Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Netherlands Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01
K de Wit, O M van Delden, U Beuers, R B Takkenberg
{"title":"Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience.","authors":"K de Wit,&nbsp;O M van Delden,&nbsp;U Beuers,&nbsp;R B Takkenberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective intervention to treat complications of portal hypertension. Since the introduction of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stents, TIPS patency rates have improved, and the need for routine TIPS surveillance has become questionable. Aims of this study were to assess the indications, clinical outcome and survival, and yield of Doppler ultrasound follow-up in patients who received a TIPS in an academic centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of all adult consecutive patients who underwent PTFE-covered TIPS placement between 2001 and 2016. Clinical, biochemical, and imaging findings were reviewed and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were included for analysis. At one-year follow-up, control of bleeding was successful in 91% (41/45), and control of refractory ascites in 80% (8/10). In patients with variceal bleeding, a higher MELD score was a risk factor for 90-day mortality (HR 1.28 per point, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (HR 1.24 per point, p < 0.001). In patients with refractory ascites, a higher MELD score was only a risk factor for 90-day mortality (HR 1.13 per point, p = 0.03). Doppler ultrasound investigations during follow-up revealed abnormalities in 4% (6/166), all of which were associated with clinical deterioration, while abnormalities were detected in 11.4% (19/166) of patients who presented with clinical symptoms of TIPS dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of routine Doppler ultrasound follow-up after PTFE-covered TIPS placement seems unnecessary as it had a very low yield and abnormal Doppler findings were almost always associated with clinical symptoms of TIPS dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18918,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective intervention to treat complications of portal hypertension. Since the introduction of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stents, TIPS patency rates have improved, and the need for routine TIPS surveillance has become questionable. Aims of this study were to assess the indications, clinical outcome and survival, and yield of Doppler ultrasound follow-up in patients who received a TIPS in an academic centre.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all adult consecutive patients who underwent PTFE-covered TIPS placement between 2001 and 2016. Clinical, biochemical, and imaging findings were reviewed and analysed.

Results: A total of 103 patients were included for analysis. At one-year follow-up, control of bleeding was successful in 91% (41/45), and control of refractory ascites in 80% (8/10). In patients with variceal bleeding, a higher MELD score was a risk factor for 90-day mortality (HR 1.28 per point, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (HR 1.24 per point, p < 0.001). In patients with refractory ascites, a higher MELD score was only a risk factor for 90-day mortality (HR 1.13 per point, p = 0.03). Doppler ultrasound investigations during follow-up revealed abnormalities in 4% (6/166), all of which were associated with clinical deterioration, while abnormalities were detected in 11.4% (19/166) of patients who presented with clinical symptoms of TIPS dysfunction.

Conclusion: The use of routine Doppler ultrasound follow-up after PTFE-covered TIPS placement seems unnecessary as it had a very low yield and abnormal Doppler findings were almost always associated with clinical symptoms of TIPS dysfunction.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TIPS置入术后不常规进行多普勒随访。16年的单中心经验。
背景与目的:经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)是治疗门静脉高压症并发症的有效干预手段。自引入聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)覆盖支架以来,TIPS的通畅率有所提高,常规TIPS监测的必要性已成为问题。本研究的目的是评估在某学术中心接受TIPS的患者的适应症、临床结果、生存率和多普勒超声随访率。方法:一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2001年至2016年期间接受ptfe覆盖TIPS放置的所有连续成年患者。对临床、生化和影像学结果进行回顾和分析。结果:共纳入103例患者进行分析。随访1年,91%的患者成功控制出血(41/45),80%的患者成功控制难治性腹水(8/10)。在静脉曲张出血患者中,较高的MELD评分是90天死亡率(HR 1.28 /分,p < 0.001)和1年死亡率(HR 1.24 /分,p < 0.001)的危险因素。在难治性腹水患者中,较高的MELD评分仅是90天死亡率的一个危险因素(HR 1.13 /分,p = 0.03)。随访期间多普勒超声检查发现4%(6/166)的患者出现异常,均伴有临床恶化,而11.4%(19/166)的患者出现TIPS功能障碍的临床症状。结论:在ptfe覆盖的TIPS放置后,常规多普勒超声随访似乎是不必要的,因为它的发生率很低,异常的多普勒结果几乎总是与TIPS功能障碍的临床症状相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Netherlands Journal of Medicine publishes papers in all relevant fields of internal medicine. In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, reviews on topics of interest or importance, case reports, book reviews and letters to the editor are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Hypotonic polyuria: at the cross-roads of copeptin. Severe acute respiratory infections surveillance for early signals in the community. Implementation of 'Choosing Wisely Netherlands' for internal medicine. Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience. A healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to optimise the process of blood culture performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1