Pilot Study of Educational Interventions for Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Sibling Donors to Increase Knowledge of Donation and Transplantation Procedures.

Lori Wiener, Richard W Childs, Nirali N Shah
{"title":"Pilot Study of Educational Interventions for Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Sibling Donors to Increase Knowledge of Donation and Transplantation Procedures.","authors":"Lori Wiener,&nbsp;Richard W Childs,&nbsp;Nirali N Shah","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Siblings are frequently identified as a tissue match for patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases and are selected to donate hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Research on preparing siblings donors for stem cell donation is limited. Even after donation procedures are explained, siblings have been found to have difficulty understanding the information and may experience anxiety, particularly amongst younger donors. No prospective studies examining educational tools and transplant knowledge in sibling stem cell donors are currently available. This pilot study assessed donor comprehension of HSC donation procedures and compared knowledge prior to and post an educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assessment of baseline knowledge regarding HSC donation was assessed before and after the consent/information meeting with the medical team. Donors were then stratified into 2 groups by age. Donors aged 10 to 15 played an adapted version of the therapeutic game <i>ShopTalk</i> and donors aged 16 to 25 were provided a workbook designed for sibling stem cell donors. Assessment of knowledge was repeated 24 hours after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 17 siblings of pediatric transplant recipients, ages 10-25. Mean knowledge scores increased from 59.6% to 68.8% following the meeting with the medical provider and further increased to 88.5% after an educational intervention. Results suggest that education that provides information via a game or workbook increases knowledge in sibling donors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited interactive educational material on stem cell donation is available for pediatric HSC donors. Additional visual and/or interactive information for sibling donors may increase knowledge and perhaps comfort with the donation process, beyond that which is provided by the medical teams. Providing detailed information about donation and discussion of procedures should be tailored to the individual learning style and supplemented with additional visual information.</p>","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000004","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Siblings are frequently identified as a tissue match for patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases and are selected to donate hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). Research on preparing siblings donors for stem cell donation is limited. Even after donation procedures are explained, siblings have been found to have difficulty understanding the information and may experience anxiety, particularly amongst younger donors. No prospective studies examining educational tools and transplant knowledge in sibling stem cell donors are currently available. This pilot study assessed donor comprehension of HSC donation procedures and compared knowledge prior to and post an educational intervention.

Methods: Assessment of baseline knowledge regarding HSC donation was assessed before and after the consent/information meeting with the medical team. Donors were then stratified into 2 groups by age. Donors aged 10 to 15 played an adapted version of the therapeutic game ShopTalk and donors aged 16 to 25 were provided a workbook designed for sibling stem cell donors. Assessment of knowledge was repeated 24 hours after the intervention.

Results: Participants included 17 siblings of pediatric transplant recipients, ages 10-25. Mean knowledge scores increased from 59.6% to 68.8% following the meeting with the medical provider and further increased to 88.5% after an educational intervention. Results suggest that education that provides information via a game or workbook increases knowledge in sibling donors.

Conclusion: Limited interactive educational material on stem cell donation is available for pediatric HSC donors. Additional visual and/or interactive information for sibling donors may increase knowledge and perhaps comfort with the donation process, beyond that which is provided by the medical teams. Providing detailed information about donation and discussion of procedures should be tailored to the individual learning style and supplemented with additional visual information.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童造血干细胞同胞献血者教育干预的试点研究,以增加捐赠和移植程序的知识。
背景:兄弟姐妹经常被确定为恶性和非恶性疾病患者的组织匹配,并被选择捐献造血干细胞(HSC)。为干细胞捐赠准备兄弟姐妹供体的研究是有限的。即使在解释了捐赠程序之后,兄弟姐妹也很难理解这些信息,并且可能会感到焦虑,尤其是在年轻的捐赠者中。目前还没有前瞻性研究检查教育工具和兄弟姐妹干细胞供者的移植知识。这项初步研究评估了捐赠者对HSC捐赠程序的理解,并比较了教育干预前后的知识。方法:在与医疗团队的同意/信息会议前后评估关于HSC捐献的基线知识。然后将供体按年龄分为两组。10至15岁的捐赠者玩了一个改编版的治疗游戏ShopTalk,而16至25岁的捐赠者则获得了一本专为兄弟姐妹干细胞捐赠者设计的工作手册。干预后24小时重复知识评估。结果:参与者包括17名儿童移植受者的兄弟姐妹,年龄10-25岁。平均知识得分在与医疗提供者会面后从59.6%增加到68.8%,在教育干预后进一步增加到88.5%。结果表明,通过游戏或练习册提供信息的教育可以增加兄弟姐妹捐赠者的知识。结论:针对儿童造血干细胞供者的干细胞捐赠互动教育材料有限。除了医疗团队提供的信息外,为兄弟姐妹献血者提供额外的视觉和/或互动信息可能会增加对捐赠过程的了解和舒适度。提供有关捐赠和程序讨论的详细信息应根据个人学习方式进行调整,并辅以额外的视觉信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1