High-intensity interval training and pulmonary hemodynamics in COPD with hypoxemia.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2021.1984642
Lars Aakerøy, Ester Alfer Nørstebø, Karen Marie Thomas, Espen Holte, Knut Hegbom, Eivind Brønstad, Sigurd Steinshamn
{"title":"High-intensity interval training and pulmonary hemodynamics in COPD with hypoxemia.","authors":"Lars Aakerøy,&nbsp;Ester Alfer Nørstebø,&nbsp;Karen Marie Thomas,&nbsp;Espen Holte,&nbsp;Knut Hegbom,&nbsp;Eivind Brønstad,&nbsp;Sigurd Steinshamn","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2021.1984642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is recommended for all patients with COPD. Evidence for its benefit is considerably weaker in the more severe stages of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-intensity interval training could improve exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with severe COPD and hypoxemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stable patients with COPD GOLD stage III or IV and hypoxemia were included. They underwent extensive cardiopulmonary testing including right heart catheterization, lung function tests, echocardiography and 6-minute walk test before and after completion of 10 weeks of high-intensity interval training performed with supplemental oxygen. Primary endpoint was change in pulmonary artery pressure measured by right heart catheterization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients with very severe airflow obstruction, mean FEV1 28.7% predicted and mean FEV1/VC 0.39 completed the exercise programme. Pulmonary artery pressure remained unchanged following the intervention (26,3 mmHg vs. 25,8 mmHg at baseline, p 0.673). Six-minute walk distance improved by a mean of44.8 m (p 0.010), which is also clinically significant. We found marginally improved left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography (54.6% vs 59.5%, p 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-intensity interval training significantly improved exercise capacity while pulmonary hemodynamics remained unchanged. The improvement may therefore be due to mechanisms other than altered pulmonary artery pressure. The increase in ejection fraction is of uncertain clinical significance. The low number of patients precludes firm conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"1984642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/4d/ZECR_8_1984642.PMC8603835.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2021.1984642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Exercise is recommended for all patients with COPD. Evidence for its benefit is considerably weaker in the more severe stages of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-intensity interval training could improve exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with severe COPD and hypoxemia.

Methods: Stable patients with COPD GOLD stage III or IV and hypoxemia were included. They underwent extensive cardiopulmonary testing including right heart catheterization, lung function tests, echocardiography and 6-minute walk test before and after completion of 10 weeks of high-intensity interval training performed with supplemental oxygen. Primary endpoint was change in pulmonary artery pressure measured by right heart catheterization.

Results: Ten patients with very severe airflow obstruction, mean FEV1 28.7% predicted and mean FEV1/VC 0.39 completed the exercise programme. Pulmonary artery pressure remained unchanged following the intervention (26,3 mmHg vs. 25,8 mmHg at baseline, p 0.673). Six-minute walk distance improved by a mean of44.8 m (p 0.010), which is also clinically significant. We found marginally improved left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography (54.6% vs 59.5%, p 0.046).

Conclusion: High-intensity interval training significantly improved exercise capacity while pulmonary hemodynamics remained unchanged. The improvement may therefore be due to mechanisms other than altered pulmonary artery pressure. The increase in ejection fraction is of uncertain clinical significance. The low number of patients precludes firm conclusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低氧血症COPD患者的高强度间歇训练与肺血流动力学。
背景:建议所有COPD患者进行运动。在疾病的较严重阶段,其益处的证据要弱得多。本研究的目的是探讨高强度间歇训练是否可以改善严重COPD伴低氧血症患者的运动能力、肺血流动力学和心功能。方法:纳入稳定的COPD GOLD期III或IV期低氧血症患者。他们接受了广泛的心肺测试,包括右心导管检查、肺功能检查、超声心动图检查和6分钟步行测试,在完成10周的高强度间歇训练和补充氧气前后。主要终点是通过右心导管测量肺动脉压的变化。结果:10例非常严重的气流阻塞患者完成了运动方案,平均FEV1预测28.7%,平均FEV1/VC 0.39。干预后肺动脉压保持不变(基线时26.3 mmHg vs. 25.8 mmHg, p 0.673)。6分钟步行距离平均提高44.8 m (p 0.010),同样具有临床意义。超声心动图显示左心室射血分数略有改善(54.6% vs 59.5%, p 0.046)。结论:高强度间歇训练可显著提高运动能力,但肺血流动力学不变。因此,这种改善可能是由于肺动脉压改变以外的机制。射血分数升高的临床意义不确定。由于患者数量少,因此无法得出确切的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self evaluation of breathing questionnaire (SEBQ) into Danish. Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study. Socioeconomic status and emergency department visits in adults with a history of severe childhood asthma: a register-based study. Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1