The effects of standing in tutorial group meetings on learning: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2021.100156
H.Q. Chim , Renate H.M. de Groot , Pascal W.M. Van Gerven , Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink , Roy H.J. Erkens , Ulrike von Rango , Jos L.V. Broers , Hans H.C.M. Savelberg
{"title":"The effects of standing in tutorial group meetings on learning: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"H.Q. Chim ,&nbsp;Renate H.M. de Groot ,&nbsp;Pascal W.M. Van Gerven ,&nbsp;Mirjam G.A. oude Egbrink ,&nbsp;Roy H.J. Erkens ,&nbsp;Ulrike von Rango ,&nbsp;Jos L.V. Broers ,&nbsp;Hans H.C.M. Savelberg","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Standing desks have been brought into the education environment to reduce sedentary behavior among students. The current study explored the effects of standing in tutorial group meetings on learning among undergraduate students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ninety-six participants were randomly allocated to a Sit or Stand group, with 2 h tutorial group meetings scheduled, once or twice per week, for nine weeks. Learning was analyzed using exam grades, concept maps, and tutorial interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, the Sit and Stand groups did not differ from each other in terms of learning, measured through their exam, concept map, and the use of learning-oriented interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Standing in tutorial group meetings neither enhanced nor compromised learning. Considering the health risks associated with prolonged sedentary behavior, offering standing tutorial group meetings to undergraduate students is a recommended solution to break up prolonged sedentary behavior and encourage more physical activity, while maintaining the learning performance of students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100156","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949321000089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standing desks have been brought into the education environment to reduce sedentary behavior among students. The current study explored the effects of standing in tutorial group meetings on learning among undergraduate students.

Methods

Ninety-six participants were randomly allocated to a Sit or Stand group, with 2 h tutorial group meetings scheduled, once or twice per week, for nine weeks. Learning was analyzed using exam grades, concept maps, and tutorial interactions.

Results

Overall, the Sit and Stand groups did not differ from each other in terms of learning, measured through their exam, concept map, and the use of learning-oriented interactions.

Conclusion

Standing in tutorial group meetings neither enhanced nor compromised learning. Considering the health risks associated with prolonged sedentary behavior, offering standing tutorial group meetings to undergraduate students is a recommended solution to break up prolonged sedentary behavior and encourage more physical activity, while maintaining the learning performance of students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参加辅导小组会议对学习的影响:一项随机对照试验
站立式课桌已被引入教育环境,以减少学生久坐不动的行为。本研究旨在探讨参加辅导小组会议对大学生学习的影响。方法96名受试者随机分为坐或站组,每周1 - 2次,共9周。通过考试成绩、概念图和辅导互动来分析学习情况。结果总的来说,通过考试、概念图和以学习为导向的互动的使用来衡量,坐着组和站着组在学习方面没有什么不同。结论:参加辅导小组会议既不会促进学习,也不会损害学习。考虑到长时间久坐带来的健康风险,为本科生提供站立辅导小组会议是一种建议的解决方案,可以打破长时间久坐的行为,鼓励更多的体育活动,同时保持学生的学习成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1