Tissue cryopreservation using the 3M™ Novec™ 7000 freezing coolant offers a comparable and safe alternative to customary coolants.

Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1080/01478885.2021.1993528
Victor Nunez, Ashley Cook, Charles Havnar, Sean Flanagan, Nianfeng Ge, Angela Martzall, Robin E Taylor, Millicent Lu, Oleg Mayba, Oded Foreman
{"title":"Tissue cryopreservation using the 3M™ Novec™ 7000 freezing coolant offers a comparable and safe alternative to customary coolants.","authors":"Victor Nunez,&nbsp;Ashley Cook,&nbsp;Charles Havnar,&nbsp;Sean Flanagan,&nbsp;Nianfeng Ge,&nbsp;Angela Martzall,&nbsp;Robin E Taylor,&nbsp;Millicent Lu,&nbsp;Oleg Mayba,&nbsp;Oded Foreman","doi":"10.1080/01478885.2021.1993528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cryopreserving tissues for histology requires the use of coolants to buffer the sample from liquid nitrogen (LN<sub>2</sub>) and to control the rate of temperature decline. Several coolants sharing similar physical characteristics are available on the market; however, commonly used coolants are variably flammable and/or toxic and pose risks to personnel and facilities. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of three commercially available coolants: hexane, 2-methylbutane (2 M), and 1-methoxyheptafluoropropane (N7000). Fresh mouse tissues were frozen by each method, for their ability to preserve microscopic architecture and to protect RNA from degradation were evaluated and compared to tissue characteristics obtained by direct immersion in LN<sub>2</sub>. Our results show that for most tissues, the N7000 freezing coolant provides equal or improved preservation of microscopic architecture. While snap-freezing tissues in LN<sub>2</sub> provides superior RNA protection, no significant differences in RNA quality were seen between tissues frozen in hexane, 2 M, and N7000.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2021.1993528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cryopreserving tissues for histology requires the use of coolants to buffer the sample from liquid nitrogen (LN2) and to control the rate of temperature decline. Several coolants sharing similar physical characteristics are available on the market; however, commonly used coolants are variably flammable and/or toxic and pose risks to personnel and facilities. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of three commercially available coolants: hexane, 2-methylbutane (2 M), and 1-methoxyheptafluoropropane (N7000). Fresh mouse tissues were frozen by each method, for their ability to preserve microscopic architecture and to protect RNA from degradation were evaluated and compared to tissue characteristics obtained by direct immersion in LN2. Our results show that for most tissues, the N7000 freezing coolant provides equal or improved preservation of microscopic architecture. While snap-freezing tissues in LN2 provides superior RNA protection, no significant differences in RNA quality were seen between tissues frozen in hexane, 2 M, and N7000.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
使用3M™Novec™7000冷冻冷却剂进行组织冷冻保存,提供了一种与传统冷却剂相当且安全的替代品。
冷冻保存组织学组织需要使用冷却剂来缓冲液氮(LN2)的样品,并控制温度下降的速度。市场上有几种具有相似物理特性的冷却剂;然而,常用的冷却剂是易燃和/或有毒的,对人员和设施构成风险。本研究的目的是比较三种市售冷却剂的性能:己烷、2-甲基丁烷(2m)和1-甲氧基七氟丙烷(N7000)。通过每种方法冷冻新鲜小鼠组织,评估其保存微观结构和保护RNA免受降解的能力,并将其与直接浸泡在LN2中获得的组织特性进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,对于大多数组织,N7000冷冻冷却剂可以提供相同或更好的微观结构保存。虽然在LN2中快速冷冻的组织提供了更好的RNA保护,但在己烷、2m和N7000中冷冻的组织中,RNA质量没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1