Acupuncture and Acupoints for Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE American Journal of Chinese Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1142/S0192415X23500131
Geesung Kim, Dongwon Kim, Heeyoung Moon, Da-Eun Yoon, Seoyoung Lee, Seok-Jae Ko, Bonglee Kim, Younbyoung Chae, In-Seon Lee
{"title":"Acupuncture and Acupoints for Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Geesung Kim,&nbsp;Dongwon Kim,&nbsp;Heeyoung Moon,&nbsp;Da-Eun Yoon,&nbsp;Seoyoung Lee,&nbsp;Seok-Jae Ko,&nbsp;Bonglee Kim,&nbsp;Younbyoung Chae,&nbsp;In-Seon Lee","doi":"10.1142/S0192415X23500131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acupuncture has been used as a therapeutic intervention for the treatment of numerous diseases and symptoms for thousands of years, and low back pain has been studied and treated the most in acupuncture clinics. Traditional theory strongly suggests that the selection of acupoints will influence their clinical effects and combinations (e.g., the clinical effects of a particular acupoint or combination on reducing pain), but this idea was not considered in earlier systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network analysis to evaluate the magnitude of the effects of acupoints used to treat low back pain in randomized controlled clinical trials. We found that acupuncture significantly reduced pain in patients with low back pain compared with the control group. The most frequently prescribed acupoints were BL23, GV3, BL20, BL40, and BL25, whereas the acupoints with the highest average effect size scores were BL20, GV3, GB30, GB34, and BL25. Further, the combinations of BL23-BL40, BL23-B25, and BL23-BL60 were the most frequently prescribed, while BL23-GV3, BL40-GV4, and BL23-BL25 showed the largest average effect size. By calculating clinical outcomes based on average effect sizes, we found that the most popular acupoints might not always be associated with the best results. Although a more thorough investigation is necessary to determine the clinical effects of each acupoint and combination on patients, we suggest that our approach may offer a fresh perspective that will be useful for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50814,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Chinese Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X23500131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Acupuncture has been used as a therapeutic intervention for the treatment of numerous diseases and symptoms for thousands of years, and low back pain has been studied and treated the most in acupuncture clinics. Traditional theory strongly suggests that the selection of acupoints will influence their clinical effects and combinations (e.g., the clinical effects of a particular acupoint or combination on reducing pain), but this idea was not considered in earlier systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network analysis to evaluate the magnitude of the effects of acupoints used to treat low back pain in randomized controlled clinical trials. We found that acupuncture significantly reduced pain in patients with low back pain compared with the control group. The most frequently prescribed acupoints were BL23, GV3, BL20, BL40, and BL25, whereas the acupoints with the highest average effect size scores were BL20, GV3, GB30, GB34, and BL25. Further, the combinations of BL23-BL40, BL23-B25, and BL23-BL60 were the most frequently prescribed, while BL23-GV3, BL40-GV4, and BL23-BL25 showed the largest average effect size. By calculating clinical outcomes based on average effect sizes, we found that the most popular acupoints might not always be associated with the best results. Although a more thorough investigation is necessary to determine the clinical effects of each acupoint and combination on patients, we suggest that our approach may offer a fresh perspective that will be useful for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸和穴位治疗腰痛:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
几千年来,针灸作为治疗多种疾病和症状的一种治疗干预手段,腰痛是针灸诊所研究和治疗最多的。传统理论强烈认为穴位的选择会影响它们的临床效果和组合(例如,特定穴位或组合对减轻疼痛的临床效果),但这一观点在早期的系统综述和荟萃分析中没有被考虑。我们进行了系统回顾、荟萃分析和网络分析,以评估在随机对照临床试验中用于治疗腰痛的穴位的影响程度。我们发现,与对照组相比,针灸显著减轻了腰痛患者的疼痛。处方频次最高的穴位为BL23、GV3、BL20、BL40、BL25,平均效应大小得分最高的穴位为BL20、GV3、GB30、GB34、BL25。其中,BL23-BL40、BL23-B25和BL23-BL60的使用频率最高,而BL23-GV3、BL40-GV4和BL23-BL25的平均效应量最大。通过计算基于平均效应大小的临床结果,我们发现最受欢迎的穴位可能并不总是与最好的结果相关。虽然需要更彻底的研究来确定每个穴位和组合对患者的临床效果,但我们认为我们的方法可能为未来的研究提供一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Chinese Medicine
American Journal of Chinese Medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, which is defined in its broadest sense possible, publishes original articles and essays relating to traditional or ethnomedicine of all cultures. Areas of particular interest include: Basic scientific and clinical research in indigenous medical techniques, therapeutic procedures, medicinal plants, and traditional medical theories and concepts; Multidisciplinary study of medical practice and health care, especially from historical, cultural, public health, and socioeconomic perspectives; International policy implications of comparative studies of medicine in all cultures, including such issues as health in developing countries, affordability and transferability of health-care techniques and concepts; Translating scholarly ancient texts or modern publications on ethnomedicine. The American Journal of Chinese Medicine will consider for publication a broad range of scholarly contributions, including original scientific research papers, review articles, editorial comments, social policy statements, brief news items, bibliographies, research guides, letters to the editors, book reviews, and selected reprints.
期刊最新文献
Acupuncture and Acupoints for Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Standardized Extract of Centella asiatica Prevents Fear Memory Deficit in 3xTg-AD Mice. Biometrics Data Visualization of Ginsenosides in Anticancer Investigations. 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol from Panax ginseng Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy in Gastric Cancer Cells by Inhibiting Src. Acupuncture for Fibromyalgia: A Review Based on Multidimensional Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1