Facing hierarchy: a qualitative study of residents' experiences in an obstetrical simulation scenario.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2022-10-23 DOI:10.1186/s41077-022-00232-1
Adam B Garber, Glenn Posner, Taylor Roebotham, M Dylan Bould, Taryn Taylor
{"title":"Facing hierarchy: a qualitative study of residents' experiences in an obstetrical simulation scenario.","authors":"Adam B Garber,&nbsp;Glenn Posner,&nbsp;Taylor Roebotham,&nbsp;M Dylan Bould,&nbsp;Taryn Taylor","doi":"10.1186/s41077-022-00232-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residents in surgical specialties face a steep hierarchy when managing medical crises. Hierarchy can negatively impact patient safety when team members are reluctant to speak up. Yet, simulation has scarcely been previously utilized to qualitatively explore the way residents in surgical specialities navigate this challenge. The study aimed to explore the experiences of residents in one surgical specialty, obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn), when challenging hierarchy, with the goal of informing future interventions to optimize resident learning and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight 3rd- and 4th-year Ob/Gyn residents participated in a simulation scenario in which their supervising physician made an erroneous medical decision that jeopardized the wellbeing of the labouring mother and her foetus. Residents participated in 30-45 min semi-structured interviews that explored their approach to managing this scenario. Transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic inquiry by three research team members, finalizing the identified themes once consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study results show that the simulated scenario did create an experience of hierarchy that challenged residents. In response, residents adopted three distinct communication strategies while confronting hierarchy: (1) messaging - a mere reporting of existing clinical information; (2) interpretive - a deliberate construction of clinical facts aimed at swaying supervising physician's clinical decision; and (3) advocative - a readiness to confront the staff physician's clinical decision. Furthermore, residents utilized coping mechanisms to mitigate challenges related to confronting hierarchy, namely deflecting responsibility, diminishing urgency, and drafting allies. Both these communication strategies and coping mechanisms shaped their practice when challenging hierarchy to preserve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the complex processes in which residents engage when confronting hierarchy can serve to inform the development and study of curricular innovations. Informed by these processes, we must move beyond solely teaching residents to speak up and consider a broader curriculum that targets not only residents but also faculty physicians and the learning environment within the organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9590210/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00232-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Residents in surgical specialties face a steep hierarchy when managing medical crises. Hierarchy can negatively impact patient safety when team members are reluctant to speak up. Yet, simulation has scarcely been previously utilized to qualitatively explore the way residents in surgical specialities navigate this challenge. The study aimed to explore the experiences of residents in one surgical specialty, obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn), when challenging hierarchy, with the goal of informing future interventions to optimize resident learning and patient safety.

Methods: Eight 3rd- and 4th-year Ob/Gyn residents participated in a simulation scenario in which their supervising physician made an erroneous medical decision that jeopardized the wellbeing of the labouring mother and her foetus. Residents participated in 30-45 min semi-structured interviews that explored their approach to managing this scenario. Transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic inquiry by three research team members, finalizing the identified themes once consensus was reached.

Results: Study results show that the simulated scenario did create an experience of hierarchy that challenged residents. In response, residents adopted three distinct communication strategies while confronting hierarchy: (1) messaging - a mere reporting of existing clinical information; (2) interpretive - a deliberate construction of clinical facts aimed at swaying supervising physician's clinical decision; and (3) advocative - a readiness to confront the staff physician's clinical decision. Furthermore, residents utilized coping mechanisms to mitigate challenges related to confronting hierarchy, namely deflecting responsibility, diminishing urgency, and drafting allies. Both these communication strategies and coping mechanisms shaped their practice when challenging hierarchy to preserve patient safety.

Conclusions: Understanding the complex processes in which residents engage when confronting hierarchy can serve to inform the development and study of curricular innovations. Informed by these processes, we must move beyond solely teaching residents to speak up and consider a broader curriculum that targets not only residents but also faculty physicians and the learning environment within the organization.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对层级:产科模拟情境中住院医师经验的定性研究。
背景:外科专业的住院医生在处理医疗危机时面临着一个陡峭的等级制度。当团队成员不愿意说出来时,等级制度会对患者安全产生负面影响。然而,以前很少利用模拟来定性地探索外科专业居民应对这一挑战的方式。本研究旨在探讨妇产科(Ob/Gyn)这一外科专业的住院医生在挑战等级制度时的经验,目的是为未来的干预措施提供信息,以优化住院医生的学习和患者的安全。方法:8名三年级和四年级的妇产科住院医师参与了一个模拟场景,在这个场景中,他们的指导医生做出了一个错误的医疗决定,危及了分娩母亲和胎儿的健康。居民参加了30-45分钟的半结构化访谈,探讨他们管理这种情况的方法。三位研究小组成员使用定性专题调查分析了记录的访谈,一旦达成共识,就确定了确定的主题。结果:研究结果表明,模拟场景确实创造了一种挑战居民的等级体验。作为回应,住院医生在面对等级制度时采取了三种不同的沟通策略:(1)信息传递——仅仅报告现有的临床信息;(2)解释性——故意构建临床事实,目的是动摇监督医师的临床决策;(3)倡导-准备好面对工作人员医生的临床决定。此外,居民利用应对机制来缓解与对抗等级制度相关的挑战,即转移责任、降低紧迫性和起草盟友。这些沟通策略和应对机制都影响了他们在挑战等级制度以保护患者安全时的实践。结论:了解居民在面对等级制度时参与的复杂过程可以为课程创新的发展和研究提供信息。通过这些过程,我们必须超越仅仅教住院医生说出来,并考虑一个更广泛的课程,不仅针对住院医生,也针对医生和组织内的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice. Reclaiming identities: exploring the influence of simulation on refugee doctors' workforce integration. TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training. Theoretical foundations and implications of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality for immersive learning in health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1