action of hormones, methodological advances in the detection and measurement of hormones; structure and chemical properties of hormones. Invitations to submit Brief Reviews are issued to specific authors by the Editors.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Serum Uric Acid and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Study in Chinese Women. Pancreatic β-Cells, Diabetes and Autophagy. Antithyroid Antibodies and Reproductive Parameters of Women with Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. Adverse Events of Adjuvant Mitotane Treatment for Adrenocortical Carcinoma Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1