[Survey of the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on the job training members with high exercise intensity: Analysis of the factors causing infection spread and the effectiveness of the prevention measures].

Keitaro Tsushita, Syoko Kobayashi, Saori Uno, Yuko Urano, Mayumi Ikedo
{"title":"[Survey of the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on the job training members with high exercise intensity: Analysis of the factors causing infection spread and the effectiveness of the prevention measures].","authors":"Keitaro Tsushita,&nbsp;Syoko Kobayashi,&nbsp;Saori Uno,&nbsp;Yuko Urano,&nbsp;Mayumi Ikedo","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-006-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immediately before the state of emergency was declared, there was an outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among special training participants with severe physical stress. For promoting the optimization of infection prevention measures by identifying acts and situations with high risk of infection, we conducted a survey and analysis to understand the detailed process of infection spread in these cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured interview was conducted for the special training participants on their health status, changes in symptoms, training methods, and behavior history in their private lives. Additionally, a patrol of the training facility was carried out to understand the training environment, and antibody tests were conducted on the close contacts for more accurately grasping the spread of infection, by identifying subclinical infected persons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 10 days of COVID-19 onset in the first patient, 15 of the 19 original training participants developed symptoms, and 14 patients tested positive for RT-PCR. PCR tests were also performed on four patients who did not develop the disease - two were positive and negative, each. The two negatives turned positive on a later antibody test, suggesting that there was an asymptomatic infection. In addition, all five patients who participated in the training for only a day developed symptoms and tested positive for PCR in a few days. Of the 64 people who underwent testing for antibodies as close contacts, all but one who was living together with a patient were negative on antibody testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The onset of COVID-19 occurred after the start of practice-based training continuously; therefore, the practice-based training was thought to be the main cause of the transmission. We speculate that the main factors behind the rapid spread of infection are as follows: during practice-based training, increased ventilation made it difficult to wear a mask; repeated loud vocalizations at close range; and the training pair was not fixed. Physical training without shouting and desk work, however, did not possess the risk of COVID-19, and avoiding certain situations at high risk of respiratory infections may have significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission. If personnel become infected with SARS-CoV-2, emergency measures should be devised by identifying patients and close contacts and facilitating the investigation of their behavioral history. Furthermore, evaluating and improving the effectiveness of infection control measures is necessary by ascertaining potentially infected persons by performing PCR tests, antigen tests, antibody tests, etc. in combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"64 2","pages":"107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-006-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Immediately before the state of emergency was declared, there was an outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among special training participants with severe physical stress. For promoting the optimization of infection prevention measures by identifying acts and situations with high risk of infection, we conducted a survey and analysis to understand the detailed process of infection spread in these cases.

Methods: A structured interview was conducted for the special training participants on their health status, changes in symptoms, training methods, and behavior history in their private lives. Additionally, a patrol of the training facility was carried out to understand the training environment, and antibody tests were conducted on the close contacts for more accurately grasping the spread of infection, by identifying subclinical infected persons.

Results: Within 10 days of COVID-19 onset in the first patient, 15 of the 19 original training participants developed symptoms, and 14 patients tested positive for RT-PCR. PCR tests were also performed on four patients who did not develop the disease - two were positive and negative, each. The two negatives turned positive on a later antibody test, suggesting that there was an asymptomatic infection. In addition, all five patients who participated in the training for only a day developed symptoms and tested positive for PCR in a few days. Of the 64 people who underwent testing for antibodies as close contacts, all but one who was living together with a patient were negative on antibody testing.

Conclusions: The onset of COVID-19 occurred after the start of practice-based training continuously; therefore, the practice-based training was thought to be the main cause of the transmission. We speculate that the main factors behind the rapid spread of infection are as follows: during practice-based training, increased ventilation made it difficult to wear a mask; repeated loud vocalizations at close range; and the training pair was not fixed. Physical training without shouting and desk work, however, did not possess the risk of COVID-19, and avoiding certain situations at high risk of respiratory infections may have significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission. If personnel become infected with SARS-CoV-2, emergency measures should be devised by identifying patients and close contacts and facilitating the investigation of their behavioral history. Furthermore, evaluating and improving the effectiveness of infection control measures is necessary by ascertaining potentially infected persons by performing PCR tests, antigen tests, antibody tests, etc. in combination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[SARS-CoV-2疫情对高运动强度岗位培训员的影响调查:导致感染传播的因素及预防措施效果分析]。
目的:在宣布紧急状态之前,特训学员中出现了严重身体压力的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)疫情。为了通过识别感染高危行为和情况,促进感染预防措施的优化,我们对这些病例进行了调查和分析,了解感染传播的详细过程。方法:对特训学员进行结构化访谈,了解其健康状况、症状变化、训练方法、生活行为史等。对训练场所进行巡查,了解训练环境,对密切接触者进行抗体检测,识别亚临床感染者,更准确掌握感染传播情况。结果:在第一位患者发病10天内,19名原始培训参与者中有15名出现症状,14名患者的RT-PCR检测呈阳性。还对4名没有发病的患者进行了聚合酶链反应检测,其中两名分别呈阳性和阴性。在后来的抗体测试中,这两名阴性患者转为阳性,表明有无症状感染。此外,仅参加一天培训的5名患者在几天内都出现了症状,PCR检测呈阳性。在接受抗体检测的64名密切接触者中,除了一名与患者住在一起的人外,其余人的抗体检测结果均为阴性。结论:新型冠状病毒感染发生在持续开展实训后;因此,以实践为基础的培训被认为是传播的主要原因。我们推测,感染迅速传播的主要原因是:在训练过程中,通气增加,戴口罩困难;近距离重复大声的叫声;训练搭档也不是固定的。然而,没有大喊大叫和伏兵的体育锻炼不具有新冠病毒的风险,避免某些呼吸道感染高风险的情况可能会显著降低新冠病毒的传播。如果人员感染了新冠病毒,应制定应急措施,确定患者和密切接触者,并协助调查其行为史。此外,有必要通过联合进行聚合酶链反应检测、抗原检测、抗体检测等来确定潜在感染者,从而评估和改善感染控制措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
[Selecting measurement subject workers for evaluation using a personal sampling method: a case involving analytical chemistry experiments at a university laboratory]. [The past and future of occupational health nursing research in Japan]. [Association between mental health, fear of COVID-19, and job insecurity among bus service workers during the COVID-19 pandemic]. [Convenient health initiatives to help small- and medium-sized enterprises with mental health, lifestyle-related diseases, and hazardous work]. [Development and validation of the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health leadership checklist among occupational health specialists].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1