Imputation Procedures for Cognitive Variables in the Mexican Health and Aging Study: Evaluating the Bias from Excluding Participants with Missing Data.

Brian Downer, Jaqueline Avila, Nai-Wei Chen, Rebeca Wong
{"title":"Imputation Procedures for Cognitive Variables in the Mexican Health and Aging Study: Evaluating the Bias from Excluding Participants with Missing Data.","authors":"Brian Downer,&nbsp;Jaqueline Avila,&nbsp;Nai-Wei Chen,&nbsp;Rebeca Wong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-response of cognitive data in cohort studies is a barrier to cognitive aging research. We describe the procedures for the imputation of non-responses for cognitive data in the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS). Data came from the 2001-2015 MHAS waves. We also describe the association of cognition with education, age, and other variables in 2015 with and without the imputed values. Between 12.3% and 37.9% of participants were missing data for at least one cognition variable. When we conducted the analysis with and without the imputed values, the relationships between education, age, and cognition were similar in direction and significance, but different in magnitude. Non-response of cognitive data is common and non-random in the MHAS. Investigators should use the data sets that include the imputed values, which are publicly available.</p>","PeriodicalId":74642,"journal":{"name":"Realidad, datos y espacio : revista internacional de estadistica y geografia","volume":"12 2","pages":"90-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553231/pdf/nihms-1746745.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Realidad, datos y espacio : revista internacional de estadistica y geografia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-response of cognitive data in cohort studies is a barrier to cognitive aging research. We describe the procedures for the imputation of non-responses for cognitive data in the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS). Data came from the 2001-2015 MHAS waves. We also describe the association of cognition with education, age, and other variables in 2015 with and without the imputed values. Between 12.3% and 37.9% of participants were missing data for at least one cognition variable. When we conducted the analysis with and without the imputed values, the relationships between education, age, and cognition were similar in direction and significance, but different in magnitude. Non-response of cognitive data is common and non-random in the MHAS. Investigators should use the data sets that include the imputed values, which are publicly available.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥健康与老龄化研究中认知变量的归因程序:评估排除数据缺失参与者的偏倚
队列研究中认知数据的不响应是认知衰老研究的一个障碍。我们描述了在墨西哥健康和老龄化研究(MHAS)的认知数据的非反应的归因程序。数据来自2001年至2015年的MHAS波。我们还描述了2015年认知与教育、年龄和其他变量的关联,有和没有输入值。12.3%至37.9%的参与者至少缺少一个认知变量的数据。当我们在有和没有输入值的情况下进行分析时,教育程度、年龄和认知之间的关系在方向和意义上是相似的,但在量级上是不同的。认知数据无反应在MHAS中是常见且非随机的。调查人员应该使用包含估算值的数据集,这些数据集是公开的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Imputation of Non-Response in Height and Weight in the Mexican Health and Aging Study. Imputation Procedures for Cognitive Variables in the Mexican Health and Aging Study: Evaluating the Bias from Excluding Participants with Missing Data. Attrition in panel surveys in Mexico: The Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS). "Vulnerability, Resiliency, and Adaptation: The Health of Latin Americans during the Migration Process to the United States"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1