Construction of a Clinical Predictive Model of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Thrombi in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI:10.1155/2022/7806027
Lei Yin, Changjian He, Huixin Zheng, Jianshuai Ma, Jinting Liu, Xiaohong Zhang, Ruiqin Xie
{"title":"Construction of a Clinical Predictive Model of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Thrombi in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"Lei Yin,&nbsp;Changjian He,&nbsp;Huixin Zheng,&nbsp;Jianshuai Ma,&nbsp;Jinting Liu,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhang,&nbsp;Ruiqin Xie","doi":"10.1155/2022/7806027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors of left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to establish and validate relevant predictive models. It might improve thromboembolic risk stratification in patients with NVAF. <i>Methods</i>. This study retrospectively included 1210 consecutive patients with NVAF undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), of whom 139 patients had thrombi in LA or in LAA. Through literature review and the ten events per variable (10EPV) principle, 13 variables were finally identified for inclusion in multivariate analysis. Models were constructed by multivariate logistic stepwise regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression. <i>Results</i>. After logistic regression, five variables (AF type, age, B-type natriuretic peptide, <i>E</i>/<i>e</i>’ ratio, and left atrial diameter) were finally screened out as model 1. After Lasso regression, AF type, age, gender, B-type natriuretic peptide, E/e’ ratio, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction were finally screened as model 2. After comparing the two models, the simpler model 1 was finally selected. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the model 1 was 0.865 (95% CI: 0.838–0.892), the Hosmer–Lemeshow test = 0.898, and the AUC = 0.861 after internal validation. The clinical decision curve showed that the new clinical prediction model could achieve a net clinical benefit when the expected threshold was between 0 and 0.6. <i>Conclusion</i>. This study constructed a new clinical prediction model of LA or LAA thrombi, with a higher discriminative degree than the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scoring systems (AUC: 0.865 vs. 0.643; AUC: 0.865 vs 0.652).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9652078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/7806027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors of left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to establish and validate relevant predictive models. It might improve thromboembolic risk stratification in patients with NVAF. Methods. This study retrospectively included 1210 consecutive patients with NVAF undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), of whom 139 patients had thrombi in LA or in LAA. Through literature review and the ten events per variable (10EPV) principle, 13 variables were finally identified for inclusion in multivariate analysis. Models were constructed by multivariate logistic stepwise regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression. Results. After logistic regression, five variables (AF type, age, B-type natriuretic peptide, E/e’ ratio, and left atrial diameter) were finally screened out as model 1. After Lasso regression, AF type, age, gender, B-type natriuretic peptide, E/e’ ratio, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction were finally screened as model 2. After comparing the two models, the simpler model 1 was finally selected. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the model 1 was 0.865 (95% CI: 0.838–0.892), the Hosmer–Lemeshow test = 0.898, and the AUC = 0.861 after internal validation. The clinical decision curve showed that the new clinical prediction model could achieve a net clinical benefit when the expected threshold was between 0 and 0.6. Conclusion. This study constructed a new clinical prediction model of LA or LAA thrombi, with a higher discriminative degree than the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scoring systems (AUC: 0.865 vs. 0.643; AUC: 0.865 vs 0.652).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心房及左心房附件血栓临床预测模型的建立。
背景:本研究旨在探讨非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者发生左房(LA)或左房附件(LAA)血栓的危险因素,建立并验证相关预测模型。它可能改善非瓣膜性房颤患者的血栓栓塞风险分层。方法:本研究回顾性纳入1210例连续接受经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查的非瓣膜性房颤患者,其中139例在LA或LAA有血栓。通过文献回顾和每变量十事件(10EPV)原则,最终确定13个变量纳入多变量分析。采用多元逻辑逐步回归、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(lasso)回归构建模型。结果:经logistic回归,最终筛选出房型、年龄、b型利钠肽、E/ E′比、左房内径5个变量作为模型1。经Lasso回归,最终筛选出AF型、年龄、性别、b型利钠肽、E/ E′比值、左房内径、左室射血分数作为模型2。经过两种模型的比较,最终选择了较为简单的模型1。模型1的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.865 (95% CI: 0.838 ~ 0.892), Hosmer-Lemeshow检验= 0.898,内部验证的AUC = 0.861。临床决策曲线显示,当预期阈值在0 ~ 0.6之间时,新的临床预测模型可以实现临床净获益。结论:本研究构建了新的LA或LAA血栓临床预测模型,其鉴别度高于CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分系统(AUC: 0.865 vs 0.643;AUC: 0.865 vs 0.652)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial” Complete Revascularization Techniques for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiography- and Coronary Physiology-Guided PCI Predictors for Sedation Failure in Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1