Safeguarding the Journalistic DNA: Attitudes towards the Role of Professional Values in Algorithmic News Recommender Designs.

Digital journalism (Abingdon, England) Pub Date : 2021-07-21 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21670811.2021.1912622
Mariella Bastian, Natali Helberger, Mykola Makhortykh
{"title":"Safeguarding the Journalistic DNA: Attitudes towards the Role of Professional Values in Algorithmic News Recommender Designs.","authors":"Mariella Bastian,&nbsp;Natali Helberger,&nbsp;Mykola Makhortykh","doi":"10.1080/21670811.2021.1912622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to the extensive debate on the influence of algorithmic news recommenders (ANRs) on individual news diets, the interaction between such systems and journalistic norms and missions remain under-studied. The change in the relationship between journalists and the audience caused by the transition to personalized news delivery has profound consequences for the understanding of what journalism should be. To investigate how media practitioners perceive the impact of ANRs on their professional norms and media organizations' missions, and how these norms and missions can be integrated into ANR design, this article looks at two quality newspapers from the Netherlands and Switzerland. Using an interview-based approach conducted with practitioners in different departments (e.g. journalists, data scientists, and product managers), it explores how ANRs interact with organization-centred and audience-centred journalistic values. The paper's findings indicate a varying degree of prominence for specific values between individual practitioners in the context of their perception of ANRs. At the same time, the paper also reveals that some organization-centred (e.g. transparency) and most audience-centred (e.g. usability) values are viewed as prerequisites for successful ANR design by practitioners with different professional backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":93281,"journal":{"name":"Digital journalism (Abingdon, England)","volume":"9 6","pages":"835-863"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21670811.2021.1912622","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital journalism (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1912622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

In contrast to the extensive debate on the influence of algorithmic news recommenders (ANRs) on individual news diets, the interaction between such systems and journalistic norms and missions remain under-studied. The change in the relationship between journalists and the audience caused by the transition to personalized news delivery has profound consequences for the understanding of what journalism should be. To investigate how media practitioners perceive the impact of ANRs on their professional norms and media organizations' missions, and how these norms and missions can be integrated into ANR design, this article looks at two quality newspapers from the Netherlands and Switzerland. Using an interview-based approach conducted with practitioners in different departments (e.g. journalists, data scientists, and product managers), it explores how ANRs interact with organization-centred and audience-centred journalistic values. The paper's findings indicate a varying degree of prominence for specific values between individual practitioners in the context of their perception of ANRs. At the same time, the paper also reveals that some organization-centred (e.g. transparency) and most audience-centred (e.g. usability) values are viewed as prerequisites for successful ANR design by practitioners with different professional backgrounds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维护新闻DNA:对算法新闻推荐设计中专业价值观作用的态度。
与关于算法新闻推荐(ANRs)对个人新闻饮食的影响的广泛辩论相反,此类系统与新闻规范和任务之间的相互作用仍未得到充分研究。向个性化新闻传递的转变所导致的记者与受众之间关系的变化,对理解新闻应该是什么产生了深远的影响。为了调查媒体从业者如何看待ANR对其专业规范和媒体组织使命的影响,以及如何将这些规范和使命融入到ANR设计中,本文以荷兰和瑞士的两家优质报纸为研究对象。通过与不同部门的从业者(如记者、数据科学家和产品经理)进行基于访谈的方法,它探讨了anr如何与以组织为中心和以受众为中心的新闻价值观相互作用。本文的研究结果表明,在个体从业者对ANRs的感知背景下,特定价值的突出程度不同。同时,本文还揭示了一些以组织为中心(例如透明度)和大多数以受众为中心(例如可用性)的价值观被不同专业背景的从业者视为成功ANR设计的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safeguarding the Journalistic DNA: Attitudes towards the Role of Professional Values in Algorithmic News Recommender Designs. How Message Features and Social Endorsements Affect the Longevity of News Sharing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1