The Effect of Intraoperative Radiographs on Component Position and Leg Length during Routine Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Hip & pelvis Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-06 DOI:10.5371/hp.2021.33.3.128
Nicholas M Brown, James F McDonald, Robert A Sershon, Robert H Hopper
{"title":"The Effect of Intraoperative Radiographs on Component Position and Leg Length during Routine Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Nicholas M Brown,&nbsp;James F McDonald,&nbsp;Robert A Sershon,&nbsp;Robert H Hopper","doi":"10.5371/hp.2021.33.3.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate component placement and restoration of patient anatomy are critical in total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. Although intraoperative radiographs are sometimes utilized, it is unclear whether this practice can improve accuracy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study evaluated acetabular cup abduction, anteversion, leg length, and offset among 100 posterior approach THAs performed without imaging (No X-ray group) and compared them to a subsequent series of 100 THAs where an intraoperative radiograph was taken with the trial components in place (X-ray group). THAs were performed using a posterior approach by a single, experienced surgeon whose goal was to place the cup at 45° of abduction and 30° of anteversion. Supine anteroposterior pelvic digital radiographs taken at the first (nominal 4-week) postoperative visit were used for measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Slight differences in cup abduction (47°±6° vs 44°±6°, respectively, <i>P</i>=0.003) and anteversion angle (35°±6° vs 31°±6°, respectively, <i>P</i><0.001) were observed between the X-ray and No X-ray groups; however, a similar proportion of cups within 10° of the target angles was observed (76% vs 83%, respectively, <i>P</i>=0.22). No difference in offset measurements (1.1±6.6 mm vs 0.3±6.9 mm, respectively, <i>P</i>=0.42) or leg lengths (0.3±3.8 mm vs 0.3±4.8 mm, respectively, <i>P</i>=0.94) was observed between the X-ray and No X-ray groups; however, the X-ray group showed less leg length variation (<i>P</i>=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the routine use of intraoperative radiographs was not associated with improved implant positioning for uncomplicated primary THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"33 3","pages":"128-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/94/hp-33-128.PMC8440128.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2021.33.3.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate component placement and restoration of patient anatomy are critical in total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. Although intraoperative radiographs are sometimes utilized, it is unclear whether this practice can improve accuracy.

Materials and methods: This study evaluated acetabular cup abduction, anteversion, leg length, and offset among 100 posterior approach THAs performed without imaging (No X-ray group) and compared them to a subsequent series of 100 THAs where an intraoperative radiograph was taken with the trial components in place (X-ray group). THAs were performed using a posterior approach by a single, experienced surgeon whose goal was to place the cup at 45° of abduction and 30° of anteversion. Supine anteroposterior pelvic digital radiographs taken at the first (nominal 4-week) postoperative visit were used for measurements.

Results: Slight differences in cup abduction (47°±6° vs 44°±6°, respectively, P=0.003) and anteversion angle (35°±6° vs 31°±6°, respectively, P<0.001) were observed between the X-ray and No X-ray groups; however, a similar proportion of cups within 10° of the target angles was observed (76% vs 83%, respectively, P=0.22). No difference in offset measurements (1.1±6.6 mm vs 0.3±6.9 mm, respectively, P=0.42) or leg lengths (0.3±3.8 mm vs 0.3±4.8 mm, respectively, P=0.94) was observed between the X-ray and No X-ray groups; however, the X-ray group showed less leg length variation (P=0.05).

Conclusion: In this study, the routine use of intraoperative radiographs was not associated with improved implant positioning for uncomplicated primary THA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中x线片对常规后路全髋关节置换术中假体位置和腿长的影响。
目的:在全髋关节置换术中,准确的假体放置和患者解剖结构的恢复是至关重要的。虽然术中有时使用x线片,但尚不清楚这种做法是否能提高准确性。材料和方法:本研究评估了100例未经影像学检查的后路tha(无x线组)的髋臼杯外展、前伸、腿长和偏移,并将其与随后的100例tha(术中x线组)进行了比较,其中术中x线片拍摄了试验部件。该手术由一位经验丰富的外科医生通过后路进行,其目标是将关节杯置于外展45°和前倾30°。使用术后第一次(名义4周)就诊时拍摄的仰卧位骨盆正位数字x线片进行测量。结果:杯外展(47°±6°vs 44°±6°,P=0.003)和前倾角(35°±6°vs 31°±6°,PP=0.22)有轻微差异。x线组和无x线组的腿距测量(分别为1.1±6.6 mm vs 0.3±6.9 mm, P=0.42)和腿长(分别为0.3±3.8 mm vs 0.3±4.8 mm, P=0.94)均无差异;x线组腿长变化较小(P=0.05)。结论:在本研究中,对于简单的原发性THA,术中常规使用x线片与改善植入物定位无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cement Filling Technique to Prevent Greater Trochanter Displacement in Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Technical Note. Change of Sacral Slope according to the Surgical Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Complications and Healthcare Cost of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Depressive Disorder. Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Single Center Experience. Evidence-based Approach for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1