A healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to optimise the process of blood culture performance.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Netherlands Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-01
F V van Daalen, M Smeulers, E J H Bartels, F Holleman, C E Visser, S E Geerlings
{"title":"A healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to optimise the process of blood culture performance.","authors":"F V van Daalen,&nbsp;M Smeulers,&nbsp;E J H Bartels,&nbsp;F Holleman,&nbsp;C E Visser,&nbsp;S E Geerlings","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood cultures are essential diagnostic tools to identify pathogens in systemic infections. However, logistics of blood culture performance is often suboptimal. This study analyses the pre-analytic phase of blood culture processing through different types of risk assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed direct observations to gain in-depth knowledge of the root causes of suboptimal blood culture performance. These findings were summarised in a Bow-Tie chart. We then utilised a healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to prioritise failures per step in the process and to organise improvement activities. Finally, improvement actions were planned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Not obtaining a second set of blood cultures in the logistics of blood culture performance had the highest priority for action. Several failure modes, including human and system factors, were identified. Improvement actions included training and clinical lessons for nurses in the emergency department, updating hospital search engines to ease identification of relevant protocols, and an evaluation of the workload at the emergency department. Failure modes caused by human factors appear easy to address, however changing human behaviour is challenging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis provided useful insight into the different steps in the logistics of blood culture performance and facilitated the organisation of actions focused on addressing the most urgent root causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18918,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood cultures are essential diagnostic tools to identify pathogens in systemic infections. However, logistics of blood culture performance is often suboptimal. This study analyses the pre-analytic phase of blood culture processing through different types of risk assessments.

Methods: We performed direct observations to gain in-depth knowledge of the root causes of suboptimal blood culture performance. These findings were summarised in a Bow-Tie chart. We then utilised a healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to prioritise failures per step in the process and to organise improvement activities. Finally, improvement actions were planned.

Results: Not obtaining a second set of blood cultures in the logistics of blood culture performance had the highest priority for action. Several failure modes, including human and system factors, were identified. Improvement actions included training and clinical lessons for nurses in the emergency department, updating hospital search engines to ease identification of relevant protocols, and an evaluation of the workload at the emergency department. Failure modes caused by human factors appear easy to address, however changing human behaviour is challenging.

Conclusions: The analysis provided useful insight into the different steps in the logistics of blood culture performance and facilitated the organisation of actions focused on addressing the most urgent root causes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化血培养过程的医疗失败模式及效果分析。
背景:血液培养是识别全身性感染病原体的必要诊断工具。然而,物流的血液培养性能往往是次优的。本研究通过不同类型的风险评估来分析血培养处理的前分析阶段。方法:通过直接观察,深入了解血培养效果不佳的根本原因。这些发现总结在一个领结图表中。然后,我们利用医疗保健故障模式和效果分析来确定流程中每一步故障的优先级,并组织改进活动。最后,制定了改进措施。结果:在血培养绩效的后勤保障中,未获得第二套血培养是最优先考虑的行动。确定了几种失效模式,包括人为因素和系统因素。改进措施包括为急诊科护士提供培训和临床课程,更新医院搜索引擎以方便识别相关协议,以及评估急诊科的工作量。人为因素引起的故障模式似乎很容易解决,但改变人类行为是具有挑战性的。结论:分析提供了有用的见解在血液培养性能的物流的不同步骤,并促进行动的组织集中在解决最紧迫的根本原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Netherlands Journal of Medicine publishes papers in all relevant fields of internal medicine. In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, reviews on topics of interest or importance, case reports, book reviews and letters to the editor are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Hypotonic polyuria: at the cross-roads of copeptin. Severe acute respiratory infections surveillance for early signals in the community. Implementation of 'Choosing Wisely Netherlands' for internal medicine. Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience. A healthcare failure mode and effect analysis to optimise the process of blood culture performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1