Methodological Challenges for Epidemiologic Studies of Deprescribing at the End of Life.

3区 医学 Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-23 DOI:10.1007/s40471-021-00264-7
Jennifer Tjia, Jennifer L Lund, Deborah S Mack, Attah Mbrah, Yiyang Yuan, Qiaoxi Chen, Seun Osundolire, Cara L McDermott
{"title":"Methodological Challenges for Epidemiologic Studies of Deprescribing at the End of Life.","authors":"Jennifer Tjia,&nbsp;Jennifer L Lund,&nbsp;Deborah S Mack,&nbsp;Attah Mbrah,&nbsp;Yiyang Yuan,&nbsp;Qiaoxi Chen,&nbsp;Seun Osundolire,&nbsp;Cara L McDermott","doi":"10.1007/s40471-021-00264-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To describe approaches to measuring deprescribing and associated outcomes in studies of patients approaching end of life (EOL).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We reviewed studies published through 2020 that evaluated deprescribing in patients with limited life expectancy and approaching EOL. Deprescribing includes reducing the number of medications, decreasing medication dose(s), and eliminating potentially inappropriate medications. Tools such as STOPPFrail, OncPal, and the Unnecessary Drug Use Measure can facilitate deprescribing. Outcome measures vary and selection of measures should align with the operationalized deprescribing definition used by study investigators.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>EOL deprescribing considerations include medication appropriateness in the context of patient goals for care, expected benefit from medication given life expectancy, and heightened potential for medication-related harm as death nears. Additional data are needed on how EOL deprescribing impacts patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and out-of-pocket medication-related costs to patients and caregivers. Investigators should design deprescribing studies with this information in mind.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"116-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40471-021-00264-7","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-021-00264-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose of review: To describe approaches to measuring deprescribing and associated outcomes in studies of patients approaching end of life (EOL).

Recent findings: We reviewed studies published through 2020 that evaluated deprescribing in patients with limited life expectancy and approaching EOL. Deprescribing includes reducing the number of medications, decreasing medication dose(s), and eliminating potentially inappropriate medications. Tools such as STOPPFrail, OncPal, and the Unnecessary Drug Use Measure can facilitate deprescribing. Outcome measures vary and selection of measures should align with the operationalized deprescribing definition used by study investigators.

Summary: EOL deprescribing considerations include medication appropriateness in the context of patient goals for care, expected benefit from medication given life expectancy, and heightened potential for medication-related harm as death nears. Additional data are needed on how EOL deprescribing impacts patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and out-of-pocket medication-related costs to patients and caregivers. Investigators should design deprescribing studies with this information in mind.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命末期处方解除流行病学研究的方法学挑战。
综述的目的:描述在接近生命末期(EOL)的患者研究中测量处方和相关结果的方法。最近的发现:我们回顾了截至2020年发表的研究,这些研究评估了预期寿命有限和接近EOL的患者的处方。开处方包括减少药物的数量,减少药物剂量,并消除潜在的不适当的药物。stopp虚弱、OncPal和不必要药物使用措施等工具可以促进处方的减少。结果测量方法各不相同,测量方法的选择应与研究人员使用的操作性描述性定义相一致。总结:EOL处方考虑因素包括患者护理目标背景下的药物适宜性、预期寿命下的药物获益以及死亡临近时药物相关伤害的潜在增加。关于EOL描述如何影响患者的生活质量、护理人员负担以及患者和护理人员的自付药物相关费用,还需要更多的数据。研究者应该在设计描述性研究时考虑到这些信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023 The Target Cohort Approach: An Extension of the Target Trial Framework to Nested Case-Control Studies with Incidence Density Sampling The Intersection of the Microbiome and Adiposity in Cancer Risk and Outcomes: Breast, Endometrial, and Colorectal Cancers Towards a Precision Model for Environmental Public Health: Wastewater-based Epidemiology to Assess Population-level Exposures and Related Diseases Vitamin D and Toxic Metals in Pregnancy - a Biological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1