Feasability of An Eccentric Isokinetic Protocol to Induce Trunk Muscle Damage: A Pilot Study.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2022-03-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1757-6724
Tilman Engel, Anne Schraplau, Monique Wochatz, Stephan Kopinski, Dominik Sonnenburg, Anne Schomoeller, Lucie Risch, Hannes Kaplick, Frank Mayer
{"title":"Feasability of An Eccentric Isokinetic Protocol to Induce Trunk Muscle Damage: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Tilman Engel,&nbsp;Anne Schraplau,&nbsp;Monique Wochatz,&nbsp;Stephan Kopinski,&nbsp;Dominik Sonnenburg,&nbsp;Anne Schomoeller,&nbsp;Lucie Risch,&nbsp;Hannes Kaplick,&nbsp;Frank Mayer","doi":"10.1055/a-1757-6724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eccentric exercise is discussed as a treatment option for clinical populations, but specific responses in terms of muscle damage and systemic inflammation after repeated loading of large muscle groups have not been conclusively characterized. Therefore, this study tested the feasibility of an isokinetic protocol for repeated maximum eccentric loading of the trunk muscles. Nine asymptomatic participants (5 f/4 m; 34±6 yrs; 175±13 cm; 76±17 kg) performed three isokinetic 2-minute all-out trunk strength tests (1x concentric (CON), 2x eccentric (ECC1, ECC2), 2 weeks apart; flexion/extension, 60°/s, ROM 55°). Outcomes were peak torque, torque decline, total work, and indicators of muscle damage and inflammation (over 168 h). Statistics were done using the Friedman test (Dunn's post-test). For ECC1 and ECC2, peak torque and total work were increased and torque decline reduced compared to CON. Repeated ECC bouts yielded unaltered torque and work outcomes. Muscle damage markers were highest after ECC1 (soreness 48 h, creatine kinase 72 h; p<0.05). Their overall responses (area under the curve) were abolished post-ECC2 compared to post-ECC1 (p<0.05). Interleukin-6 was higher post-ECC1 than CON, and attenuated post-ECC2 (p>0.05). Interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α were not detectable. All markers showed high inter-individual variability. The protocol was feasible to induce muscle damage indicators after exercising a large muscle group, but the pilot results indicated only weak systemic inflammatory responses in asymptomatic adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":" ","pages":"E9-E17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/cc/10-1055-a-1757-6724.PMC8934203.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1757-6724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eccentric exercise is discussed as a treatment option for clinical populations, but specific responses in terms of muscle damage and systemic inflammation after repeated loading of large muscle groups have not been conclusively characterized. Therefore, this study tested the feasibility of an isokinetic protocol for repeated maximum eccentric loading of the trunk muscles. Nine asymptomatic participants (5 f/4 m; 34±6 yrs; 175±13 cm; 76±17 kg) performed three isokinetic 2-minute all-out trunk strength tests (1x concentric (CON), 2x eccentric (ECC1, ECC2), 2 weeks apart; flexion/extension, 60°/s, ROM 55°). Outcomes were peak torque, torque decline, total work, and indicators of muscle damage and inflammation (over 168 h). Statistics were done using the Friedman test (Dunn's post-test). For ECC1 and ECC2, peak torque and total work were increased and torque decline reduced compared to CON. Repeated ECC bouts yielded unaltered torque and work outcomes. Muscle damage markers were highest after ECC1 (soreness 48 h, creatine kinase 72 h; p<0.05). Their overall responses (area under the curve) were abolished post-ECC2 compared to post-ECC1 (p<0.05). Interleukin-6 was higher post-ECC1 than CON, and attenuated post-ECC2 (p>0.05). Interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α were not detectable. All markers showed high inter-individual variability. The protocol was feasible to induce muscle damage indicators after exercising a large muscle group, but the pilot results indicated only weak systemic inflammatory responses in asymptomatic adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诱导躯干肌肉损伤的偏心等速运动方案的可行性:一项初步研究。
偏心运动作为临床人群的一种治疗选择进行了讨论,但在大肌群反复负荷后肌肉损伤和全身性炎症方面的具体反应尚未得到明确的表征。因此,本研究测试了躯干肌肉重复最大偏心负荷等速运动方案的可行性。9名无症状参与者(5 f/4 m;34±6岁;175±13厘米;76±17 kg)进行3次等速2分钟全身躯干强度测试(1次同心(CON), 2次偏心(ECC1, ECC2),间隔2周;屈伸,60°/s, ROM 55°)。结果是峰值扭矩、扭矩下降、总功以及肌肉损伤和炎症指标(超过168 h)。统计数据采用弗里德曼测试(Dunn's post-test)。对于ECC1和ECC2,与con相比,峰值扭矩和总功增加,扭矩下降减少。重复的ECC回合产生不变的扭矩和工作结果。ECC1后肌肉损伤指标最高(酸痛48 h,肌酸激酶72 h;p0.05)。白细胞介素-10和肿瘤坏死因子-α未检出。所有标记均表现出较高的个体间变异性。该方案在锻炼大量肌肉群后诱导肌肉损伤指标是可行的,但试点结果表明,在无症状的成年人中,只有较弱的全身炎症反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance. Effect of Lower Limb Muscle Fatigue on Dynamic Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: Role of Arm Movement. Effects of Exercise-Induced Changes in Myokine Expression on the Tumor Microenvironment. One year of heavy resistance training modifies muscle fiber characteristics in elderly Comparison of Neuromuscular Fatigue in Powerlifting Paralympics in Different Training Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1