Agent-Based Modeling: an Underutilized Tool in Community Violence Research.

3区 医学 Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s40471-022-00292-x
Jason E Goldstick, Jonathan Jay
{"title":"Agent-Based Modeling: an Underutilized Tool in Community Violence Research.","authors":"Jason E Goldstick,&nbsp;Jonathan Jay","doi":"10.1007/s40471-022-00292-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Community violence is a serious public health problem, and generational investments are being made to address it. Agent-based models (ABMs) are computational tools that can help to optimize allocation of those investments, analogous to how computer simulation models, broadly, have informed decision making in other fields, such as infectious disease control. In this review, we describe ABMs, explain their potential role in community violence research, discuss recent studies that have applied ABMs to community violence, and point to opportunities for further progress.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>We identified three recent studies that applied ABMs to community violence research, which points to the paucity of this line of work. Each of these works leverages a major advantage of ABMs-their ability to study the natural evolution of a process governed by the actions of autonomous agents, and how that evolution changes under counterfactual conditions, such as different intervention strategies (e.g., violence interruption), and policy changes (e.g., alcohol outlet licensing policies).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>ABMs continue to be an underutilized tool for the study of community violence. Their increased use could add important information to help stakeholders decide between competing intervention strategies in terms of their costs and the overall resulting changes in violence rates. In addition, ABMs have value in identifying unintended changes/diffusions resulting from interventions. Regardless of the application, ABMs can only be impactful if stakeholders believe and use the information, pointing to the importance of engaging policy makers and other stakeholders in the model formulation process when possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9263807/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00292-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose of review: Community violence is a serious public health problem, and generational investments are being made to address it. Agent-based models (ABMs) are computational tools that can help to optimize allocation of those investments, analogous to how computer simulation models, broadly, have informed decision making in other fields, such as infectious disease control. In this review, we describe ABMs, explain their potential role in community violence research, discuss recent studies that have applied ABMs to community violence, and point to opportunities for further progress.

Recent findings: We identified three recent studies that applied ABMs to community violence research, which points to the paucity of this line of work. Each of these works leverages a major advantage of ABMs-their ability to study the natural evolution of a process governed by the actions of autonomous agents, and how that evolution changes under counterfactual conditions, such as different intervention strategies (e.g., violence interruption), and policy changes (e.g., alcohol outlet licensing policies).

Summary: ABMs continue to be an underutilized tool for the study of community violence. Their increased use could add important information to help stakeholders decide between competing intervention strategies in terms of their costs and the overall resulting changes in violence rates. In addition, ABMs have value in identifying unintended changes/diffusions resulting from interventions. Regardless of the application, ABMs can only be impactful if stakeholders believe and use the information, pointing to the importance of engaging policy makers and other stakeholders in the model formulation process when possible.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于主体的建模:社区暴力研究中未充分利用的工具。
审查目的:社区暴力是一个严重的公共卫生问题,正在进行世代投资以解决这一问题。基于主体的模型(ABMs)是有助于优化这些投资分配的计算工具,类似于计算机模拟模型在传染病控制等其他领域为决策提供信息的方式。在这篇综述中,我们描述了ABMs,解释了它们在社区暴力研究中的潜在作用,讨论了最近将ABMs应用于社区暴力的研究,并指出了进一步发展的机会。最近的研究发现:我们确定了三项将ABMs应用于社区暴力研究的最新研究,这表明这方面的工作很缺乏。这些工作都利用了abms的一个主要优势——它们能够研究由自主代理的行为控制的过程的自然演变,以及这种演变在反事实条件下如何变化,例如不同的干预策略(例如,暴力中断)和政策变化(例如,酒类出口许可政策)。摘要:ABMs仍然是研究社区暴力的一个未充分利用的工具。更多地使用这些工具可以增加重要信息,帮助利益攸关方在竞争性干预战略的成本和由此导致的暴力率总体变化之间做出决定。此外,ABMs在识别干预措施导致的意外变化/扩散方面具有价值。不管应用是什么,只有在利益相关者相信并使用这些信息的情况下,ABMs才会产生影响,这表明在可能的情况下,让政策制定者和其他利益相关者参与模型制定过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Gentrification and Health: A Review of the Literature, 2018–2023 The Target Cohort Approach: An Extension of the Target Trial Framework to Nested Case-Control Studies with Incidence Density Sampling The Intersection of the Microbiome and Adiposity in Cancer Risk and Outcomes: Breast, Endometrial, and Colorectal Cancers Towards a Precision Model for Environmental Public Health: Wastewater-based Epidemiology to Assess Population-level Exposures and Related Diseases Vitamin D and Toxic Metals in Pregnancy - a Biological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1