Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to influence decision criterion in a target detection paradigm.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1037/xan0000329
Ciro Civile, Rossy McLaren, Anna Cooke, I P L McLaren
{"title":"Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to influence decision criterion in a target detection paradigm.","authors":"Ciro Civile,&nbsp;Rossy McLaren,&nbsp;Anna Cooke,&nbsp;I P L McLaren","doi":"10.1037/xan0000329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article we investigate how a psychological theory used to model perceptual learning and face recognition can be used to predict that anodal tDCS delivered over the DLPFC at Fp3 site (for 10 mins duration at 1.5 mA intensity) modulates the decision criterion, <i>C</i>, (and not <i>d</i>-prime [<i>d</i>']) in a target detection task. In two between-subjects and double-blind experiments (<i>n</i> = 112) we examined the tDCS effects on C when subjects were engaged in a target detection task, in the first instance involving artificial checkerboard stimuli (Experiment 1a), and subsequently face stimuli (Experiment 1b). The results from both experiments revealed that in the sham/control groups a significantly higher <i>C</i> was used when detecting a target pattern (Experiment 1a) or face (Experiment 1b) presented on a familiar rather than a random background. Importantly, anodal tDCS significantly reduced/reversed this difference between <i>C</i> adopted for familiar and random backgrounds in both Experiment 1a and 1b without affecting <i>d</i>'. These results contribute to advance our understanding of the tDCS-induced effects on stimulus representation and to the literature regarding the modulation of <i>C</i>. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this article we investigate how a psychological theory used to model perceptual learning and face recognition can be used to predict that anodal tDCS delivered over the DLPFC at Fp3 site (for 10 mins duration at 1.5 mA intensity) modulates the decision criterion, C, (and not d-prime [d']) in a target detection task. In two between-subjects and double-blind experiments (n = 112) we examined the tDCS effects on C when subjects were engaged in a target detection task, in the first instance involving artificial checkerboard stimuli (Experiment 1a), and subsequently face stimuli (Experiment 1b). The results from both experiments revealed that in the sham/control groups a significantly higher C was used when detecting a target pattern (Experiment 1a) or face (Experiment 1b) presented on a familiar rather than a random background. Importantly, anodal tDCS significantly reduced/reversed this difference between C adopted for familiar and random backgrounds in both Experiment 1a and 1b without affecting d'. These results contribute to advance our understanding of the tDCS-induced effects on stimulus representation and to the literature regarding the modulation of C. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)影响目标检测范式中的决策准则。
在本文中,我们研究了用于模拟感知学习和人脸识别的心理学理论如何用于预测在Fp3位点(在1.5 mA强度下持续10分钟)通过DLPFC传递的节点tDCS调节目标检测任务中的决策标准C(而不是d'])。在两个受试者间实验和双盲实验(n = 112)中,我们研究了受试者在进行目标检测任务时tDCS对C的影响,第一个实验涉及人工棋盘刺激(实验1a),随后是面部刺激(实验1b)。两个实验的结果都表明,在假组/对照组中,当检测在熟悉背景而不是随机背景上呈现的目标图案(实验1a)或人脸(实验1b)时,使用的C值明显更高。重要的是,在实验1a和1b中,在不影响d'的情况下,阳极tDCS显著减少/逆转了在熟悉背景和随机背景下采用的C之间的差异。这些结果有助于我们进一步了解tdcs诱导的刺激表征效应,以及有关c .调制的文献(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.
期刊最新文献
Impact of equivalence class training on same/different learning by pigeons. Test performance in optional shift and configural acquired equivalence are positively correlated. Contextual modulation of human associative learning following novelty-facilitated extinction, counterconditioning, and conventional extinction. Both probability and rate of reinforcement can affect the acquisition and maintenance of conditioned responses. Dual-system free-operant avoidance: Extension of a theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1