Early childhood educators’ use of neuroscience: Knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and professional learning

IF 3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2025.100247
Kate E. Williams , Tanya Burr , Lyra L'Estrange , Kerryann Walsh
{"title":"Early childhood educators’ use of neuroscience: Knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and professional learning","authors":"Kate E. Williams ,&nbsp;Tanya Burr ,&nbsp;Lyra L'Estrange ,&nbsp;Kerryann Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knowledge of early brain development is increasingly important in early childhood education, but no studies have focussed solely on the neuroscience knowledge and attitudes of early childhood educators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>524 Australian early childhood educators completed a survey measuring their neuroscience knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy, sources of knowledge, and perspectives on training needs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although educators held relevant understandings, there was widespread belief in ‘neuromyths’. Participants held strong positive attitudes toward neuroscience regardless of their socio-demographic background. Participants who held a Bachelor degree or higher, and those in a leadership position, had higher neuro-literacy and self-efficacy. Less than a quarter reported receiving adequate neuroscience content in their pre-service training.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While there is a policy mandate and positive attitudes toward using neuroscience in early childhood education, the sector is currently hampered by limited pre-service training content, and inadequate in-service professional learning. Further transdisciplinary work is required to address these gaps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949325000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of early brain development is increasingly important in early childhood education, but no studies have focussed solely on the neuroscience knowledge and attitudes of early childhood educators.

Methods

524 Australian early childhood educators completed a survey measuring their neuroscience knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy, sources of knowledge, and perspectives on training needs.

Results

Although educators held relevant understandings, there was widespread belief in ‘neuromyths’. Participants held strong positive attitudes toward neuroscience regardless of their socio-demographic background. Participants who held a Bachelor degree or higher, and those in a leadership position, had higher neuro-literacy and self-efficacy. Less than a quarter reported receiving adequate neuroscience content in their pre-service training.

Conclusion

While there is a policy mandate and positive attitudes toward using neuroscience in early childhood education, the sector is currently hampered by limited pre-service training content, and inadequate in-service professional learning. Further transdisciplinary work is required to address these gaps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿教育工作者对神经科学的运用:知识、态度、自我效能感与专业学习
早期大脑发育的知识在幼儿教育中越来越重要,但目前还没有研究只关注幼儿教育者的神经科学知识和态度。方法对524名澳大利亚幼儿教育工作者进行神经科学知识、态度、自我效能感、知识来源、培训需求等方面的调查。结果虽然教育工作者有相关的认识,但普遍存在“神经神话”。无论他们的社会人口背景如何,参与者都对神经科学持强烈的积极态度。拥有学士或更高学位的参与者,以及那些处于领导地位的参与者,有更高的神经素养和自我效能感。不到四分之一的人表示在他们的职前培训中接受了足够的神经科学内容。结论虽然在幼儿教育中应用神经科学有政策要求和积极的态度,但目前该部门受到有限的职前培训内容和在职专业学习不足的阻碍。需要进一步的跨学科工作来解决这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
The emerging submission crisis in behavioral science Task-dependent neural effects of physical exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies Prevalence of educational myths among Ecuadorian teachers The role of resilient coping as a mediator between trait emotional intelligence and academic motivation in university students Effects of solving contextualized physics problems among men and women: A psychophysiological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1