"I don't think education is the answer": A corpus-assisted ecolinguistic analysis of plastics discourses in the UK.

Journal of world languages Pub Date : 2022-08-15 eCollection Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1515/jwl-2022-0017
Emma Franklin, Joanna Gavins, Seth Mehl
{"title":"\"I don't think education is the answer\": A corpus-assisted ecolinguistic analysis of plastics discourses in the UK.","authors":"Emma Franklin,&nbsp;Joanna Gavins,&nbsp;Seth Mehl","doi":"10.1515/jwl-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecosystems around the world are becoming engulfed in single-use plastics, the majority of which come from plastic packaging. Reusable plastic packaging systems have been proposed in response to this plastic waste crisis, but uptake of such systems in the UK is still very low. This article draws on a thematic corpus of 5.6 million words of UK English around plastics, packaging, reuse, and recycling to examine consumer attitudes towards plastic (re)use. Utilizing methods and insights from ecolinguistics, corpus linguistics, and cognitive linguistics, this article assesses to what degree consumer language differs from that of public-facing bodies such as supermarkets and government entities. A predefined ecosophy, prioritizing protection, rights, systems thinking, and fairness, is used to not only critically evaluate narratives in plastics discourse but also to recommend strategies for more effective and ecologically beneficial communications around plastics and reuse. This article recommends the adoption of ecosophy in multidisciplinary project teams, and argues that ecosophies are conducive to transparent and reproducible discourse analysis. The analysis also suggests that in order to make meaningful change in packaging reuse behaviors, it is highly likely that deeply ingrained cultural stories around power, rights, and responsibilities will need to be directly challenged.</p>","PeriodicalId":93793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of world languages","volume":"8 2","pages":"284-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563323/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of world languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ecosystems around the world are becoming engulfed in single-use plastics, the majority of which come from plastic packaging. Reusable plastic packaging systems have been proposed in response to this plastic waste crisis, but uptake of such systems in the UK is still very low. This article draws on a thematic corpus of 5.6 million words of UK English around plastics, packaging, reuse, and recycling to examine consumer attitudes towards plastic (re)use. Utilizing methods and insights from ecolinguistics, corpus linguistics, and cognitive linguistics, this article assesses to what degree consumer language differs from that of public-facing bodies such as supermarkets and government entities. A predefined ecosophy, prioritizing protection, rights, systems thinking, and fairness, is used to not only critically evaluate narratives in plastics discourse but also to recommend strategies for more effective and ecologically beneficial communications around plastics and reuse. This article recommends the adoption of ecosophy in multidisciplinary project teams, and argues that ecosophies are conducive to transparent and reproducible discourse analysis. The analysis also suggests that in order to make meaningful change in packaging reuse behaviors, it is highly likely that deeply ingrained cultural stories around power, rights, and responsibilities will need to be directly challenged.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我不认为教育是答案”:英国塑料语篇的语料库辅助生态语言学分析。
世界各地的生态系统正在被一次性塑料所吞没,其中大部分来自塑料包装。可重复使用的塑料包装系统已经提出,以应对这种塑料废物危机,但这种系统在英国的吸收仍然很低。这篇文章借鉴了关于塑料、包装、再利用和回收的560万单词的英国英语主题语料库,以调查消费者对塑料(再)使用的态度。利用生态语言学、语料库语言学和认知语言学的方法和见解,本文评估了消费者语言与面向公众的机构(如超市和政府机构)的语言差异程度。预先定义的生态理念,优先考虑保护,权利,系统思考和公平,不仅用于批判性地评估塑料话语中的叙述,还用于推荐围绕塑料和再利用的更有效和生态有益的沟通策略。本文建议在多学科项目团队中采用生态哲学,并认为生态哲学有助于透明和可复制的话语分析。分析还表明,为了在包装再利用行为上做出有意义的改变,很有可能需要直接挑战围绕权力、权利和责任的根深蒂固的文化故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anastazija Kirkova-Naskova, Alice Henderson & Jonás Fouz-González (eds.). 2021. English pronunciation instruction: Research-based insights. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. xix+388 pp. ISBN: 978-90-272-0935-1(hbk) J. R. Martin, Beatriz Quiroz & Pin Wang. 2023. Systemic functional grammar: A text-based description of English, Spanish and Chinese Arran Stibbe. 2024. Econarrative: Ethics, ecology, and the search for new narratives to live by. London: Bloomsbury, x+278pp. ISBN: 978-1-3502-6312-3 (hbk) Positive discourse analysis of Aotearoa New Zealand Foreign Minister’s speeches: an ecolinguistic perspective “Spoken and monologic”: modelling oratory, past and present, through the framework of systemic functional linguistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1