Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection: Effect Size Benchmarking for Internet-based Enduring CME Activities.

Jason J Olivieri, Mary Catherine Downes
{"title":"Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection: Effect Size Benchmarking for Internet-based Enduring CME Activities.","authors":"Jason J Olivieri,&nbsp;Mary Catherine Downes","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2020.1832796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The volume of certified, internet enduring materials produced per year has nearly doubled in the last decade. Meta-analyses indicate that Internet-based education for clinicians is effective; however, the relevance of these studies to the nearly 50,000 such activities certified per year is questionable. Effect size is one metric by which CME providers may assess effectiveness, but caution must be used in comparing effect size data with external benchmarks such as peer-reviewed literature. This report presents a pooled standardised mean difference (Cohen's <i>d</i>) for 40 accredited, Internet-based enduring materials produced between 2016 and 2018. Data suggests that a Cohen's <i>d</i> between 0.48 and 0.75 may be a useful benchmark. Benchmarks reported in the literature for this format are notably higher. The limitations of comparison to such benchmarks are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"9 1","pages":"1832796"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1832796","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1832796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The volume of certified, internet enduring materials produced per year has nearly doubled in the last decade. Meta-analyses indicate that Internet-based education for clinicians is effective; however, the relevance of these studies to the nearly 50,000 such activities certified per year is questionable. Effect size is one metric by which CME providers may assess effectiveness, but caution must be used in comparing effect size data with external benchmarks such as peer-reviewed literature. This report presents a pooled standardised mean difference (Cohen's d) for 40 accredited, Internet-based enduring materials produced between 2016 and 2018. Data suggests that a Cohen's d between 0.48 and 0.75 may be a useful benchmark. Benchmarks reported in the literature for this format are notably higher. The limitations of comparison to such benchmarks are considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CME/CPD的结果-特别集:基于互联网的持续CME活动的效应大小基准。
在过去十年中,每年生产的经过认证的互联网耐用材料的数量几乎翻了一番。meta分析表明,网络教育对临床医生是有效的;然而,这些研究与每年核证的近5万项此类活动的相关性值得怀疑。效应量是CME提供者评估有效性的一个指标,但在将效应量数据与外部基准(如同行评议文献)进行比较时必须谨慎。本报告提供了2016年至2018年间生产的40种经认证的基于互联网的耐用材料的汇总标准化平均差(科恩d)。数据显示,0.48到0.75之间的科恩d值可能是一个有用的基准。文献中报告的这种格式的基准要高得多。考虑了与这些基准进行比较的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Net Promoter Score (NPS): What Does Net Promoter Score Offer in the Evaluation of Continuing Medical Education? Personalised versus non-individualised case-based CME: A randomised pilot study. A European Approach to Micro-credentials for Lifelong Learning and Employability. Leading Change Together: Supporting Collaborative Practice through Joint Accreditation for Interprofessional Continuing Education. Preparing the Leaders of Tomorrow: Learnings from a Two-Year Community of Practice in Fragility Fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1