Restaurant Characteristics Associated With the Use of Specific Food-Cooling Methods.

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Health Pub Date : 2020-06-01
Kirsten Reed, Laura Brown, Danny Ripley, Nicole Hedeen, David Nicholas, Brenda Faw, Lisa Bushnell, Priya Nair, Timothy Wickam
{"title":"Restaurant Characteristics Associated With the Use of Specific Food-Cooling Methods.","authors":"Kirsten Reed, Laura Brown, Danny Ripley, Nicole Hedeen, David Nicholas, Brenda Faw, Lisa Bushnell, Priya Nair, Timothy Wickam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pathogen growth caused by improper or slow cooling of hot foods was a contributing factor in 504 of restaurant- and deli-related outbreaks in the U.S. from 1998-2008. Little is known, however, about restaurant cooling practices. To fill this gap, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) conducted an observational study to identify and understand factors that might determine which methods restaurants follow to rapidly cool food. These methods include refrigerating food at ≤41 °F, at shallow depths, and in containers that are ventilated, unstacked, and have space around them. EHS-Net personnel collected data through manager interviews and observation of cooling processes in 420 randomly selected restaurants. Regression analyses revealed characteristics of restaurants most likely to use the cooling methods assessed. These characteristics included ownership by restaurant chains, manager food safety training and certification, few foods cooled at a time, many meals served daily, and a high ratio of workers to managers. These findings suggest that regulatory food safety programs and the retail industry might improve cooling methods-and reduce outbreaks-by providing and encouraging manager food safety training and certification, and by focusing intervention efforts on independent and smaller restaurants.</p>","PeriodicalId":15713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8205421/pdf/nihms-1694970.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pathogen growth caused by improper or slow cooling of hot foods was a contributing factor in 504 of restaurant- and deli-related outbreaks in the U.S. from 1998-2008. Little is known, however, about restaurant cooling practices. To fill this gap, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) conducted an observational study to identify and understand factors that might determine which methods restaurants follow to rapidly cool food. These methods include refrigerating food at ≤41 °F, at shallow depths, and in containers that are ventilated, unstacked, and have space around them. EHS-Net personnel collected data through manager interviews and observation of cooling processes in 420 randomly selected restaurants. Regression analyses revealed characteristics of restaurants most likely to use the cooling methods assessed. These characteristics included ownership by restaurant chains, manager food safety training and certification, few foods cooled at a time, many meals served daily, and a high ratio of workers to managers. These findings suggest that regulatory food safety programs and the retail industry might improve cooling methods-and reduce outbreaks-by providing and encouraging manager food safety training and certification, and by focusing intervention efforts on independent and smaller restaurants.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与使用特定食品冷却方法有关的餐厅特征。
1998-2008 年间,在美国发生的 504 起与餐馆和熟食有关的疫情中,热食冷却不当或冷却过慢导致病原体滋生是一个诱因。然而,人们对餐馆的冷却方法知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,美国疾病控制和预防中心的环境卫生专家网络(EHS-Net)开展了一项观察研究,以确定并了解可能决定餐馆采用哪些方法快速冷却食物的因素。这些方法包括在温度≤41 °F、深度较浅、通风、无堆叠且周围有空间的容器中冷藏食物。EHS-Net 的工作人员通过采访经理和观察 420 家随机抽取的餐馆的冷却过程来收集数据。回归分析显示了最有可能使用所评估的冷却方法的餐馆的特征。这些特征包括连锁餐厅的所有权、经理的食品安全培训和认证、每次冷却的食品数量少、每天供应的饭菜多以及工人与经理的比例高。这些研究结果表明,食品安全监管项目和零售业可以通过提供和鼓励经理食品安全培训和认证,以及将干预工作重点放在独立和较小的餐馆上,来改进冷却方法,从而减少疫情爆发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health
Journal of Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Health (JEH) is published 10 times per year by the National Environmental Health Association and keeps readers up-to-date on current issues, new research, useful products and services, and employment opportunities. As the only direct link to the complete spectrum of environmental health topics, the JEH reaches more than 20,000 professionals working to solve problems in areas such as air quality, drinking water, food safety and protection, hazardous materials/toxic substances management, institutional environmental health, occupational safety and health, terrorism and all-hazards preparedness, vector control, wastewater management, and water pollution control/water quality.
期刊最新文献
Rebuilding Caribbean Environmental Health Post-Crisis Programs: A Preliminary Study for Virtual Mentorship. Development, Evaluation, and Long-Term Outcomes of Environmental Health and Land Reuse Training-Part 1: Developing Environmental Health and Land Reuse Trainings for the Environmental Health Workforce and Their Community Partners. Promoting Health Literacy With Empathetic and Inclusive Communication. Profiling Metal-Induced Genotoxic Endpoints. THE ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL EXPOSURES (ACE) PROGRAM: TOOLKIT ADVANCES AND RECENT INVESTIGATIONS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1