Comparison of home and office blood pressure in hypertensive patients treated with zofenopril or losartan.

Krzysztof Narkiewicz
{"title":"Comparison of home and office blood pressure in hypertensive patients treated with zofenopril or losartan.","authors":"Krzysztof Narkiewicz","doi":"10.1080/08038020701561687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a parallel double-blind multicentre study, 375 hypertensive patients were enrolled and treated with either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) zofenopril 30 mg once daily (titration 60 mg od) or the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist losartan 50 mg od (titration 100 mg od). Patients with mild to moderate hypertension, defined as a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 110 mmHg in the sitting position without other signs of cardiovascular disease were enrolled and treated for 12 weeks. BP was assessed in the clinic, and self-measured by the patients at home during a working day and a holiday, as well as before and at the clinic follow-ups. Systolic (SBP) and DBP were significantly reduced in both treatment groups to a similar extent at the end of the 12-week study. However, the immediate or early reduction of DBP as well as DBP reduction over the first month was significantly greater with zofenopril (p= 0 .01 and p= 0 .003, respectively) compared with losartan treatment. After 3 months of treatment and dose up-titration, clinic BP reductions were similar in both groups. However, more subjects with losartan had used a higher dose step (42.1%) compared with zofenopril (33.1%). Home BP assessments demonstrated that systolic and diastolic pressures were substantially lower than the BP measurements made by sphygmomanometer in the clinic. In particular, assessments 2-3 days before the clinic visits during working days and holidays were characteristically lower, while the measurements during the clinic visits were largely similar to the conventional BP measurements by the doctor. The number and the severity of adverse events, related to the study medications, were largely benign and similar in both groups. The present study demonstrates that zofenopril in clinically recommended doses is at least therapeutically equivalent to losartan treatment, when assessed by conventional sphygmomanometry at the doctor's office or at home by self-measured BP assessments by the patients. Zofenopril however, induces a more rapid initial lowering of BP over the first month of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"2 ","pages":"7-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08038020701561687","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038020701561687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In a parallel double-blind multicentre study, 375 hypertensive patients were enrolled and treated with either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) zofenopril 30 mg once daily (titration 60 mg od) or the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist losartan 50 mg od (titration 100 mg od). Patients with mild to moderate hypertension, defined as a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 110 mmHg in the sitting position without other signs of cardiovascular disease were enrolled and treated for 12 weeks. BP was assessed in the clinic, and self-measured by the patients at home during a working day and a holiday, as well as before and at the clinic follow-ups. Systolic (SBP) and DBP were significantly reduced in both treatment groups to a similar extent at the end of the 12-week study. However, the immediate or early reduction of DBP as well as DBP reduction over the first month was significantly greater with zofenopril (p= 0 .01 and p= 0 .003, respectively) compared with losartan treatment. After 3 months of treatment and dose up-titration, clinic BP reductions were similar in both groups. However, more subjects with losartan had used a higher dose step (42.1%) compared with zofenopril (33.1%). Home BP assessments demonstrated that systolic and diastolic pressures were substantially lower than the BP measurements made by sphygmomanometer in the clinic. In particular, assessments 2-3 days before the clinic visits during working days and holidays were characteristically lower, while the measurements during the clinic visits were largely similar to the conventional BP measurements by the doctor. The number and the severity of adverse events, related to the study medications, were largely benign and similar in both groups. The present study demonstrates that zofenopril in clinically recommended doses is at least therapeutically equivalent to losartan treatment, when assessed by conventional sphygmomanometry at the doctor's office or at home by self-measured BP assessments by the patients. Zofenopril however, induces a more rapid initial lowering of BP over the first month of therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唑非普利或氯沙坦治疗高血压患者家庭和办公室血压的比较。
在一项平行双盲多中心研究中,招募了375名高血压患者,并使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)佐非普利30 mg每日1次(滴定60 mg od)或血管紧张素II型1受体(AT1)拮抗剂氯沙坦50 mg od(滴定100 mg od)治疗。轻度至中度高血压患者,定义为坐位舒张压(DBP)在95至110 mmHg之间,无其他心血管疾病迹象,并接受12周的治疗。在诊所评估血压,患者在工作日和假期在家自行测量血压,以及在诊所随访前和随访时测量血压。在为期12周的研究结束时,两组患者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)均显著降低,幅度相似。然而,与氯沙坦治疗相比,佐非普利治疗的即刻或早期舒张压降低以及第一个月的舒张压降低明显更大(p= 0.01和p= 0.003)。经过3个月的治疗和剂量增加,两组的临床血压降低相似。然而,与佐非普利(33.1%)相比,更多的氯沙坦患者使用了更高的剂量步长(42.1%)。家庭血压评估显示收缩压和舒张压明显低于临床血压计测得的血压。特别是,工作日和节假日就诊前2-3天的评估值明显较低,而就诊期间的测量值与医生常规的血压测量值基本相似。与研究药物相关的不良事件的数量和严重程度在两组中基本上是良性的,并且相似。目前的研究表明,临床推荐剂量的佐非普利在治疗上至少与氯沙坦治疗相当,无论是在医生办公室用常规血压计评估,还是在家中由患者自行测量血压评估。然而,在治疗的第一个月,唑非普利诱导更快的初始血压降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1