Difficult Dialogues: Negotiating Faculty Responses to a Gender Bias Literacy Training Program.

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Qualitative Report Pub Date : 2016-07-01 Epub Date: 2016-07-11 DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2205
Carol Isaac, Linda Baier Manwell, Patricia G Devine, Cecilia Ford, Jennifer T Sheridan, Angela Byars-Winston, Evelyn Fine, Molly Carnes
{"title":"Difficult Dialogues: Negotiating Faculty Responses to a Gender Bias Literacy Training Program.","authors":"Carol Isaac, Linda Baier Manwell, Patricia G Devine, Cecilia Ford, Jennifer T Sheridan, Angela Byars-Winston, Evelyn Fine, Molly Carnes","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diversity training is challenging and can evoke strong emotional responses from participants including resistance, shame, confusion, powerlessness, defensiveness, and anger. These responses create complex situations for both presenters and other learners. We observed 3 experienced presenters as they implemented 41 gender bias literacy workshops for 376 faculty from 42 STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medicine) departments at one Midwestern university. We recorded questions and answers as well as participants' non-verbal activity during each 2.5-hour workshop. Employing content analysis and critical incident technique, we identified content that elicited heightened activity and challenging dialogues among presenters and faculty. Results from analysis of this observational data found three important findings: (1) presenters continually reinforced the idea that implicit bias is ordinary and pervasive, thus avoiding participant alienation by allowing participants to protect their self-worth and integrity; (2) difficult dialogues were managed calmly without verbal sparring or relinquishing control; (3) the presenters created an environment where individuals were more likely to accept threatening information.</p>","PeriodicalId":51387,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/23/nihms-1583476.PMC8188829.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diversity training is challenging and can evoke strong emotional responses from participants including resistance, shame, confusion, powerlessness, defensiveness, and anger. These responses create complex situations for both presenters and other learners. We observed 3 experienced presenters as they implemented 41 gender bias literacy workshops for 376 faculty from 42 STEMM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medicine) departments at one Midwestern university. We recorded questions and answers as well as participants' non-verbal activity during each 2.5-hour workshop. Employing content analysis and critical incident technique, we identified content that elicited heightened activity and challenging dialogues among presenters and faculty. Results from analysis of this observational data found three important findings: (1) presenters continually reinforced the idea that implicit bias is ordinary and pervasive, thus avoiding participant alienation by allowing participants to protect their self-worth and integrity; (2) difficult dialogues were managed calmly without verbal sparring or relinquishing control; (3) the presenters created an environment where individuals were more likely to accept threatening information.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
困难的对话:协商教师对性别偏见扫盲培训计划的回应。
多元化培训具有挑战性,可能会引起学员强烈的情绪反应,包括抵触、羞愧、困惑、无力感、防卫和愤怒。这些反应会给主讲人和其他学员造成复杂的局面。我们观察了 3 位经验丰富的主讲人在一所中西部大学为来自 42 个 STEMM(科学、技术、工程、数学、医学)系的 376 名教师举办 41 场性别偏见扫盲研讨会的过程。我们记录了每次 2.5 小时研讨会期间的问答以及参与者的非语言活动。通过内容分析和关键事件技术,我们确定了哪些内容会引起演讲者和教师之间的激烈活动和具有挑战性的对话。对这些观察数据的分析结果发现了三个重要发现:(1) 主讲人不断强化 "隐性偏见是普通且普遍存在的 "这一观点,从而通过让参与者保护自我价值和人格完整来避免参与者的疏远;(2) 在没有口角或放弃控制的情况下,平静地处理了困难的对话;(3) 主讲人创造了一种环境,让个人更有可能接受具有威胁性的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Report
Qualitative Report SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
148
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
"We Live on an Island": Perspectives on Rural Family Caregivers for Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in the United States. Managing Student Suicidality on Campus: Perspectives from Diverse Student Affairs Staff. Access to Eye Care Before and After Vision Loss: A Qualitative Study Investigating Eye Care Among Persons Who Have Become Blind. Medication Exposure Patterns in Primary Care Patients Prescribed Pharmacogenetically Actionable Opioids. Medication Exposure Patterns in Primary Care Patients Prescribed Pharmacogenetically Actionable Opioids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1