Chinese Medicine for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE American Journal of Chinese Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1142/S0192415X2250001X
Jianbo Guo, Zongshi Qin, Ngai Chung Lau, Tung Leong Fong, Wei Meng, Zhang-Jin Zhang, Yi Luo, Vivian Chi-Woon Taam Wong, Yibin Feng, Haiyong Chen
{"title":"Chinese Medicine for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jianbo Guo,&nbsp;Zongshi Qin,&nbsp;Ngai Chung Lau,&nbsp;Tung Leong Fong,&nbsp;Wei Meng,&nbsp;Zhang-Jin Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Luo,&nbsp;Vivian Chi-Woon Taam Wong,&nbsp;Yibin Feng,&nbsp;Haiyong Chen","doi":"10.1142/S0192415X2250001X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused enormous public health and socioeconomic burden globally. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine (CM) against COVID-19. Eleven databases were searched on April 30, 2021, and 52 studies were included. The RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and GRADE tools were employed to assess the risks and evidence grades. The findings with moderate certainty in GRADE showed that compared with routine treatment (RT), Lianhua Qingwen granules (LHQW) adjunctive to RT showed significantly improved efficacy rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.09, 1.31]), febrile score (standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.21, 95% CI: [-1.43, -0.99]), and computerized tomography (CT) lung images (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: [1.10, 1.38]); Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPD) plus RT significantly shortened the length of hospital stay (SMD = -1.83, 95% CI: [-2.18, -1.48]); Feiyan Yihao formula (FYYH) plus RT significantly improved the clinical efficacy rate (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: [1, 1.15]), febrile time (SMD = -0.02, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.19]), and time to negative PCR test for COVID-19 (SMD = -0.72, 95% CI: [-0.94, -0.51]). Adjunctive effects of CM with lower certainty of evidence were found, including the improvements of symptoms, laboratory findings, and mortality. No or mild adverse events were observed in most of the studies. In conclusion, the current evidence indicates that CM formulae, particularly LHQW, QFPD, and FYYH, have adjunctive effects on the standard treatment of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":50814,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Chinese Medicine","volume":"50 1","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X2250001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused enormous public health and socioeconomic burden globally. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine (CM) against COVID-19. Eleven databases were searched on April 30, 2021, and 52 studies were included. The RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and GRADE tools were employed to assess the risks and evidence grades. The findings with moderate certainty in GRADE showed that compared with routine treatment (RT), Lianhua Qingwen granules (LHQW) adjunctive to RT showed significantly improved efficacy rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.09, 1.31]), febrile score (standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.21, 95% CI: [-1.43, -0.99]), and computerized tomography (CT) lung images (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: [1.10, 1.38]); Qingfei Paidu decoction (QFPD) plus RT significantly shortened the length of hospital stay (SMD = -1.83, 95% CI: [-2.18, -1.48]); Feiyan Yihao formula (FYYH) plus RT significantly improved the clinical efficacy rate (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: [1, 1.15]), febrile time (SMD = -0.02, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.19]), and time to negative PCR test for COVID-19 (SMD = -0.72, 95% CI: [-0.94, -0.51]). Adjunctive effects of CM with lower certainty of evidence were found, including the improvements of symptoms, laboratory findings, and mortality. No or mild adverse events were observed in most of the studies. In conclusion, the current evidence indicates that CM formulae, particularly LHQW, QFPD, and FYYH, have adjunctive effects on the standard treatment of COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的中药:分级评价的系统评价和荟萃分析
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在全球造成了巨大的公共卫生和社会经济负担。本研究旨在评价中药治疗新冠肺炎的疗效和安全性。于2021年4月30日检索了11个数据库,纳入了52项研究。采用RoB 2.0、ROBINS-I和GRADE工具评估风险和证据等级。GRADE中度确定的结果显示,与常规治疗(RT)相比,联花清温颗粒(LHQW)辅助RT治疗的有效率(相对危险度(RR) = 1.19, 95%可信区间(CI):[1.09, 1.31])、发热评分(标准平均差(SMD) = -1.21, 95% CI:[-1.43, -0.99])和计算机断层扫描(CT)肺部图像(RR = 1.23, 95% CI:[1.10, 1.38])显著提高;清肺排都汤(QFPD)加RT治疗可显著缩短住院时间(SMD = -1.83, 95% CI: [-2.18, -1.48]);飞炎益好方(FYYH)联合RT治疗可显著提高临床有效率(RR = 1.07, 95% CI:[1,1.15])、发热时间(SMD = -0.02, 95% CI:[-0.23, 0.19])和COVID-19 PCR阴性检测时间(SMD = -0.72, 95% CI:[-0.94, -0.51])。我们发现了证据确定性较低的CM的辅助作用,包括症状、实验室结果和死亡率的改善。在大多数研究中未观察到不良事件或轻度不良事件。总之,目前的证据表明,中药方剂,特别是LHQW、QFPD和FYYH,对COVID-19的标准治疗具有辅助作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Chinese Medicine
American Journal of Chinese Medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, which is defined in its broadest sense possible, publishes original articles and essays relating to traditional or ethnomedicine of all cultures. Areas of particular interest include: Basic scientific and clinical research in indigenous medical techniques, therapeutic procedures, medicinal plants, and traditional medical theories and concepts; Multidisciplinary study of medical practice and health care, especially from historical, cultural, public health, and socioeconomic perspectives; International policy implications of comparative studies of medicine in all cultures, including such issues as health in developing countries, affordability and transferability of health-care techniques and concepts; Translating scholarly ancient texts or modern publications on ethnomedicine. The American Journal of Chinese Medicine will consider for publication a broad range of scholarly contributions, including original scientific research papers, review articles, editorial comments, social policy statements, brief news items, bibliographies, research guides, letters to the editors, book reviews, and selected reprints.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture and Acupoints for Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Standardized Extract of Centella asiatica Prevents Fear Memory Deficit in 3xTg-AD Mice. Biometrics Data Visualization of Ginsenosides in Anticancer Investigations. 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol from Panax ginseng Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy in Gastric Cancer Cells by Inhibiting Src. Acupuncture for Fibromyalgia: A Review Based on Multidimensional Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1