Effect of image-guided systems in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yang Su, Min Fu, Yifan Chen, Rui Qiao, Guo-Guo Yi
{"title":"Effect of image-guided systems in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yang Su,&nbsp;Min Fu,&nbsp;Yifan Chen,&nbsp;Rui Qiao,&nbsp;Guo-Guo Yi","doi":"10.1080/24699322.2022.2047787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of image-guided systems in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Pubmed, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (inception to January 20, 2021). Two researchers extracted data and assessed paper quality independently. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) before and after surgery, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery, preoperative cylinder, postoperative residual refractive cylinder, postoperative corneal cylinder, IOL misalignment, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 14 studies with 885 cataract eyes. All data were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) (https://revman.cochrane.org/). Cases of all preoperative outcomes showed no significant difference between image-guided group and manual group. There was no significant difference in postoperative UDVA (Standard mean difference (SMD: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.11, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 59%, <i>p</i> = 0.33)), BCVA (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.18, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 36%, <i>p</i> = 0.72), corneal cylinder (Weighted mean difference WMD: 0.13, 95% CI: -0.06 to -0.32, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.17), IOP (WMD: -0.37, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.62, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 9%, <i>p</i> = 0.46) between two groups. There was less residual refractive cylinder in image-guided group than in manual group (WMD: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.14, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 59%, <i>p</i><0.00001). It is more accurate in IOL alignment when combined with image-guided systems (WMD: -1.20, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.96, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 14%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Image-guided systems can improve the effect in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520597,"journal":{"name":"Computer assisted surgery (Abingdon, England)","volume":" ","pages":"4-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer assisted surgery (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2022.2047787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the effect of image-guided systems in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (inception to January 20, 2021). Two researchers extracted data and assessed paper quality independently. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) before and after surgery, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery, preoperative cylinder, postoperative residual refractive cylinder, postoperative corneal cylinder, IOL misalignment, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were compared.

Results: We included 14 studies with 885 cataract eyes. All data were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) (https://revman.cochrane.org/). Cases of all preoperative outcomes showed no significant difference between image-guided group and manual group. There was no significant difference in postoperative UDVA (Standard mean difference (SMD: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.11, I2 = 59%, p = 0.33)), BCVA (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.18, I2 = 36%, p = 0.72), corneal cylinder (Weighted mean difference WMD: 0.13, 95% CI: -0.06 to -0.32, I2 = 0%, p = 0.17), IOP (WMD: -0.37, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.62, I2 = 9%, p = 0.46) between two groups. There was less residual refractive cylinder in image-guided group than in manual group (WMD: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.14, I2 = 59%, p<0.00001). It is more accurate in IOL alignment when combined with image-guided systems (WMD: -1.20, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.96, I2 = 14%, p < 0.00001).

Conclusion: Image-guided systems can improve the effect in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像引导系统在超声乳化人工晶状体植入术中的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨图像引导系统在超声乳化人工晶状体植入术中的应用效果。方法:检索Pubmed、Embase和中国国家知识基础设施数据库(成立至2021年1月20日)。两位研究者独立提取数据并评估论文质量。比较术前、术后未矫正距离视力(UDVA)、术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、术前柱状体、术后残余屈光柱状体、术后角膜柱状体、IOL错位、眼内压(IOP)。结果:我们纳入14项研究,885例白内障眼。所有数据均使用Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) (https://revman.cochrane.org/)完成。图像引导组与手工组的术前预后无显著差异。两组术后UDVA(标准平均差值(SMD: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.32 ~ 0.11, I2 = 59%, p = 0.33)、BCVA (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.12 ~ 0.18, I2 = 36%, p = 0.72)、角膜柱(加权平均差值WMD: 0.13, 95% CI: -0.06 ~ -0.32, I2 = 0%, p = 0.17)、IOP (WMD: -0.37, 95% CI: -1.36 ~ -0.62, I2 = 9%, p = 0.46)无显著差异。影像引导组的残余折射柱少于手动组(WMD: -0.20, 95% CI: -0.26 ~ -0.14, I2 = 59%, p<0.00001)。联合图像引导系统对人工晶状体的对准精度更高(WMD: -1.20, 95% CI: -1.43 ~ -0.96, I2 = 14%, p)结论:图像引导系统可提高超声乳化人工晶状体植入术的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bias in machine learning for computer-assisted surgery and medical image processing. Corrective osteotomy for complex tibial deformity in a patient with hereditary vitamin D-resistant hypophosphatemic rickets (HVDRR) using CT-based navigation system and 3D printed osteotomy model. Surgical declarative knowledge learning: concept and acceptability study. Effect of image-guided systems in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of research on path planning and control methods of flexible steerable needle puncture robot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1