Assessing the Validity of the Criteria for the Extreme Risk Category of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-18 DOI:10.12997/jla.2022.11.1.73
Kyung-Soo Kim, Sangmo Hong, Kyungdo Han, Cheol-Young Park
{"title":"Assessing the Validity of the Criteria for the Extreme Risk Category of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.","authors":"Kyung-Soo Kim,&nbsp;Sangmo Hong,&nbsp;Kyungdo Han,&nbsp;Cheol-Young Park","doi":"10.12997/jla.2022.11.1.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the criteria for the extreme risk category for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study of 35,464 individuals with established ASCVD was performed using the National Health Information Database. Incident myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and death in patients with established ASCVD was investigated to validate the criteria for the extreme risk category of ASCVD defined as the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and history of premature ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 35,464 patients, 77.97% of them were classified into the extreme risk group of ASCVD. A total of 28.10%, 39.61%, and 32.12% had DM, CKD, and a history of premature ASCVD, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 8.39 years, MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were found in 3.87%, 8.51%, and 23.98% of participants, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients with DM had higher risk for MI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-1.81), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.50), and all-cause death (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.45-1.59) than those without DM. Patients with CKD had 1.56 times higher risk for MI, 1.12 times higher risk for ischemic stroke, and 1.34 times higher risk for death than those without CKD. However, the risk for MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause death was not different between patients with and without a history of premature ASCVD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DM and CKD, but not a history of premature ASCVD, could be considered as reasonable criteria of an extreme risk for ASCVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","volume":"11 1","pages":"73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/cb/jla-11-73.PMC8792820.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.1.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: To validate the criteria for the extreme risk category for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods: An observational cohort study of 35,464 individuals with established ASCVD was performed using the National Health Information Database. Incident myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and death in patients with established ASCVD was investigated to validate the criteria for the extreme risk category of ASCVD defined as the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and history of premature ASCVD.

Results: Among 35,464 patients, 77.97% of them were classified into the extreme risk group of ASCVD. A total of 28.10%, 39.61%, and 32.12% had DM, CKD, and a history of premature ASCVD, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 8.39 years, MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were found in 3.87%, 8.51%, and 23.98% of participants, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients with DM had higher risk for MI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-1.81), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.50), and all-cause death (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.45-1.59) than those without DM. Patients with CKD had 1.56 times higher risk for MI, 1.12 times higher risk for ischemic stroke, and 1.34 times higher risk for death than those without CKD. However, the risk for MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause death was not different between patients with and without a history of premature ASCVD.

Conclusion: DM and CKD, but not a history of premature ASCVD, could be considered as reasonable criteria of an extreme risk for ASCVD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病极端危险类别标准的有效性:一项基于全国人群的研究
目的:验证动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)极端危险类别的标准。方法:使用国家健康信息数据库对35,464例ASCVD患者进行观察性队列研究。研究了ASCVD患者的心肌梗死(MI)、缺血性卒中和死亡,以验证ASCVD极端危险类别的标准,该标准定义为存在糖尿病(DM)、慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和早发ASCVD史。结果:35,464例患者中,77.97%的患者属于ASCVD极端危险组。分别有28.10%、39.61%和32.12%的患者有糖尿病、慢性肾病和早发ASCVD史。在平均8.39年的随访期间,心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和全因死亡的发生率分别为3.87%、8.51%和23.98%。在多因素分析中,糖尿病患者发生心肌梗死的风险更高(危险比[HR], 1.62;95%可信区间[CI], 1.45-1.81),缺血性卒中(HR, 1.39;95% CI, 1.29-1.50)和全因死亡(HR, 1.52;95% CI, 1.45-1.59),与无糖尿病患者相比,CKD患者心肌梗死风险高1.56倍,缺血性卒中风险高1.12倍,死亡风险高1.34倍。然而,心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和全因死亡的风险在有和没有早发ASCVD史的患者之间没有差异。结论:糖尿病和CKD,而非早发ASCVD史,可被视为ASCVD极端危险的合理标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Multiple Equations for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Calculation Against the Direct Homogeneous Method. Emerging Circulating Biomarkers for Enhanced Cardiovascular Risk Prediction. Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Mendelian Randomization Studies in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases. Nrf2 Connects Cellular Autophagy and Vascular Senescence in Atherosclerosis: A Mini-Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1