Is Telemedicine the Preferred Visit Modality in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-22 DOI:10.1055/a-1532-4610
Alena Kirzhner, Taiba Zornitzki, Viviana Ostrovsky, Hilla Knobler, Tal Schiller
{"title":"Is Telemedicine the Preferred Visit Modality in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes?","authors":"Alena Kirzhner,&nbsp;Taiba Zornitzki,&nbsp;Viviana Ostrovsky,&nbsp;Hilla Knobler,&nbsp;Tal Schiller","doi":"10.1055/a-1532-4610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic limits access to diabetes clinics. Remote communication by phone calls and WhatsApp messages became available in the past years. However, the current need to avoid face-to-face meetings necessitates further expansion of telemedicine services. There are limited data whether the option of virtual meetings is a preferred therapeutic modality for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess in a cohort of T1D patients, their preference and perception of telemedicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>T1D patients who are followed in a hospital-affiliated diabetes clinic were asked to fill a structured questionnaire aimed to determine their attitude towards telemedicine and their preference of virtual versus conventional visits. The questionnaire was offered to consecutive T1D patients who visited the clinic between August to October 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy one T1D patients that fulfilled the questionnaire were included. Median age was 38 years, 39% were male, and median duration of diabetes was 18 years. Fourteen percent of the participants preferred only virtual visits, 24% only conventional visits and 62% preferred a combination of these modalities. Sex, origin, education, duration of diabetes, mode of insulin treatment and distance from the clinic were not associated with patients' preference, but older patients (≥ 61 years) tended to prefer conventional visits. Sixty-six percent felt confident in their ability to download data from their personal medical devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients from a wide range of treatment modalities are willing to use telemedicine. However, virtual meetings cannot fully replace conventional visits in T1D especially in the older age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12241,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes","volume":"130 7","pages":"462-467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1532-4610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic limits access to diabetes clinics. Remote communication by phone calls and WhatsApp messages became available in the past years. However, the current need to avoid face-to-face meetings necessitates further expansion of telemedicine services. There are limited data whether the option of virtual meetings is a preferred therapeutic modality for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Objective: To assess in a cohort of T1D patients, their preference and perception of telemedicine.

Methods: T1D patients who are followed in a hospital-affiliated diabetes clinic were asked to fill a structured questionnaire aimed to determine their attitude towards telemedicine and their preference of virtual versus conventional visits. The questionnaire was offered to consecutive T1D patients who visited the clinic between August to October 2020.

Results: Seventy one T1D patients that fulfilled the questionnaire were included. Median age was 38 years, 39% were male, and median duration of diabetes was 18 years. Fourteen percent of the participants preferred only virtual visits, 24% only conventional visits and 62% preferred a combination of these modalities. Sex, origin, education, duration of diabetes, mode of insulin treatment and distance from the clinic were not associated with patients' preference, but older patients (≥ 61 years) tended to prefer conventional visits. Sixty-six percent felt confident in their ability to download data from their personal medical devices.

Conclusions: Patients from a wide range of treatment modalities are willing to use telemedicine. However, virtual meetings cannot fully replace conventional visits in T1D especially in the older age group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗是1型糖尿病患者首选的就诊方式吗?
背景:COVID-19大流行限制了糖尿病诊所的可及性。通过电话和WhatsApp消息进行远程通信在过去几年中成为可能。然而,由于目前需要避免面对面会议,因此必须进一步扩大远程医疗服务。虚拟会议是否是1型糖尿病(T1D)患者首选的治疗方式,数据有限。目的:了解一组T1D患者对远程医疗的偏好和认知。方法:在医院附属糖尿病诊所随访的T1D患者填写了一份结构化问卷,旨在确定他们对远程医疗的态度以及他们对虚拟与传统就诊的偏好。该问卷提供给2020年8月至10月期间就诊的连续T1D患者。结果:纳入71例完成问卷调查的T1D患者。中位年龄为38岁,39%为男性,糖尿病的中位病程为18年。14%的参与者只喜欢虚拟访问,24%的人只喜欢传统访问,62%的人喜欢这些方式的组合。性别、原籍、教育程度、糖尿病病程、胰岛素治疗方式和距离与患者的偏好无关,但年龄≥61岁的患者倾向于常规就诊。66%的人对自己从个人医疗设备中下载数据的能力充满信心。结论:各种治疗方式的患者都愿意使用远程医疗。然而,虚拟会议不能完全取代T1D的传统访问,特别是在老年群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Publishing outstanding articles from all fields of endocrinology and diabetology, from molecular biology to clinical research, this journal is a brilliant resource. Since being published in English in 1983, the popularity of this journal has grown steadily, reflecting the importance of this publication within its field. Original contributions and short communications appear in each issue along with reviews addressing current topics. In addition, supplementary issues are published each year presenting abstracts or proceedings of national and international scientific meetings. The journal was initially published in German and is still the oldest endocrinological periodical in the German-language market!
期刊最新文献
Polymorphism in the Drug Transporter Gene ABCB1 as a Potential Disease Modifier in Cortisol-Producing Adrenal Adenomas Activation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Adrenal Zona Fasciculata Cells Promotes Cortisol Secretion: Implications for the Development of Menopause-Associated Diseases Obstructive sleep apnoea and type 1 diabetes mellitus: A neglected relationship? Association Between Liver Fibrosis Score and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Hospitalized Patients Glycoprotein Non-Metastatic Protein B (GPNMB): The Missing Link Between Lysosomes and Obesity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1