The State of Patient Engagement among Pain Research Trainees in Canada: Results of a National Web-Based Survey.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur Pub Date : 2022-10-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/24740527.2022.2115879
Kyle Vader, Perri R Tutelman, Delane Linkiewich, Catherine Paré, Alice Wagenaar-Tison, Kathryn A Birnie, Christine T Chambers, Kathleen Eubanks, Nader Ghasemlou, Janet Gunderson, Maria Hudspith, Therese Lane, Jordan Miller, Dawn P Richards
{"title":"The State of Patient Engagement among Pain Research Trainees in Canada: Results of a National Web-Based Survey.","authors":"Kyle Vader,&nbsp;Perri R Tutelman,&nbsp;Delane Linkiewich,&nbsp;Catherine Paré,&nbsp;Alice Wagenaar-Tison,&nbsp;Kathryn A Birnie,&nbsp;Christine T Chambers,&nbsp;Kathleen Eubanks,&nbsp;Nader Ghasemlou,&nbsp;Janet Gunderson,&nbsp;Maria Hudspith,&nbsp;Therese Lane,&nbsp;Jordan Miller,&nbsp;Dawn P Richards","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2022.2115879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient engagement (PE) in research refers to partnering with people with lived experience (e.g., patients, caregivers, family) as collaborators in the research process. Although PE is increasingly being recognized as an important aspect of health research, the current state of PE among pain research trainees in Canada is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were to describe perspectives about and experiences with PE among trainees conducting pain research in Canada, to identify perceived barriers and facilitators, and to describe recommendations to improve its implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional web-based survey (English and French) was administered to trainees at any level conducting pain research at any Canadian academic institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 128 responses were received; 115 responses were complete and included in the final analysis. The majority of respondents identified as women (90/115; 78.3%), in graduate school (83/115; 72.2%), and conducting clinical pain research (83/115; 72.2%). Most respondents (103/115; 89.6%) indicated that PE is \"very\" or \"extremely\" important. Despite this, only a minority of respondents (23/111; 20.7%) indicated that they \"often\" or \"always\" implement PE within their own research. The most common barrier identified was lack of knowledge regarding the practical implementation of PE, and understanding its positive value was the most commonly reported facilitator. Recommendations for improving the implementation of PE were diverse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite viewing PE as important in research, a minority of pain research trainees regularly implement PE. Results highlight perceived barriers and facilitators to PE and provide insight to inform the development of future training and other enabling initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9586693/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2115879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement (PE) in research refers to partnering with people with lived experience (e.g., patients, caregivers, family) as collaborators in the research process. Although PE is increasingly being recognized as an important aspect of health research, the current state of PE among pain research trainees in Canada is unclear.

Aims: The aims of this study were to describe perspectives about and experiences with PE among trainees conducting pain research in Canada, to identify perceived barriers and facilitators, and to describe recommendations to improve its implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey (English and French) was administered to trainees at any level conducting pain research at any Canadian academic institution.

Results: A total of 128 responses were received; 115 responses were complete and included in the final analysis. The majority of respondents identified as women (90/115; 78.3%), in graduate school (83/115; 72.2%), and conducting clinical pain research (83/115; 72.2%). Most respondents (103/115; 89.6%) indicated that PE is "very" or "extremely" important. Despite this, only a minority of respondents (23/111; 20.7%) indicated that they "often" or "always" implement PE within their own research. The most common barrier identified was lack of knowledge regarding the practical implementation of PE, and understanding its positive value was the most commonly reported facilitator. Recommendations for improving the implementation of PE were diverse.

Conclusions: Despite viewing PE as important in research, a minority of pain research trainees regularly implement PE. Results highlight perceived barriers and facilitators to PE and provide insight to inform the development of future training and other enabling initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大疼痛研究受训人员的患者参与状况:一项全国性网络调查的结果。
背景:研究中的患者参与(PE)是指在研究过程中与有生活经验的人(例如,患者,护理人员,家属)合作作为合作者。尽管体育运动越来越被认为是健康研究的一个重要方面,但目前加拿大疼痛研究学员的体育运动状况尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是描述在加拿大进行疼痛研究的受训者对PE的看法和经验,确定感知到的障碍和促进因素,并描述改进其实施的建议。方法:对在加拿大任何学术机构进行疼痛研究的任何级别的学员进行基于网络的横断面调查(英语和法语)。结果:共收到回复128份;115份回复已完成并纳入最终分析。大多数答复者确定为妇女(90/115;78.3%),研究生院(83/115;72.2%),进行临床疼痛研究(83/115;72.2%)。大多数答复者(103/115;89.6%)认为体育“非常”或“极其”重要。尽管如此,只有少数受访者(23/111;20.7%)表示他们“经常”或“总是”在自己的研究中实施体育锻炼。发现的最常见障碍是缺乏关于PE实际实施的知识,而了解其积极价值是最常见的促进因素。关于改进PE实施的建议多种多样。结论:尽管认为体育锻炼在研究中很重要,但少数疼痛研究受训者定期实施体育锻炼。结果突出了体育运动的障碍和促进因素,并为未来培训和其他扶持举措的发展提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Assessing Quality of Referrals to a Community-Based Chronic Pain Clinic. The Influence of Loneliness on Pain Outcomes for Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Chronic pain experiences of immigrant Indian women in Canada: A photovoice exploration. [Enhancing Chronic Pain Management: Exploring the Essential Contribution of Primary Care Nurses]. Randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of a multimodal mobile application for the treatment of chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1