Communicating radiation risks to the residents of the Chernobyl-affected areas in Russia: key lessons learned.

Annals of the ICRP Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-28 DOI:10.1177/01466453211010917
I Abalkina, E Melikhova, M Savkin
{"title":"Communicating radiation risks to the residents of the Chernobyl-affected areas in Russia: key lessons learned.","authors":"I Abalkina,&nbsp;E Melikhova,&nbsp;M Savkin","doi":"10.1177/01466453211010917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.This article analyses the communication experiences of radiation protection experts at federal/regional and local level. Efforts to justify protective measures were more successful at federal level, while the task of adjusting risk perception among local residents remains unresolved. At the recovery stage (15 years after the accident at Chernobyl nuclear power plant), the main difficulties were associated with the fact that expert knowledge was in conflict with public perception of the risk of low doses and legislative approaches. In these situations, communication success depends directly on an expert's personality. When large areas are affected, the efforts of a few dedicated experts are clearly not sufficient. More systematic approaches (training of doctors, teachers, etc.) require governmental support and experienced personnel. Federal authorities had changed their attitudes by the 15th anniversary of the accident. However, at regional level, this process stretched out for another 15 years. Public perception of large-scale health consequences still persists. Examples and survey results are presented in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":39551,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the ICRP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01466453211010917","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the ICRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466453211010917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.This article analyses the communication experiences of radiation protection experts at federal/regional and local level. Efforts to justify protective measures were more successful at federal level, while the task of adjusting risk perception among local residents remains unresolved. At the recovery stage (15 years after the accident at Chernobyl nuclear power plant), the main difficulties were associated with the fact that expert knowledge was in conflict with public perception of the risk of low doses and legislative approaches. In these situations, communication success depends directly on an expert's personality. When large areas are affected, the efforts of a few dedicated experts are clearly not sufficient. More systematic approaches (training of doctors, teachers, etc.) require governmental support and experienced personnel. Federal authorities had changed their attitudes by the 15th anniversary of the accident. However, at regional level, this process stretched out for another 15 years. Public perception of large-scale health consequences still persists. Examples and survey results are presented in this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向俄罗斯切尔诺贝利受影响地区的居民通报辐射风险:吸取的主要教训。
这篇论文不一定反映国际放射防护委员会的观点。本文分析了联邦/地区和地方两级辐射防护专家的交流经验。在联邦层面,为保护措施辩护的努力更为成功,而调整当地居民对风险认知的任务仍未解决。在恢复阶段(切尔诺贝利核电站事故发生15年后),主要困难与专家知识与公众对低剂量风险的认识和立法办法相冲突有关。在这些情况下,沟通的成功直接取决于专家的个性。当大面积受到影响时,少数专门专家的努力显然是不够的。更系统化的方法(培训医生、教师等)需要政府的支持和经验丰富的人员。在事故发生15周年之际,联邦当局改变了他们的态度。然而,在区域一级,这一进程又延长了15年。公众对大规模健康后果的看法仍然存在。文中给出了实例和调查结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the ICRP
Annals of the ICRP Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The International Commission on Radiological Protection was founded in 1928 to advance for the public benefit the science of radiological protection. The ICRP provides recommendations and guidance on protection against the risks associated with ionising radiation, from artificial sources as widely used in medicine, general industry and nuclear enterprises, and from naturally occurring sources. These reports and recommendations are published six times each year on behalf of the ICRP as the journal Annals of the ICRP. Each issue provides in-depth coverage of a specific subject area.
期刊最新文献
Optimisation of Protection in Medical Imaging: Necessary, Challenging, and Possible. Optimisation of Radiological Protection in Digital Radiology Techniques for Medical Imaging. Discussion of uncertainties and the impact of different neutron RBEs on all solid cancer radiation incidence risks obtained from the Japanese A-bomb survivor data. ICRP 2021+1: THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE SYSTEM OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION. The 2021 Bo Lindell Lecture: Inclusive, accountable, transparent: the direction we should take for the benefit of present and future generations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1