Journal of Environmental Health最新文献

In May 2023, the Shelby County Health Department identified a legionellosis outbreak among attendees of the same church. Epidemiologic, environmental, and laboratory investigations were initiated. Laboratory-based surveillance identified persons with a positive Legionella test result. Church attendees were surveyed about attendance, symptoms of legionellosis, and water exposures. Environmental assessment of the church included asking about recent water management practices and collecting samples from water sources for culture. The health department identified 16 church attendees who had legionellosis symptoms. Of these, 9 (56%) had positive laboratory test results for Legionella pneumophila, 7 were hospitalized, and none died. Our investigation revealed that recent changes in water management practices at the church included renewed operation of a large, jetted baptismal font. In all, 17 environmental samples were collected; of these samples, 5 (including 4 from the baptismal font) had L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolated by culture. Environmental sampling was crucial in identifying the baptismal font as the likely source of L. pneumophila. Education about water management and remediation recommendations were provided to staff at the church.

After the hurricanes in 2017 in the U.S. Caribbean, it was essential to rebuild, strengthen, and sustain essential environmental health (EH) services and systems. The National Environmental Health Association, in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, developed an online mentorship program for newly hired and existing EH staff and health department leadership in Caribbean health departments. Participants were provided with both practical and didactic learning and were allowed to evaluate the program. Both mentors and mentees were highly satisfied with the knowledge and skills acquired, and mentees expressed it was relevant to their daily work. Based on the findings, we recommend both an online and a hybrid mentorship program for leadership- and inspector-level workforces in EH and potentially in other fields.

This article is the first in a series of three that describes the development and delivery of the Environmental Health and Land Reuse (EHLR) Basic Training and the first pilot of the EHLR Immersion Training. The EHLR Basic Training is based on the 5-step Land Reuse Model from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Through a collaboration with the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA), we developed the EHLR Basic Training in two modalities: virtual/live (maintained by ATSDR) and online/asynchronous (maintained by NEHA). The modules include: 1) Engaging With Your Community, 2) Evaluating Environmental and Health Risks, 3) Communicating Environmental and Health Risks, 4) Redesigning With Health in Mind, and 5) Measuring Success: Evaluating Environmental and Health Change. From June 2019-August 2022, ATSDR and NEHA delivered 10 EHLR Classroom Basic Trainings, launched the EHLR Online Basic Training, and developed the EHLR Immersion Training. We piloted the EHLR Immersion Training in July 2022, March 2023, and July 2023. Our participants included science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students from Diné College who were in a Summer Intern Program; tribal environmental professionals; NEHA members in environmental health careers; and environmental professionals, students, and community members who were engaged in environmental work or environmental justice. We have learned that individual training modules can be used for specific learning needs among our participants. Perhaps more importantly, we have learned that undergraduate students and community members can and should be engaged in EHLR Training. The results of the evaluation and long-term follow-up of the EHLR Training will be presented in the second and third articles in this series.

The National Environmental Health Association strives to provide up-to-date and relevant information on environmental health and to build partnerships in the profession. In pursuit of these goals, we feature this column on environmental health services from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in every issue of the Journal. In these columns, authors from CDC's Water, Food, and Environmental Health Services Branch, as well as guest authors, will share tools, resources, and guidance for environmental health practitioners. The conclusions in these columns are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC. Traci Augustosky leads a team of writer-editors at the National Center for Environmental Health within CDC. Kathleen Walker is a senior content strategist who creates plain language health content that educates and inspires behavior change. Dr. Allison Chatham is a health communications specialist at the National Center for Environmental Health within CDC. Don Meadows is a technical writer-editor for the CDC Office of Communication. Yvanna Marlin-Guanga is a project manager who leads CommunicateHealth teams in creating inclusive products that educate, inform, and empower various audiences.

Many toxic metals are involved in the initiation and progression of DNA damage that can result in the activation of DNA damage response machinery at double- and single-stranded DNA; this response can result in global and gene-specific DNA alteration. The toxicological profiles from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and several other studies have demonstrated the influence of metal exposure-induced genotoxic endpoints and epigenetic modifications. Our review systematically summarizes accumulating evidence from ATSDR toxicological profiles and the available literature that demonstrate a possible induction of various genotoxic endpoints and metal exposures. We include in this article studies on chromium, arsenic, nickel, lead, mercury, and zinc.

The National Environmental Health Association strives to provide up-to-date and relevant information on environmental health and to build partnerships in the profession. In pursuit of these goals, we feature this column on environmental health services from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in every issue of the Journal. In these columns, authors from CDC's Water, Food, and Environmental Health Services Branch, as well as guest authors, will share tools, resources, and guidance for environmental health practitioners. The conclusions in these columns are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC. Dr. Tanya Telfair LeBlanc is a senior health scientist/epidemiologist. Dr. Perri Ruckart is a health scientist and team lead. Shannon Omisore serves as a health communication specialist. All work in the Lead Poisoning Prevention and Environmental Health Tracking Branch at CDC.

As part of our continued effort to highlight innovative approaches to improve the health and environment of communities, the Journal is pleased to publish regular columns from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). ATSDR serves the public by using the best science, taking responsive public health actions, and providing trusted health information to prevent harmful exposures and diseases related to toxic substances. The purpose of this column is to inform readers of ATSDR's activities and initiatives to better understand the relationship between exposure to hazardous substances in the environment, its impact on human health, and how to protect public health. This information is distributed solely for the purpose of predissemination peer review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by ATSDR. The findings in this column are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent any agency determination, policy, or official position of CDC or ATSDR. Karen Scruton is the chief of the Exposure Investigations Section in the Office of Community Health Hazard Assessment at ATSDR.