Clinic Follow up and Neurological Disability in Children Following Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Rupture of Membranes and Preeclampsia.

Journal of childhood & developmental disorders Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-31
Laura Paulson, Dianne Thornhill, Jennifer Armstrong
{"title":"Clinic Follow up and Neurological Disability in Children Following Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Rupture of Membranes and Preeclampsia.","authors":"Laura Paulson, Dianne Thornhill, Jennifer Armstrong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Preeclampsia and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) have been associated with perinatal brain injury. Despite a strong understanding of the relationships between preterm birth and neurologic deficits, and between PPROM and preeclampsia and preterm birth, the relationship between PPROM and preeclampsia and neurologic disability is not well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared trends in neurologic deficits in children born to mothers with these conditions and described differences in patient characteristics among follow up visit attendance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of women with preeclampsia or PPROM. Neurologic deficits were assessed with the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure at follow up visits through age 10 years. Eighty nine of the 178 women enrolled completed at least one follow up. Results: Among children born >32 weeks, PPROM showed higher left and right sided sensorimotor deficits at initial follow (p=0.045, p=0.01). In children born ≤ 32 weeks, preeclampsia had higher language production deficits at 3 year follow up (p=0.05).Sensorimotor deficits were greater and sustained in PPROM. Language production deficits were predominant among after 2 years of age in preeclampsia. Racial disparities were found in clinic attendance rates, with Black families most affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in neurodevelopmental patterns suggest differences in underlying neuronal injuries. Neurologic assessment should occur routinely throughout early childhood to detect delayed deficits after PPROM and preeclampsia and ensure inclusion of underserved or at risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":92067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of childhood & developmental disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9245330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of childhood & developmental disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Preeclampsia and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) have been associated with perinatal brain injury. Despite a strong understanding of the relationships between preterm birth and neurologic deficits, and between PPROM and preeclampsia and preterm birth, the relationship between PPROM and preeclampsia and neurologic disability is not well characterized.

Objective: We compared trends in neurologic deficits in children born to mothers with these conditions and described differences in patient characteristics among follow up visit attendance.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of women with preeclampsia or PPROM. Neurologic deficits were assessed with the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure at follow up visits through age 10 years. Eighty nine of the 178 women enrolled completed at least one follow up. Results: Among children born >32 weeks, PPROM showed higher left and right sided sensorimotor deficits at initial follow (p=0.045, p=0.01). In children born ≤ 32 weeks, preeclampsia had higher language production deficits at 3 year follow up (p=0.05).Sensorimotor deficits were greater and sustained in PPROM. Language production deficits were predominant among after 2 years of age in preeclampsia. Racial disparities were found in clinic attendance rates, with Black families most affected.

Conclusion: Differences in neurodevelopmental patterns suggest differences in underlying neuronal injuries. Neurologic assessment should occur routinely throughout early childhood to detect delayed deficits after PPROM and preeclampsia and ensure inclusion of underserved or at risk populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因胎膜早破和子痫前期并发症而怀孕的儿童的临床随访和神经系统残疾。
背景:先兆子痫和早产胎膜早破(PPROM)与围产期脑损伤有关。尽管人们对早产和神经系统缺陷之间的关系以及子痫前期和早产之间的关系有了深入的了解,但子痫前期和早产与神经系统残疾之间的关系还没有得到很好的描述:我们比较了患有这些疾病的母亲所生婴儿神经系统缺陷的趋势,并描述了随访患者特征的差异:我们对患有子痫前期或早产儿猝死症的妇女进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。方法:我们对患有子痫前期或先兆子痫的妇女进行了前瞻性队列研究,在 10 岁前的随访中使用儿科卒中结果测量法评估了她们的神经功能缺损情况。在 178 名登记的妇女中,有 89 名完成了至少一次随访。研究结果在出生大于 32 周的患儿中,PPROM 患儿在初次随访时左侧和右侧感觉运动障碍程度较高(P=0.045,P=0.01)。在出生不足 32 周的儿童中,先兆子痫患儿在 3 年随访时的语言表达障碍程度更高(p=0.05)。先兆子痫患者两岁后主要出现语言表达障碍。在就诊率方面发现了种族差异,黑人家庭受影响最大:结论:神经发育模式的差异表明潜在的神经元损伤存在差异。神经系统评估应在整个幼儿期常规进行,以检测先兆流产和子痫前期后的延迟性缺陷,并确保纳入服务不足或高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinic Follow up and Neurological Disability in Children Following Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Rupture of Membranes and Preeclampsia. Educating a Child with Down Syndrome in an Inclusive Kindergarten Classroom The Cardiac Autonomic Control System Response to Submaximal Exercise Test in Children with Cerebral Palsy Compared to Typical Peer The Potential Benefits of PTH Analogs in Prevention of Pathological Fractures in Cerebral Palsy Conners 3-Parent (Short): Measurement Invariance Across Gender, Concurrent and Discriminant Validities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1