Strengthening the Case for Universal Health Literacy: The Dispersion of Health Literacy Experiences Across a Southern U.S. State.

Q2 Medicine Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-08 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20220620-01
Iris Feinberg, Elizabeth L Tighe, Michelle M Ogrodnick
{"title":"Strengthening the Case for Universal Health Literacy: The Dispersion of Health Literacy Experiences Across a Southern U.S. State.","authors":"Iris Feinberg,&nbsp;Elizabeth L Tighe,&nbsp;Michelle M Ogrodnick","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220620-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How individuals perceive their health literacy may differ based on demographic and individual characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand the dispersion of health literacy across demographics in the state of Georgia in 2021 and to determine which factors influence health literacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study participants were age 18 years and older and completed an on-line Health Literacy Questionnaire (<i>N</i> = 520). The participant pool was stratified to mirror state-wide demographics of geography and race. Results were further collapsed into composite scales reflecting basic, communicative, and critical health literacy. Descriptive statistics, bivariate Pearson's correlations, and multiple regression analyses were used. A two-step cluster analysis was performed with the nine health literacy scales.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Rural county and no health insurance were negatively related to all three composite scales (<i>rs</i> = .093-.254, <i>ps</i> < .05). Demographic predictors accounted for 6.7% of the variance in basic (F[6, 439] = 5.287, <i>p</i> < .001), 10% in communicative (F[6, 438] = 8.154, <i>p</i> < .001), and 6% for critical (F[6, 439] = 4.675, <i>p</i> < .0010. In all scales, health insurance status was the strongest primary unique predictor (<i>βs</i> = .236, .295, .181, ps <.05, respectively). In a two-step cluster analysis only health insurance status differentiated the health literacy level clusters (<i>X</i><sup>2</sup>(3) = 9.43, 34.51, <i>ps</i> = 024, <.001 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lacking health insurance is the most consistent and largest contributor to low health literacy across the state of Georgia; population demographics are not. Health literacy policies and practices should be developed for universal application and not focus on specific populations. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(3):e182-e190.</b>] Plain Language Summary: In this study, demographics that are usually associated with low health literacy like age, sex, race, educational attainment, and type of county (rural or urban) were not associated with; the only significant factor was lack of health insurance. This relationship strengthens the case for universal health literacy precautions that go beyond population demographics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"e182-e190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272571/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220620-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: How individuals perceive their health literacy may differ based on demographic and individual characteristics.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the dispersion of health literacy across demographics in the state of Georgia in 2021 and to determine which factors influence health literacy.

Methods: Study participants were age 18 years and older and completed an on-line Health Literacy Questionnaire (N = 520). The participant pool was stratified to mirror state-wide demographics of geography and race. Results were further collapsed into composite scales reflecting basic, communicative, and critical health literacy. Descriptive statistics, bivariate Pearson's correlations, and multiple regression analyses were used. A two-step cluster analysis was performed with the nine health literacy scales.

Key results: Rural county and no health insurance were negatively related to all three composite scales (rs = .093-.254, ps < .05). Demographic predictors accounted for 6.7% of the variance in basic (F[6, 439] = 5.287, p < .001), 10% in communicative (F[6, 438] = 8.154, p < .001), and 6% for critical (F[6, 439] = 4.675, p < .0010. In all scales, health insurance status was the strongest primary unique predictor (βs = .236, .295, .181, ps <.05, respectively). In a two-step cluster analysis only health insurance status differentiated the health literacy level clusters (X2(3) = 9.43, 34.51, ps = 024, <.001 respectively).

Conclusion: Lacking health insurance is the most consistent and largest contributor to low health literacy across the state of Georgia; population demographics are not. Health literacy policies and practices should be developed for universal application and not focus on specific populations. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(3):e182-e190.] Plain Language Summary: In this study, demographics that are usually associated with low health literacy like age, sex, race, educational attainment, and type of county (rural or urban) were not associated with; the only significant factor was lack of health insurance. This relationship strengthens the case for universal health literacy precautions that go beyond population demographics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强全民健康素养的案例:健康素养经验在美国南部各州的分散。
背景:个人如何感知他们的健康素养可能会根据人口统计学和个人特征而有所不同。目的:本研究的目的是了解2021年佐治亚州人口健康素养的分布情况,并确定影响健康素养的因素。方法:研究参与者年龄在18岁及以上,完成在线健康素养问卷(N = 520)。参与者池被分层,以反映全州的地理和种族人口统计。结果进一步分解为反映基本、交流和关键健康素养的复合量表。采用描述性统计、双变量Pearson相关和多元回归分析。采用九种健康素养量表进行两步聚类分析。关键结果:农村县和无医疗保险在三个综合量表上均呈负相关(rs = 0.093 -。254, ps < 0.05)。人口学预测因子在基础(F[6,439] = 5.287, p < 0.001)中占6.7%,在交际(F[6,438] = 8.154, p < 0.001)中占10%,在关键(F[6,439] = 4.675, p < 0.001)中占6%。在所有量表中,健康保险状况是最强的主要独特预测因子(βs = .236, .295, .181, ps X2(3) = 9.43, 34.51, ps = 024)。结论:缺乏健康保险是佐治亚州健康素养低的最一致和最大的因素;人口统计数据则不然。卫生扫盲政策和做法的制定应面向普遍适用,而不是侧重于特定人群。健康素养研究与实践[j] .中国卫生科学,2012;6(3):882 - 890。摘要:在这项研究中,通常与低健康素养相关的人口统计数据,如年龄、性别、种族、受教育程度和县类型(农村或城市)与;唯一重要的因素是缺乏医疗保险。这种关系加强了超越人口统计的普及卫生知识预防措施的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1