Som P Singh, Fahad M Qureshi, Kiera G Borthwick, Sagar Singh, Shreya Menon, Brandon Barthel
{"title":"Comprehension Profile of Patient Education Materials in Endocrine Care.","authors":"Som P Singh, Fahad M Qureshi, Kiera G Borthwick, Sagar Singh, Shreya Menon, Brandon Barthel","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The internet is an ever-evolving resource to improve healthcare literacy among patients. The nature of the internet can make it difficult to condense educational materials in a manner applicable to a worldwide patient audience. Within the realm of endocrinology, there is lack of a comprehensive analysis regarding these pathologies in addition to education materials related to their medical work-up or management. The aim of this study was to assess contemporary online patient education material in endocrinology and management of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of the readability of 1,500 unique online education materials was performed utilizing seven readability measures: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index Readability Formula (FOG), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), automated readability index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average grade level readability scores from six measures (e.g., FKGL, FOG, SMOG, CLI, ARI, LWF) was more than or equal to 11 which corresponds to a reading level at or above the 11th grade. The average FRE between adrenal, diabetes, and thyroid-related education m aterial ranged between \"fairly difficult\" to \"very difficult\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The readability of contemporary online endocrine education material did not meet current readability recommendations for appropriate comprehension of the general audience.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"247-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/cd/15-247.PMC9311631.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction: The internet is an ever-evolving resource to improve healthcare literacy among patients. The nature of the internet can make it difficult to condense educational materials in a manner applicable to a worldwide patient audience. Within the realm of endocrinology, there is lack of a comprehensive analysis regarding these pathologies in addition to education materials related to their medical work-up or management. The aim of this study was to assess contemporary online patient education material in endocrinology and management of care.
Methods: Analysis of the readability of 1,500 unique online education materials was performed utilizing seven readability measures: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index Readability Formula (FOG), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), automated readability index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF).
Results: The average grade level readability scores from six measures (e.g., FKGL, FOG, SMOG, CLI, ARI, LWF) was more than or equal to 11 which corresponds to a reading level at or above the 11th grade. The average FRE between adrenal, diabetes, and thyroid-related education m aterial ranged between "fairly difficult" to "very difficult".
Conclusions: The readability of contemporary online endocrine education material did not meet current readability recommendations for appropriate comprehension of the general audience.
互联网是一种不断发展的资源,可以提高患者的医疗保健素养。互联网的性质可能使其难以以一种适用于全世界耐心的听众的方式浓缩教育材料。在内分泌学领域,除了与其医疗检查或管理相关的教育材料外,还缺乏对这些病理的全面分析。本研究的目的是评估内分泌学和护理管理方面的当代在线患者教育材料。方法:采用Flesch Reading Ease (FRE)、Flesch- kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)、Gunning Fog Index可读性公式(Fog)、Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG)、Coleman-Liau Index (CLI)、automated可读性指数(ARI)和Linsear Write Formula (LWF) 7种可读性指标对1500种独特的在线教材进行可读性分析。结果:FKGL、FOG、SMOG、CLI、ARI、LWF等6项测试的平均年级阅读水平得分大于等于11分,对应于11年级以上的阅读水平。肾上腺、糖尿病和甲状腺相关教育材料的平均FRE介于“相当难”到“非常难”之间。结论:当代在线内分泌教育材料的可读性不符合当前推荐的一般受众适当理解的可读性。